Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT Blogs
Comment Central - Daniel Finkelstein's rolling guide to opinion on the web

Comment Central - Times Online - WBLG

« Sign of the times | All Posts | Should Turkey join the EU? »

November 29, 2006

Russian journalist points finger at Putin over Litvinenko death

Putin_russianjournalist_copy

Yulia Latynina has cojones. She is a Russian journalist who is willing to point the finger at Putin's security apparatus over Litvinenko's death. This is her pay-off in her Moscow Times opinion article

Putin has surrounded himself with friends who were not trained to run businesses or to run the country. They were trained to carry out special operations. They were trained to eliminate enemies of the regime. And when there aren't any real enemies, they have to be created. For some reason, as more enemies of the regime are eliminated, their number continues to grow. And Putin is left alone, surrounded by enemies from whom only his friends can save him.

A brave woman.

Robbie Millen

Posted by Robbie Millen on November 29, 2006 in Alexanda Litvenenko | Permalink | Comments (8) | TrackBack (0) | Email this post

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/297284/6976979

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Russian journalist points finger at Putin over Litvinenko death:

Comments

Her finger is always pointed at Putin whatever happens out there. So don't be surprised, that's her regular posture. The same was true about Litvinenko who accused Putin in explosions in Moscow, in 9/11, 7/7, etc...

Posted by: student | 29 Nov 2006 13:37:05

What makes the previous poster think the FSB didnt carry out the Moscow apartment bombings? Some people have no memory at all. Perhaps I can refresh your memory. This except was taken from Wikipedia. Any thoughts?

On the evening of September 22, 1999, an alert resident of an apartment building in the town of Ryazan noticed strangers moving heavy sugar sacks into the basement from a car. Militia (the local police) were called to the site and all residents were evacuated. The first test of the powder from the sacks showed the presence of an explosive. All roads from the town were brought under heavy surveillance but no leads were found. A telephone service employee tapped into long-distance phone conversations managed to detect a conversation in which an out-of-town person suggested to take care and to watch for patrols. That person's number was found to belong to an FSB office in Moscow.

Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti declared that the incident was a training exercise forty-eight hours later. The original chemical test was declared inaccurate due to contamination of the analysis apparatus from a previous test. The public inquiry committee could not come to a complete conclusion on this and other incidents due to incoherent answers from federal bodies. The General Prosecutor's office has closed the criminal investigation of the Ryazan incident in April 2000.

Posted by: HSM | 29 Nov 2006 14:56:24

Dear readers of TIMESONLINE,

May I have a chance expressing slightly different view from Russia?

Russian press is divided over the issue related to death of Mr. Litvinenko. Please, see BBC site http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6183364.stm
Hence, Mrs. Latynina is not the only brave journalist in Russia expressing concerns over possible involvement of authorities.

On the contrary, British media unanimously express one view. (Please, correct me if I am wrong.) Is it normal in democratic society? Is this view supported by solid facts? Should it be a proper police investigation preceding the verdict?

With all respect to lost human lives, both Mr. Litvinenko and Mrs. Politkovskaya became well-known after they died. They created no troubles for Putin before.

Regrettably, the British media coverage of the 'poisoning case' does really poison … minds. Some are even on crusade to win in another Cold War… In my view, the anti-Russian campaign is hitting the roof.

Yet, I am not in position to blame British press… I am rather concern about ours, Russian failures.

I have had a great opportunity spending some time in Britain. I do have very good friends in your country. So, I wonder why we (Russians, our government) failed to make friends within the British establishments.

Are there no common interests at all? Are there really such serious (political, economical) grounds for having Russia as an Eternal Enemy? Well, definitely there are some - as our reluctance to freely share all natural resources with some international/British companies. Is it enough for such hatred?!

Something has to be done. We are not poles apart as some wish to depict. Russia is not a Stalin's camp. Yes, too many problems to be dealt with still, but it is very different country, better country.

We can be good friends and benefit from our cooperation.

I know this.

Your friend,

A Russian Monster

Posted by: Andrei | 29 Nov 2006 15:26:54

Dear readers of TIMESONLINE,

May I have a chance expressing slightly different view from Russia?

Russian press is divided over the issue related to death of Mr. Litvinenko. Please, see BBC site http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6183364.stm
Hence, Mrs. Latynina is not the only brave journalist in Russia expressing concerns over possible involvement of authorities.

On the contrary, British media unanimously express one view. (Please, correct me if I am wrong.) Is it normal in democratic society? Is this view supported by solid facts? Should it be a proper police investigation preceding the verdict?

With all respect to lost human lives, both Mr. Litvinenko and Mrs. Politkovskaya became well-known after they died. They created no troubles for Putin before.

Regrettably, the British media coverage of the 'poisoning case' does really poison … minds. Some are even on crusade to win in another Cold War… In my view, the anti-Russian campaign is hitting the roof.

Yet, I am not in position to blame British press… I am rather concern about ours, Russian failures.

I have had a great opportunity spending some time in Britain. I do have very good friends in your country. So, I wonder why we (Russians, our government) failed to make friends within the British establishments.

Are there no common interests at all? Are there really such serious (political, economical) grounds for having Russia as an Eternal Enemy? Well, definitely there are some - as our reluctance to freely share all natural resources with some international/British companies. Is it enough for such hatred?!

Something has to be done. We are not poles apart as some wish to depict. Russia is not a Stalin's camp. Yes, too many problems to be dealt with still, but it is very different country, better country.

We can be good friends and benefit from our cooperation.

I know this.

Your friend,

A Russian Monster

Posted by: Andrei | 29 Nov 2006 15:34:35

I know there was a lot of debate on this incident but I did not follow it (I was outside Russia) and I actually don't care. As for the other incidents, you probably know that some terrorists where convicted including the militia who did not check the trucks with the explosives. As far as I know, no one regards these people political prisonners or cares what has happenned to them.

In general, I believe that FSB was behind the bombings about as much as that CIA was behind 9/11. That is, I personally don't care but this could be an interesting debate. (I hope you understand that what you presented is just one side of the story)

Posted by: student | 29 Nov 2006 15:47:42

Privet Andrei

I agree with your opinion and I doubt the involvment of Russian government in this affair. FSB would have found other means if they had a real interest.

Drug Rossii!

Posted by: Gerry | 29 Nov 2006 15:52:27

Thank you, Gerry.

Posted by: Andrei | 29 Nov 2006 16:20:41

Robbie,
Do you think a writer in Britain who accused the British government of culpability in the murder of one of its overseas opponents, would even get the article published in a mainstream newspaper? The very fact that Yulia is able to get her views published in a mainstream Russian paper is surely a credit to the political pluralism which exists there.


Posted by: Neil Clark | 30 Nov 2006 09:47:01

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Your Writers

  • Daniel Finkelstein is Chief Leader Writer of The Times and writes a weekly column. Comment Central is his rolling guide to the best opinion on the web. Click here for more information on the blog. Alice Fishburn, the Online Comment Editor, will also be posting.

    Send us an E-Mail

    News from Times Online

    • UK News
    • Crime News
    • Education News
    • Environment News
    • Health News
    • Political News
    • Science News
    • World News
    • Iraq News
    • US News
    • Europe News
    • Middle East News
    • Asia News
    • Africa News
    • Technology News
    • Business News

Feeds

  • Click for RSS 2.0 feed

three random posts

Recent Comments

  • Sarah on 10 guilty people they always say are innocent
  • Esther on 10 guilty people they always say are innocent
  • Hugh on The best thing since sliced bread
  • john wade on The best thing since sliced bread
  • Tony Coleby on 10 guilty people they always say are innocent

Recent Posts

  • The best thing since sliced bread
  • Monday's comment from the papers in...
  • Today's Web Grab
  • Lost in political conversations?
  • It's a dog's vote

You might also like...

  • conservativehome
  • Oliver Kamm
  • Chris Dillow
  • Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish
  • Arts & Letters Daily
  • Nick Robinson
  • Iain Dale
  • Guido Fawkes
  • Real Clear Politics
  • Clive Davis
  • Stephen Pollard
  • Times Comment
  • Times Online Weblogs
  • Daniel's Weekly Column
  • The Fink Tank
  • Benedict Brogan
  • Boulton and Co.
  • Dizzy Thinks
  • Justin Webb's America
  • Mickey Kaus

Categories

  • 2008 Presidential election
  • Afghanistan
  • Alan Johnson
  • Alastair Campbell
  • Alexanda Litvenenko
  • American Politics
  • Animals
  • Anti-semitism
  • Barack Obama
  • BBC
  • Bill Clinton
  • Blair vs Brown
  • Blair's greatest hits!
  • Blair's legacy
  • Books
  • Boris Johnson
  • Budget 2008
  • Camilla Cavendish
  • Campaign Ads
  • Cash for peerages
  • Celebrities
  • Christopher Hitchens
  • Chuck Colson Award
  • Civil liberties
  • Class
  • Columns in other papers
  • Comment Central Competitions
  • Comment Central interviews...
  • Comment Central lists
  • Conservative Party
  • Crime
  • Current Affairs
  • David Aaronovitch
  • David Cameron
  • Death of Childhood
  • Democratic party
  • Donald Rumsfeld
  • Drugs
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • Film
  • Florence Nightingale Award
  • Food and Drink
  • Football
  • FORA TV programmes
  • Foreign News
  • France
  • Freedom of Information
  • Games
  • Gay rights
  • Gordon Brown
  • Guns
  • Health
  • Hillary Clinton
  • History
  • Home news
  • Homosexuality
  • Hungary
  • Immigration
  • Iran
  • Islam
  • Israel-Palestinian conflict
  • John McCain
  • John Reid
  • Judaism
  • Labour leadership
  • Labour Party
  • Latin America
  • Law
  • Liberal Democrats
  • Madeleine McCann
  • Magazine Rack
  • Maps
  • Mariah Carey
  • Mary Ann Sieghart
  • Mathematics
  • Matthew Parris
  • Media
  • Middle East
  • Miscellaneous
  • Music
  • Name a Times Columnist!
  • New thread
  • NHS
  • North Korea
  • Northern Ireland
  • O.J. Simpson
  • Obesity
  • Obituaries
  • Opinion polls
  • Other newspapers
  • Paris Hilton
  • Parliament
  • Party conferences
  • Pervez Musharraf
  • Petitions
  • Podcasts
  • Political gift guide
  • Political memorabilia
  • President George W Bush
  • Profiles
  • Psychics
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Republican party
  • Rudy Giuliani
  • Science
  • Scotland
  • Sign up to support Sir Ringo!
  • Simon Barnes
  • Social policy
  • Sport
  • Sports
  • Stephen Colbert
  • Strategy Memo
  • Sudan
  • Tax
  • Television
  • Terrorism
  • Thailand's coup
  • The Beatles
  • The Brown manifesto
  • The Catholic Church
  • The Daily Fix
  • The Long Tail
  • The Message Meter
  • The Middle East
  • The War on Terror
  • Tim Hames
  • Times Columnist
  • Times story
  • Today in Times Comment
  • Tony Blair
  • Transport
  • Travel
  • Trident
  • Twofer interviews
  • UKIP
  • United Nations
  • Universities
  • Video
  • War in Iraq
  • Web Grab
  • Web/Tech
  • Weblogs
  • Weekend Central
  • Women

Archives

  • 6 July 2008 - 12 July 2008
  • 29 June 2008 - 5 July 2008
  • 22 June 2008 - 28 June 2008
  • 15 June 2008 - 21 June 2008
  • 8 June 2008 - 14 June 2008
  • 1 June 2008 - 7 June 2008
  • 25 May 2008 - 31 May 2008
  • 18 May 2008 - 24 May 2008
  • 11 May 2008 - 17 May 2008
  • 4 May 2008 - 10 May 2008

Other Times Online Blogs

  • Faith Central

    Urban Dirt

    Alpha Mummy

    BabyBarista

    Ariel Leve

    Big Brother Celebrity Hijack

    Charles Bremner

    Comment Central

    Cricket

    Eco Worrier

    Formula One

    India Knight

    Inside Iraq

    Irwin Stelzer

    Lord Rees-Mogg

    Mary Beard (TLS)

    Money Central

    News

    Sports Commentary

    Peter Stothard (TLS)

    Richard Lloyd Parry

    Ruth Gledhill

    Surf Nation

    Technology

    The Click