Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT BLOGS Comment Central

Comment Central - Times Online - WBLG

« Long live the Queen's English | All Posts | Magazine Rack - Issue 30 »

July 23, 2007

Why I hate facebook

Facebook

I’m part of the eGeneration and we don’t care for traditional grammar. We own iPods, shop on eBay, spend hours on YouTube. So now it must be time to hop onto the web’s latest bandwagon – the social networking site, facebook. Oh please, don’t make me LOL.

For the uninitiated, here’s a bluffer’s guide to facebook. But if 25 million people worldwide are signed up to it, what’s the problem with facebook?

For me, it’s not the recent stories about the privacy problems that surround the site. It’s the pointless and annoying competition the website arouses. As facebook is the latest thing “everyone’s doing”, there’s bound to be hundreds of people you know who are also doing it. They become your facebook friends. But after that, any random encounter is treated by many as a reason to become “friends” online. The distinction between friend, acquaintance, and person you acknowledge with a cursory nod has become dangerously blurred.

Facebook has descended into a tedious popularity contest. “Look, look I have more friends than you do – there’s a tally that proves it”. No, it doesn’t. It might mean you have more friends of a friend, or more likely, friends of a friend of a friend. One guy I met told me that he wanted to be the first guy he knew to have sex with someone they’ve met through facebook – something he called a “facebook f**k”. Lovely.

The site has developed it’s own self-obsessive culture. I can't remember predecessors to facebook, like Friends Reunited and MySpace having the culture of moral superiority that revolves around those who use it – as though today, not engaging in facebook is an ASBO offence. One mate of mine was told by her childhood friend: “you know, you really should sign up to facebook, so we can keep in touch properly”. Properly? What happened to emails, phone calls, texts, and even meeting up once in a while? When did facebook become the glue in modern companionship?

This kind of social networking is as virtual and unreal as the internet itself. At the risk of descending into old codgery, what happened to the good ol’ days when we actually met new people away from our desks, new experiences were sought, and friendships turned out to mean something? Surely having 10 friends that you rely on is better than having 100 who you say hi to online?

That’s not to say that these sites like facebook don’t sometime serve some great purposes. For example, the admirable students of Virginia Tech who used facebook to share information about the victims of the school shootings there so they could instantly commemorate the dead.

But even in these cases, the ties that hold these communities together is through the forging of real relationships. That takes time, effort and dedication – a concept lost on an eGeneration used to getting everything from the click of a button.

Murad Ahmed

Posted by Murad Ahmed on July 23, 2007 at 12:28 PM in Web/Tech | Permalink Bookmark and Share

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451586c69e200e008ddbf5b8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why I hate facebook:

Comments

Why I hate facebook

Facebook

I’m part of the eGeneration and we don’t care for traditional grammar. We own iPods, shop on eBay, spend hours on YouTube. So now it must be time to hop onto the web’s latest bandwagon – the social networking site, facebook. Oh please, don’t make me LOL.

For the uninitiated, here’s a bluffer’s guide to facebook. But if 25 million people worldwide are signed up to it, what’s the problem with facebook?

For me, it’s not the recent stories about the privacy problems that surround the site. It’s the pointless and annoying competition the website arouses. As facebook is the latest thing “everyone’s doing”, there’s bound to be hundreds of people you know who are also doing it. They become your facebook friends. But after that, any random encounter is treated by many as a reason to become “friends” online. The distinction between friend, acquaintance, and person you acknowledge with a cursory nod has become dangerously blurred.

Facebook has descended into a tedious popularity contest. “Look, look I have more friends than you do – there’s a tally that proves it”. No, it doesn’t. It might mean you have more friends of a friend, or more likely, friends of a friend of a friend. One guy I met told me that he wanted to be the first guy he knew to have sex with someone they’ve met through facebook – something he called a “facebook f**k”. Lovely.

The site has developed it’s own self-obsessive culture. I can't remember predecessors to facebook, like Friends Reunited and MySpace having the culture of moral superiority that revolves around those who use it – as though today, not engaging in facebook is an ASBO offence. One mate of mine was told by her childhood friend: “you know, you really should sign up to facebook, so we can keep in touch properly”. Properly? What happened to emails, phone calls, texts, and even meeting up once in a while? When did facebook become the glue in modern companionship?

This kind of social networking is as virtual and unreal as the internet itself. At the risk of descending into old codgery, what happened to the good ol’ days when we actually met new people away from our desks, new experiences were sought, and friendships turned out to mean something? Surely having 10 friends that you rely on is better than having 100 who you say hi to online?

That’s not to say that these sites like facebook don’t sometime serve some great purposes. For example, the admirable students of Virginia Tech who used facebook to share information about the victims of the school shootings there so they could instantly commemorate the dead.

But even in these cases, the ties that hold these communities together is through the forging of real relationships. That takes time, effort and dedication – a concept lost on an eGeneration used to getting everything from the click of a button.

Murad Ahmed

  • Your writers

    Daniel Finkelstein,
    is Chief Leader Writer of The Times and writes a weekly column. Comment Central is his rolling guide to the best opinion on the web.
    Hattie Garlick, the Online Comment Editor, will also be posting.

    Send us an email

    Click here for more information on the blog.

    Latest posts

    Latest comments

    Categories

    Select from the dropdown

You might also like...

  • 2008 Presidential election
  • Justin Webb's America
  • Boulton and Co.
  • Benedict Brogan
  • Dizzy Thinks
  • Chris Dillow
  • The Fink Tank
  • Daniel's Weekly Column
  • Oliver Kamm
  • Stephen Pollard
  • Iain Dale
  • Nick Robinson
  • Guido Fawkes
  • Conservative Home
  • Clive Davis
  • Arts & Letters Daily
  • Liam Murray
  • Marbury
  • Real Clear Politics
  • Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish
  • Mickey Kaus
  • Political Betting
  • Times Online Weblogs
  • Times Comment

News from
Times Online

  • UK
  • Crime
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Political
  • Science
  • World
  • Iraq
  • US
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Asia
  • Africa
  • Technology
  • Business
  • US Elections
Other Times Online blogs
  • Sports Book
  • Boxing
  • Alpha Mummy
  • Line and Length
  • The Game
  • Fanzine Fanzone
  • Formula 1
  • Rugby league
  • Sports Commentary
  • Technology