Where the Sun shines
Like the rest of you, I try never to miss David Blunkett's column in The Sun on Wednesdays. The combination of insight, wit and erudition makes it irresistible.
This week, I feel that towering figure has really outdone himself with his reflections on the terrible treatment of Gillian Gibbons by the brutal Sudanese government. After much thought he comments:
If we ever needed a lesson in the stupidity of political correctness this was it.
Mr Blunkett goes on to compare the arbitrary imprisonment by islamofascist lunatics with the failure by "hand-wringing" town halls to send out religious Christmas cards.
He probably had this idea a week ago and has been scouring the media, worried lest another perspicacious commentator made this comparison before he did. What a relief! He turned out to be the only columnist who had thought of it.
Truly the Home Office's loss is journalism's gain.
Whereas with you, cheerfully enough, journalism gaining you also meant politics gained. Certainly the Party's never looked back since we said goodbye to you.
Posted by: Ex-CRD | 5 Dec 2007 16:19:40
Political correctness? Then why was he so loyal a member of a government that did so much to promote it?
I haven't seen so hypocritical a volte face since Trevor Phillips started thinking.
Posted by: Julian Cox | 5 Dec 2007 16:51:22
Ex-CRD - It is true that Daniel is not really a Tory but is a leftist like David Aaronovitch and me, so I can understand your bitterness. But be aware that a noun that precedes a gerund must be in the genitive case; so it should be "journalism's gaining you", not "journalism gaining you". Just thought you'd like to know.
Posted by: Oliver Kamm | 6 Dec 2007 15:44:56
Despite being unable to find Mr Blunkett's column, I found re-familiarising myself the nether reaches of The Sun to be an eye-opening experience. For someone like me, who spends much of his time abstractly thinking about how to improve the world, it's always been a source of mystery how I continually miss the important intellectual examinations of life captured so unerringly by publications such as The Sun.
Thanks for triggering the experience.
Posted by: Simon Stephenson | 6 Dec 2007 20:17:12
Im not sure about this gerund business. I find it hard to believe that ex-crd was attempting to use a gerund in order to have misused it (if indeed the terminology is strictly transferable into English). Instead he is using a participial phrase as the "subject" of the sentence. Whether this is strictly good grammar I dont know. The use of genitive in the way suggested to provide a clear subject to the sentence certainly seems preferable. It is after all a formula - x's lost is y's gain and as with many things sticking to the traditional way of doing things is best.
Posted by: Francis | 6 Dec 2007 20:38:01