Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT Blogs
Comment Central - Daniel Finkelstein's rolling guide to opinion on the web

Comment Central - Times Online - WBLG

« Wolfowitz and the why question | All Posts | Today's Web Grab »

April 13, 2007

Time for a parking charge campaign (I think)

Parking_meterI think it's time for a campaign.

The reason for the note of hesitation is that first I feel I need some legal advice.

A number of papers are carrying a story about the demise of parking meters. They are being replaced by those pay and display ticket machines. And it is these machines that would be the subject of my campaign. If there was to be such a campaign.

Is it really legal for those machines to fail to give you change? Even when the coins you have put in exceed the amount required for the maximum parking time, no change is returned.

I am sure there are some basic laws that make this permissible, but I wonder if some of the myriad laws and regulations governing public bodies and consumer rights really allows this. I suspect it would be possible to have this over charging ruled an abuse and stopped. But this is no more than a suspicion.

I would like to hear from you

a. To find out if you share my view that a symbolic victory against this behaviour would be worth winning. After all, the consumption of my change is a stealth tax, not a fair imposition

and

b. To find out if you or anyone you know might be able to cast some light on the legal questions involved.

UPDATE: if you want to email in confidence, then contact me at commentcentral@thetimes.co.uk

Another UPDATE: Baby Barista gives us some legal advice...

Posted by Daniel Finkelstein on April 13, 2007 in Law , Transport | Permalink | Comments (21) | TrackBack (0) | Email this post

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/297284/17704530

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Time for a parking charge campaign (I think):

Comments

I tell you what's even more outrageous! The bloody ones in Lewisham make you put in the three digits of your license plate too.

So if you pay for three hours and only use two you cannot give your ticket to someone else.

No change, and they fleece the next customer. Scammers.

Posted by: dizzy | 13 Apr 2007 16:13:23

Dizzy,

Haven't the tickets always said "not transferable"? Maybe the first sale doctrine would be another avenue for action though. (Equally on train tickets. Why exactly can't I lend a friend my season ticket to visit town when I am not using it?)

Danny,

BT and other phoneboxes have always done something like this too. You can get back unused coins but no change. If you put in a 50p and only use 20p (a bit unlikely given the cost of payphone calls these days, I admit) you get nothing. However if you put in a 20p before hanging up you can get the 50p back. Geeky but true.

I think this is done because a device where the cashbox can feed coins back into the phone is much more expensive and, most importantly, a great deal easier to break into.

MTK.

Posted by: MTK | 13 Apr 2007 17:08:57

I'd be very interested to learn what the legal position is. The way we are asked to pay for parking seems unfair in many respects. First, we have to guess how long we're going to stay and pay in advance. Inevitably, this often means paying for longer than needed, as the penalty for underestimation can be a large fine. Second, we have to pay using exact change, and we may not always have a suitable selection of coins to hand - again this may often mean overpayment. Third, most machines require us to pay in multiples of one hour. One pound buys an hour, two pounds buys two hours, but two pounds fifty also buys just two hours. Finally, when we discover that the event we parked for has been cancelled, and return to collect our car after just 10 minutes, there is no provision for obtaining any refund for the 3 hours of parking that we had to buy becuase we thought we were most likely going to be there for 2 hours and 10 minutes. All of this is clearly unacceptable, and it baffles me that it is legal. What other goods or services are sold in this way?

Nigel

Posted by: Nigel Harris | 13 Apr 2007 19:57:59

Here in Lowestoft not only do they refuse change, a voice then warns you to 'Lock your car, there are thieves about'!

Posted by: Tony | 14 Apr 2007 00:58:28

Plus ca change - those in a position of power will always set things up to their own advantage.

However, this particular example is theft, pure and simple. It reminds me of that other great scam - employers taking your holiday off you if you fail to use it quickly enough.

Posted by: Hugh Tonks | 14 Apr 2007 10:57:24

The smartest parking meter I ever encountered was on a trip to Germany to see a solar eclipse during 1990s. I was in Burghausen on the Salzach River, just across from Austria. I paid up to the parking meter as many coins as I had to see the event. I actually overpaid the meter past the 6:00 PM metering period. The meter was smart enough to save the payment as a credit the next morning after metering began at 9:00 AM.

Posted by: Gilbert Kiefer | 14 Apr 2007 17:17:55

I seem to remember some parking ticket machines were adorned with the legend, "No change given. Overpayment accepted" - not even 'gratefully' !

Posted by: Martyn Lobley | 15 Apr 2007 00:23:32

Pay and Display is my constant annoyance for all the reasons posted. I often have to end my shopping before I have finished because I underestimated how long it will take and realise my time is up at the meter. But what really annoys me, is that this is at a town owned parking lot. So as a citizen, I own it. And these officials are my employees, hired to make our town work for us. My council tax is paying for it. I am being charged twice. These local government employees seem to have no understanding of what their real function in life is, and that is to make the town work for us. It must be wrong to charge townspeople a tax to park in their own lot. Next they will put up entrance charges for the town park, if they don't sell it off first to a developer.

Posted by: Jane Reynolds | 15 Apr 2007 11:34:45

In Croatia all parking is paid for countrywide by sms for years now. Or why not extend the Oyster scheme in London, or even have a national parking card which can be topped up?
Here in Switzerland there's a city wide parking card.

Posted by: Mick Farrell | 15 Apr 2007 14:57:56

Once I drove into town on Sunday. I'd fed the meter around £10, and then suddenly released it was free. Of course, I couldn't get the money back...

Posted by: Richard Arnold | 15 Apr 2007 16:35:54

Gilbert Kiefer,

I don't think your German meter was necessarily all that clever. Even the meters in Islington can do this, and it's very useful (if still ruinous) if you have friends visiting.

MTK.

Posted by: MTK | 15 Apr 2007 22:39:18

Westminster is switching to a new scam: no meters, payment via mobile phone. So that means that if you leave before your time has expired it can't be used by anyone elese as it could with a meter.

Needless to say, they're also quietly making another killing by using rip-off 0870 numbers.

Presumably if you don't have a mobile your car will have been clamped before you have found a working payphone !

Posted by: Gerry | 15 Apr 2007 23:26:40

And all the time towns are complaining that shoppers are deserting them for the out of town superstores and shopping centres with their unlimited free parking...

Posted by: Chris | 16 Apr 2007 07:18:56

Some machines let you buy time in small increments e.g. 5 minutes. Others force you to buy in large increments - typically 20 minutes. Such machines swallow your extra coins with no warning and give no value for them until you hit the 20 minute threshold. For example if parking is say £1/ hour - machine A may be set to sell time in 20 minute increments. It will happily swallow 6 20p pieces without any warning that no time is being given for the 6th 20p. An identical looking machine - say machine B might be set to give you 1 hour and 12 minutes - for the same £1.20.

It seems to me that the council that operate machine A are guilty of theft - for taking the 6th 20p and giving nothing in return. There seems to be no reason they can't eitehr return the 6th 20p or give you 12 minutes for it since the pay and display machines are quite capable of doing either.

Posted by: jonathan | 16 Apr 2007 09:58:05

I think this is one of those sneaky little lacunae in the law where they're technically not doing anything wrong.

Similar situation to those privately-owned retail car parks that are free for an hour but charge you £60 if you overstay -- they're technically outside of the law as well. If you challenge the ticket, they can't legally enforce it; but the average person doesn't know enough about their rights or contract law and so ends up paying it. Extortion, essentially.

Posted by: accidental lawstudent | 16 Apr 2007 10:32:22

The parking meters in Sheffield charge by the minute. You can work out when to stop adding change when the meter time reaches the time you wish to return. What could be more sensible?

Posted by: Grenville | 16 Apr 2007 11:03:49

The trick of the meters in Manchester is to make the calculating of how much to pay very difficult by breaking hours up into different portions that carry different costs (eg. the first half an hour of each hour costs £x, and then £x for each subsequent 15 mins). Needlessly complicated...

Posted by: Chris | 16 Apr 2007 13:18:22

Rational parking charges are a way of sharing out a scarce resource. Lewisham, Bristol and others, however, go to the expense of installing machines that require you to put in your car number, so you can't pass the space to the next guy when you go early.

Nothing to do with rationing a scarce resource. Everything to do with screwing the punter for every penny you can get. What a miserable contrast with France, where lunchtime parking is free. Still some remnants of civilisation there.

Posted by: Mike Evans | 16 Apr 2007 13:32:47

Parking in Daventry is free. FREE!
Why isn't it everywhere?


Posted by: dave | 16 Apr 2007 15:48:21

Can't you see? Meters are just another source of income for local councils. They go one further in Canterbury, not only do they charge extortion rates to park even late in the evening, but I have seen parking attendants issuing tickets to people at 9pm at night in a carpark that is half empty!

What happened to the days of parking attendants (traffic wardens, to give them their less 'fuzzy' title) who were employed to keep the roads flowing and prevent the abusers of short stay town car parks.

I guess there was no money in that!

Posted by: Mike P | 16 Apr 2007 17:13:29

You're not entitled to change at a shop either. If you use meters a lot and it bothers you that much why not just get organised with a bag of change. This is a non-issue.

Posted by: C.Duke | 16 Apr 2007 23:08:58

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Your Writers

  • Daniel Finkelstein is Comment Editor of The Times and writes a weekly column. Comment Central is his rolling guide to the best opinion on the web. Click here for more information on the blog. Robbie Millen, the Deputy Comment Editor, will also be posting.

    Send us an E-Mail

    News from Times Online

    • UK News
    • Crime News
    • Education News
    • Environment News
    • Health News
    • Political News
    • Science News
    • World News
    • Iraq News
    • US News
    • Europe News
    • Middle East News
    • Asia News
    • Africa News
    • Technology News
    • Business News

Feeds

  • Click for RSS 2.0 feed

three random posts

Recent Comments

  • bert on The Budget that destroyed Brown's alibi
  • H.L.Kimball on Vote for Obama's Vice President
  • Mark Robinson on The Budget that destroyed Brown's alibi
  • Andy Coxon on Vote for Obama's Vice President
  • Jeremy on The Budget that destroyed Brown's alibi

Recent Posts

  • Today's Web Grab
  • A demographic shift for Obama?
  • The scale of the Zimbabwe tragedy
  • How to get up in the morning
  • Magazine Rack - Issue 224

You might also like...

  • conservativehome
  • Oliver Kamm
  • Chris Dillow
  • Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish
  • Arts & Letters Daily
  • Nick Robinson
  • Iain Dale
  • Guido Fawkes
  • Real Clear Politics
  • Clive Davis
  • Stephen Pollard
  • Times Comment
  • Times Online Weblogs
  • Daniel's Weekly Column
  • The Fink Tank
  • Benedict Brogan
  • Boulton and Co.
  • Dizzy Thinks
  • Justin Webb's America
  • Mickey Kaus

Categories

  • 2008 Presidential election
  • Afghanistan
  • Alan Johnson
  • Alastair Campbell
  • Alexanda Litvenenko
  • American Politics
  • Animals
  • Anti-semitism
  • Barack Obama
  • BBC
  • Bill Clinton
  • Blair vs Brown
  • Blair's greatest hits!
  • Blair's legacy
  • Books
  • Boris Johnson
  • Budget 2008
  • Camilla Cavendish
  • Campaign Ads
  • Cash for peerages
  • Celebrities
  • Christopher Hitchens
  • Chuck Colson Award
  • Civil liberties
  • Class
  • Columns in other papers
  • Comment Central Competitions
  • Comment Central interviews...
  • Comment Central lists
  • Conservative Party
  • Crime
  • Current Affairs
  • David Aaronovitch
  • David Cameron
  • Death of Childhood
  • Democratic party
  • Donald Rumsfeld
  • Drugs
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • Film
  • Florence Nightingale Award
  • Food and Drink
  • Football
  • FORA TV programmes
  • Foreign News
  • France
  • Freedom of Information
  • Games
  • Gay rights
  • Gordon Brown
  • Guns
  • Health
  • Hillary Clinton
  • History
  • Home news
  • Homosexuality
  • Hungary
  • Immigration
  • Iran
  • Islam
  • Israel-Palestinian conflict
  • John McCain
  • John Reid
  • Judaism
  • Labour leadership
  • Labour Party
  • Latin America
  • Law
  • Liberal Democrats
  • Madeleine McCann
  • Magazine Rack
  • Maps
  • Mariah Carey
  • Mary Ann Sieghart
  • Mathematics
  • Matthew Parris
  • Media
  • Middle East
  • Miscellaneous
  • Music
  • Name a Times Columnist!
  • New thread
  • NHS
  • North Korea
  • Northern Ireland
  • O.J. Simpson
  • Obesity
  • Obituaries
  • Opinion polls
  • Other newspapers
  • Paris Hilton
  • Parliament
  • Party conferences
  • Pervez Musharraf
  • Petitions
  • Podcasts
  • Political gift guide
  • Political memorabilia
  • President George W Bush
  • Profiles
  • Psychics
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Republican party
  • Rudy Giuliani
  • Science
  • Scotland
  • Sign up to support Sir Ringo!
  • Simon Barnes
  • Social policy
  • Sport
  • Sports
  • Stephen Colbert
  • Strategy Memo
  • Sudan
  • Tax
  • Television
  • Terrorism
  • Thailand's coup
  • The Beatles
  • The Brown manifesto
  • The Catholic Church
  • The Daily Fix
  • The Long Tail
  • The Message Meter
  • The Middle East
  • The War on Terror
  • Tim Hames
  • Times Columnist
  • Times story
  • Today in Times Comment
  • Tony Blair
  • Transport
  • Travel
  • Trident
  • Twofer interviews
  • UKIP
  • United Nations
  • Universities
  • Video
  • War in Iraq
  • Web Grab
  • Web/Tech
  • Weblogs
  • Weekend Central
  • Women

Archives

  • 11 May 2008 - 17 May 2008
  • 4 May 2008 - 10 May 2008
  • 27 April 2008 - 3 May 2008
  • 20 April 2008 - 26 April 2008
  • 13 April 2008 - 19 April 2008
  • 6 April 2008 - 12 April 2008
  • 30 March 2008 - 5 April 2008
  • 23 March 2008 - 29 March 2008
  • 16 March 2008 - 22 March 2008
  • 9 March 2008 - 15 March 2008

Other Times Online Blogs

  • Faith Central

    Urban Dirt

    Alpha Mummy

    BabyBarista

    Ariel Leve

    Big Brother Celebrity Hijack

    Charles Bremner

    Comment Central

    Cricket

    Eco Worrier

    Formula One

    India Knight

    Inside Iraq

    Irwin Stelzer

    Lord Rees-Mogg

    Mary Beard (TLS)

    Money Central

    News

    Sports Commentary

    Peter Stothard (TLS)

    Richard Lloyd Parry

    Ruth Gledhill

    Surf Nation

    Technology

    The Click