The greatest mistake in British history
UPDATE: David Aaronovitch's contribution
UPDATE: Oliver Kamm's contribution
UPDATE: Some of your contributions
This post started with Bobvis listing what he regards as the ten worst errors in US history. He finished by challenging Chris Dillow to name the ten worst British mistakes.
Despite being neither a politician or a Jew, Chris chose to argue with the question rather than answer it.
So I think we should answer it, don't you?
Comment Central has asked a variety of Times writers to propose a candidate for the greatest mistake in British history. In the comment thread underneath this post you are invited to join in - proposing your own candidates or endorsing someone elses.
And then we'll have a vote.
Here goes with the suggestions.
Graham Stewart:
Circular 10/65: When Tony Crosland, Secretary of State for education in 1965, requested local authorities to scrap grammar schools and institute one-size-fits-all comprehensives across the country. This meant having to pay for selective education.
Matthew Parris:
1) The First World War
2) The Boer War
3) The failure of the Irish Home Rule Bill
Mick Hume:
The Restoration of the Monarchy in 1660. Never mind looking forward to being "subjects" of Charles III, we need never have had a Charles II and all the leftovers of the middle ages he brought with him.
Anjana Ahuja:
I agree to some extent with Jared Diamond that the worst mistake in the history of the human race, let alone Britain, was the replacement of hunter-gathering by agriculture, which fuelled rapid population growth, urbanisation and disease.
William Rees-Mogg:
The five worst mistakes of British kings
1. Harold rushing to the Battle of Hastings. He could have won if he had made William come to him.
2. Henry II sending the knights to murder Thomas a Beckett in Canterbury Cathedral
3. Charles I losing the civil war to Cromwell and being executed
4. George III losing America to Washington and
5. Edward VIII falling in love with Mrs Simpson
Libby Purves:
The Establishment of the Church of England - its entanglement with secular power and influence.
Although there has been much merit in Anglicanism, over too long a historical period the political/royal supremacy of the established church has created:
a) a sense of smug righteousness, and a lack of self-questioning, in the ruling classes
b) a feeling that dissent, moral exploration and indeed private mysticism were somehow 'unreliable' , foreign, subversive and disreputable.
Many of our failings - intellectual laziness, spiritual constipation and social snobbery in particular - can be related to this unholy teaming-up of secular power with the established church.
Roy Hattersley:
Failing to have a revolution in 1848.
Camilla Cavendish:
Mrs Thatcher's signing of the Single European Act in 1986, which set off the steady slide towards federalism
Nigel Hawkes:
1. Executing the 1916 Easter Rising plotters in Ireland ranks among the stupidest.
2. The Red Flag Act (1890s) probably stopped the UK being a leader in car manufacture, as it had been in steam engines.
3. And the 1948 centralised structure of the NHS (the high watermark of Stalinist planning) has damaged health care delivery for 60 years. Astonishingly, many people still think this was a good idea.
Magnus Linklater:
Any historical mistake is judged from today’s political perspective and therefore carries with it the prejudices and opinion of today, which may not have been applicable then.
However, there are three great historical decisions that I think in retrospect were wrong.
1. Henry VIII’s decision to break with Rome over the powers of the King. This plunged Britain into a divisive religious conflict whose effect is still being felt today.
2. George III and the loss of the American colonies. In retrospect, what a tragic decision that was.
3. Undoubtedly you’d have to put up there the partition of India and Pakistan, which had a huge death toll and set up divisions that still have an impact.
Ben Macintyre:
Kabul, 1842. One of the worst mistakes in British history - certainly the worst tactical and military error – was the invasion of Afghanistan in 1839. The British marched in with the newest high technology (cannon), extreme optimism, and almost no understanding of the country we were invading. A ruler we did not approve of was replaced with a puppet we liked much more and all the top brass predicted a walk-over.
Three years later, the Afghan tribes were united in their hatred of the imperialists, the British were besieged and outnumbered, and then attempted to retreat across the Khyber pass in bitter cold with no guarantee of safe passage, under constant attack from the Afghans. An estimated 16,000 people died in the retreat from Kabul of 1842; a lone survivor, Dr William Brydon, reached Jalalabad fort, bringing news of the worst disaster in British imperial history.
And me:
Appeasing Hitler in his early years and allowing him to believe that he could get away with expanding his power.
Now it's your turn


Any Act or action carried out by any government without the full, and fully informed, consent of the British people.
Posted by: david jones | 7 Feb 2008 17:12:34
Caving into the desires of the Americans over the joint French/ British invasion of the Suez Canal.
Posted by: Mike Eastoe | 7 Feb 2008 17:45:51
Sorry for intervening but being from the country which lost almost 27,000,000 people in WWII (which war could easily be avoided by stopping Hitler's military program at an early stage) I would agree with Mr Finkelstein.
Yet another dearest mistake was that GB did not properly help Russia (which, again, suffered most) during WWI or at least did not help the Whites during the Civil War.
Yes, eventually, the Civil War was our problem but if you had helped the world could be quite different...
Posted by: Egor | 7 Feb 2008 18:26:52
Appeasing extremist Islam in (these) its early years and allowing it to believe that it can get away with expanding its power.
Posted by: Tim Fellows | 7 Feb 2008 18:45:14
Constantine III deciding that as he had three legions, he could become Roman Emperor instead of ruling over the Britons. So he took his legions with him into Gaul, lost and that is how the Romans left Britain.
Caving in over Suez. If that hadn't happened, Nassir would have met reality far sooner and the Gaza Strip and the West Bank might still be in Arab Control.
Posted by: Peter Metcalfe | 7 Feb 2008 18:57:35
The persecution of five of the Seven Bishops for their refusal to swear allegiance to William the III. The Church of England lost itself then.
Posted by: Peter Metcalfe | 7 Feb 2008 19:06:05
Being 'bounced' into the EU and ALL its Federal ideas plus the Human rights act
Posted by: rigby | 7 Feb 2008 19:25:12
1. The Yalta conference.
2. The Treaty of Versailles.
3. The recgnition of Israel by the UN without safeguards for resident arabs (UK on security council).
Posted by: Marek | 7 Feb 2008 19:27:30
What I like about the Guardian blogs is that your comments appear instantly and are taken down later if unsuitable.
Posted by: Marek | 7 Feb 2008 19:33:50
1) The loss of Britain's possessions in France
2) Letting Ted Heath within sniffing distance of the reins of power
3) Gordon Brown, ditto
4) Allowing the UK to become a safe haven for all manner of unsavoury Islamic fundamentalists
5) Operation Market Garden (if it had succeeded it would have been a triumph, but its failure extended the Western War by six months and let the Reds stomp all over Eastern Europe)
Posted by: David Gillies | 7 Feb 2008 19:36:35
1. I agree with Danny appeasing Hitler wasn't too clever.
2. Hiring loads of Anglo-Saxon mercenaries in the 5th century.
3. Paying MPs
4. Moving here from nice places like Normandy, Denmark, Norway, Ireland etc
5. Being railroaded into helping the destruction of Palestine.
6. Not translating the Bible into English sooner.
7. Waging a war of cultural genocide against the Irish.
8. Allowing the Unions to bring the country to it's knees.
9. Allowing Cromwell to start a military junta after having previously been such a good egg.
10. The mistakes we haven't made yet.
Posted by: A British Mistake | 7 Feb 2008 19:44:31
Falling for Climate Change.
hahahahahahaaaaaaaa
Posted by: Daveyboy | 7 Feb 2008 19:45:08
1) Entering the First World War;
2) Imposing the terms of the Verseilles Treaty on defeated Germany after that War;
3) Entering the EEC/EU after the Second World War.
Posted by: Victor | 7 Feb 2008 19:57:02
After World War I ended the British Empire was fairly united and loyal to the Crown but also had many colonies, and Ireland, with growing nationalist movements. If at this time the British Government had created a mechanism for each colony to peacefully move towards homerule then I believe we would have become a huge federation of equal states united by the Crown in friendship. Image that, a British Federation of equals covering 1/4 of the globe. It would have changed the history of the planet.
Posted by: Luke Magee | 7 Feb 2008 20:34:45
Several commentators have ckamed that the loss of the American Colonies was one of the worst mistakes in British history.
Was It? Consider an alternative history in which the colonists were molified, the War of Independance never took place, The United Dominions of America remained under the management of the Whitehall bureaucracy. I do not seriously belive that the USA would have grown into the Economic and industrial powerhouse that it did. The Culture of the Oxbridge alumni in Whitehall,s mandarinate would have, I belive , have stiffled the UDA.
Regards
WD Toulman
Walkington
East Yorkshire
Posted by: W D Toulman | 7 Feb 2008 21:13:55
Spam fritters (served on Wednesdays at my now long defunct Grammar School)
Stonehenge (began the British propensity for noble efforts that ultimately accomplish little and aren't as impressive as other nation's extravagant follies,i.e. the Pyramids etc.)
Posted by: Simon W. | 7 Feb 2008 21:22:48
The Entente Cordiale, which needlessly dragged us into the First World War and probably led to it becoming such a long drawn out, muderous conflict. That then led indirectly to the Russian Revolution and Hitler. The final result was a bankrupt and exhausted Britain, the Cold War and now the EU!
Posted by: Tim | 7 Feb 2008 21:26:26
Failure to make Ireland & America part of the union, rather than just colonies. Military ones are innumerable, possibly due to the same mindset.
Posted by: Tony Cunningham | 7 Feb 2008 21:49:17
The biggest mistake is failing to teach history. Most of your invited comments are a good reflection on that, since they reflect the personal - and rather daft -prejudices of the proposers rather than anything rational.
All of them are pretty silly, but take just three. The Restoration: does Mr Hattersley seriously think that, for example, the French Terror was a better alternative? 1776? Does anyone seriously imagine that the US would not have become independent sooner or later anyway? No revolution in 1848? Have you asked a Hungarian, German, or Austrian how they feel about the benefits of that one. Noble bloodshed better than muddling through?
You know, if you ask dumb people a dumb question, you will get a lot of dumb answers. Especially if the dumb people you ask only imagine themselves to be British.
Posted by: jon livesey | 7 Feb 2008 22:04:13
The Labour Government spending the post war loans from the U.S. on nationalising coal, steel and railways. It stifled post war Britain for decades.
Posted by: Malcolm Parker | 7 Feb 2008 22:20:24
The aristocratic family squabbles that led to ww one and the consequent murder of millions of the brightest and the best young men of the so called civilized world
Posted by: robert williamson | 7 Feb 2008 22:39:52
World War Two; Britain wrecked it's Economy, lost it's Empire, and thousands of people for what ? To hand over Eastern Europe to a murderous Russian totalitarian dictator rather than a murderous German Totalitarian Dictator. Smart move guys.
Posted by: Brummydoug | 7 Feb 2008 23:02:43
Suez
Posted by: JL Ronish | 7 Feb 2008 23:04:05
1. Harold relying on manpower to win Hastings, not prepared defences or prepared ground.
2. Providing public service posts to members of the nobility (and now political favourites) once the general public was educated: corruption, of any sort, leads to decay.
3. That vile snake Gladstone: with his high vauling tomes about the good of other peoples - deliberately leaving Gordon to die in Khartoum - providing the impression that empire was a lost cause (manipulation of public opinion and discarding the facts - those who admire him, Bush and Howard (Blair?) follow his example. It took a later generation to fix the mess - particularly the ideological extreemism, dressed up as nationalism, in the Sudan. Threads of this era (mid-late 1800's) are part of the chord of what is happening in the Sudan today.
4. Bodyline bowling - deliberately injuring Australian cricketers. Appologise or I'll smack a pom.
5. The type of reform of the House of Lords - deliberately destroying its potential for political impartiallity. Better to require eight years military service, or a degree in constitutional law or history - thus they prove their competence.
6. Ignoring the provisions of the Bill of Rights (1689) - and not extending them to have disqualified men like Tony Blair.
7. Not agreeing to the Tsar's proposal to dismantle the Ottoman Empire - thus: condemming Balkan christians to years of brutal oppression; entering the Crimean War; having to dismantle the Ottoman Empire anyway in the First World War.
8. Signing the Entente Cordiale with France - whilst Germany was making martial noises: thus the involvement in the First World War (what was that about, by the way?), for none of the powers involved really stood to gain.
9. All signings of European Acts and treaties.
10. Churchill's agreeing to American demands for access to Commonwealth markets, the Commonwealth's combined gold reserves, and all of our technology (at least, what they want) in return for a so-called 'alliance' during the second world war and afterwards.
11. Abandoning the original idea of empire: that the world will be ruled by brown Englishmen, in return for the idea that Britons have right to rule all countries (most of you don't think that now, but the ramifications still linger).
Posted by: David M | 7 Feb 2008 23:42:59
King Harold rushing to the Hastings to fight William's invasion force in 1066.
William's troops probably could not have faced a more drawn out war, although he was a very determined man.
The Norman conquest probably led to a more imperialistic history than would otherwise have been the case, causing internal UK and other antipathies.
Posted by: Nick Bott | 8 Feb 2008 00:18:16
Following a disasterous colonial history of invading and murdering indigenous populations with "agreements" with the remaining population occasionally following, in the case of assuming ownership of Australia declared it to be "terra nullius" then proceeded to wipe out the aborigonal population leaving those remaining unrecognised in law and never apologising for it!
Posted by: Brian Jean | 8 Feb 2008 00:31:25
Either not taking part at all, making early reasonable peace terms with Germany or (as someone suggested) even being defeated in WW1. Much immediate suffering would have been avoided, Nazism would not have arisen nor the Russian Revolution and the Cold War. Robert Graves accused Lloyd George of unnecessarily prolonging the war for two more years. France exacted economic revenge for 1870. With hindsight such fateful misjudgements. Would though the bristling rival Imperial powers have been able to avoid war later in the century?
Posted by: Bob T | 8 Feb 2008 00:32:42
The greatest mistake is happening now and will come to fruition in the time of my children (who are still at school).
This mistake has been multiculturalism is sofar as it has allowed people from islamic backgrounds into the country and given their views an equal voice.
These people as we know will not integrate and are highly antagonistic to our concepts of freedom, liberty and tolerance.
We are standing as observers watching this whole sad affair unfold and are (still) doing nothing.
Posted by: Robert Lore | 8 Feb 2008 00:48:29
May I have leave to change the subject slightly? Bismarck's biggest mistake was not to dismantle France in 1871, as he could have done easily, into traditional regions, Provence happily seceding, as would have Toulouse raped by Paris, Burgundy, Aquitaine, etc. This would have left revanchists like Raymond Poincaré impotent, whose poisonous hatred of Germany (exercised from 1902 until his death 1934) may be blamed for both WWI and WWII (more than your favorite bete noir, our Kaiser). I can agree with Matthew Parris: A greated mistake was England's entry into WWI.
Posted by: Hermann Burchard | 8 Feb 2008 01:03:57
accepting that former members of the empire or commonwealth have right of abode in the united kingdom.
becoming part of the euro-state.
electing nu-labour for the past 10 years.
allowing mp's to regulate their expenses and allowances.
Posted by: james morrell | 8 Feb 2008 01:24:28
i do believe they were promised safe passage.
Posted by: james morrell | 8 Feb 2008 01:26:55
Britain declaring war on National Socialist Germany in September 1939. What did we gain from it? An end to the Empire, decades of poverty, baby boomers, 'the sixties' and so on. We should have declared neutrality like Ireland, or support.
Posted by: Chris | 8 Feb 2008 01:48:36
Munich: Hitler was militarily weaker than we thought, the Czech's were well armed and up for a fight, they were democratic (unlike Poland) and elements of the German high command were considering a coup if we had stood up to Hitler. Instead we sold the Czech's out with the well known consequences, not least that a large proportion of the Blitzkrieg in 1940 was made up of Czech manufactured tanks...
Posted by: Neil | 8 Feb 2008 01:56:25
Didnt like that bit about Charles 1 and anyway it was a fair fight and he started it.
Posted by: Cromwell | 8 Feb 2008 02:13:24
I would say the Entente Cordial strikes me as having been a mistake. If we had allied with Germany instead (as we had previously) there would have been no WW1, on the basis of the Churchillian mantra that you will only get a war if both sides think they have a chance of winning
Giving in to Clemenceau over Germany having to pay crippling levels of reparations
Chamberlain going to meet Hitler in 1938 (although to be fair, he wasn't to know the German army were plotting to overthrow Hitler)
The 1965 defence spending review, which removed any chance we had of an armed forces able to act independently of the USA
On a light-hearted note, not putting De Gaulle up against a wall and shooting him when we had the chance...
Posted by: Mark Heenan | 8 Feb 2008 02:15:23
One of the very worst was the Boer war which caused many, many people around the world to begin to seriously detest Imperial Britain. It did, however, give rise to an important British invention... the concentration camp.
As I recall (I'm older than I look)the Brits, faced with their inability to defeat the Dutch settlers defending their homes and farms, put their families in concentration camps.
Nasty!
Posted by: brad coons | 8 Feb 2008 03:05:51
Not "Copenhagening" (ie pre-emptively attacking and destroying) the Imperial German fleet in its early stages of development and as advocated by Admiral Fisher in 1904.
Posted by: Mike Wilkes | 8 Feb 2008 03:38:49
Biggest mistake in British history?
Mass immigration that has effectively destroyed this nation's identity, replacing it with unworkable multiculturalism. A profound and very sad state of affairs.
Posted by: Lawrence Ash | 8 Feb 2008 04:56:25
1. Education Act of 1870. Previously education was funded by fees, charity, and top-ups from the government. Now look at the mess.
2. National Insurance Act of 1910. Previously Britons had a safety net called Friendly Societies and 75 percent belonged. And it kept the fees of doctors down.
3. Returning to the Gold Standard in 1925 at pre-war parity. The deflation caused enormous suffering to British working people.
Posted by: Christopher Chantrill | 8 Feb 2008 05:31:08
Releasing holders of land from the Crown of obligations proportionate to the value of their holdings. Hence a need to raise funds for national purposes by other means leading to the incredibly complicated systems of taxation with which we are now burdened. a further consequence was a need to raise public revenue, not merely for essential requirements of a nation - defence, administration of justice, public highways etc but also for relieving the poverty of those lacking rights to land and so obliged to pay those with free holdings for the use of land for dwelling and productive purposes.
Posted by: john pincham | 8 Feb 2008 05:35:32
Declaring the war to Germany in order to grant and enforce Polish independence, and giving her up to Stalin at the end of the war.
Posted by: Norberto | 8 Feb 2008 05:37:55
Betraying the Arabs at the end of WW II by recognizing the state of Israel in Palestine territory despite the loyal Arab contribution to the British war effort during the I and II WWs.
Posted by: Norberto | 8 Feb 2008 05:42:14
Releasing holders of land from the Crown from obligations to the Crown proportionate to the value of their holdings and making them "freeholders". This created a need to raise revenue for public purposes by other means and the incredibly complex systems of taxation with which we are now burdened. With those lacking rights to land being obliged to pay freeholders for its use for living and productive purposes, a massive poor landless underclass arose in need of subsidy to enjoy an acceptable standard of living. This further increased the revenue needed by government and the extent of taxation.
Posted by: john pincham | 8 Feb 2008 05:48:04
Allowing King Edward V to be purchased by the Rothschild family - without anyone even realising it had happened.
Posted by: Howard Grattan | 8 Feb 2008 06:31:26
The inexorable rise of "professional polticans", What is even more disturbing that absurdity has lead to the other tragic error. The inevitable rise of "pressure groups" and "special advisers"
Posted by: Peter Bolt | 8 Feb 2008 07:02:39
pulling out of Africa prematurely following Macmillan's winds of change speech condemned two generations of Africans to poverty,abuse and lack of education at the hands of their own despotic dictators
Posted by: andy james | 8 Feb 2008 07:15:06
Fascinating - in that it shows who are the historians, and who are the politicians-cum-axegrinders. My hat off to Mr Linklater for possibly the best entry.
But it is also rather disappointing to see that some 'mistakes' listed here are the results of complex processes, where it is impossible to say that a person or a body have made a mistake.
Perhaps the most obvious form of this is that we had any choice over our evolution from hunter-gatherers. Then include a myth that they were much healthier and happier. Oh dear.
Posted by: Simon | 8 Feb 2008 07:18:26
The greatest mistake in British history has been the gradual abandonment of the things that made this country one of the foremost contributors to the ascent of man... democracy, the rule of law and the values of the enlightenment.
Posted by: David Stanton | 8 Feb 2008 07:39:41
The two most recent Greatest Mistakes were: Voting In Tony Blair and New Labour, and Ken Livingstone as Mayor of London - now we are beginning to see his true colours, "RED".
Posted by: nick G | 8 Feb 2008 07:47:30
letting Tony Blair and his wife have three shots at ruining Britain for their personal own ends
Posted by: john chambers | 8 Feb 2008 08:07:50
The unchecked tidal wave of immigration will be Englands undoing , as for Britain as a whole , partition in India and Ireland appear to have caused the most harm to our citizen's both home and abroad ,also to our standing in the world .
Partition does not work it only propogates more hatred ,just ask the people of the middle east .
Posted by: Nick Dixon | 8 Feb 2008 08:12:49
The carving up of former British colonies into fictional countries, bounded by previously non-existant borders, uniting unrelated (and frequently mutually hostile) people and lead by hand-picked puppet rulers chosen on the basis of allegiance (read: corruptability) rather than capabilities. A mistake compounded by the French who did much the same (albeit on a smaller scale) that has brought to many of the problems in africa, the middle east and asia that we now face today.
Posted by: Hayden G | 8 Feb 2008 08:27:04
Eliminating Greek & Latin from schools as mandatory subjects. Great countries function under wise elites.
Posted by: Eugene | 8 Feb 2008 08:44:56
Edward VIII was wise enough to know how infinitely preferable it was to be emasculated by a woman he found attractive than by remaining the mere figurehead of a once-great empire.
Posted by: Julia E. S. Spencer | 8 Feb 2008 08:48:58
What an interesting question...as an American, I can refer to the mistakes of the First World War on all sides, but currently there are two big mistakes:
The labor government, and of course the conservatives, rolling over and letting Blair go to war under false pretenses and with historical amnesia: Hey, the British tried Iraq in the 20s with similar "success" and when does a Christian nation do will in the Islamic world since the first crusade? So, first big mistake, the English not having a grasp of their own history.
Second mistake is not to work more closely with the Europeans and create a strong European counterforce against the U.S. and rising China. Only in England, has anyone heard of a 'special relationship' and certainly not in the diverse U.S. Instead of being the puppydog of a U.S. president the British could excert strong and moral leadership in the European Union. And in the end that will happen, because where else really is there to go?
Nice to have current mistakes one can do something about, isn't it?
Posted by: stephen petty | 8 Feb 2008 08:56:19
Taking religious beliefs seriously.
Posted by: R A Morton | 8 Feb 2008 08:59:54
The beginning of large numbers of immigrants in the 1950's later to become a torrent and forever change the makeup of the British population. This remarkable event occurring in an already overcrowded island was never given the OK by the people of the time. Nor since has any opinion been asked of the ordinary person. A grand name was given to this happening still taking place over half a century later, multiculturalism.
Posted by: Fred | 8 Feb 2008 09:09:27
British policy towards Ireland that led to the 1916 uprising and the aftermath.
The execution of WW1 and the failure to find a peaceful solution.
Churchill failing to persuade the Americans that preventing Eastern Europe from falling into Soviet hands was as critical an objective in WW2 as defeating the Axis.
The bodged handling of Indian Independence.
The Suez crisis.
The socialisation of the education system that started in the 1960's.
The sell-out of British sovereignty to Europe throughout the past 40 years.
The ongoing disaster of a failed multicultural and immigration policy.
Re-electing Labour in 2005.
The continued anachronism of a Monarchy in a so-called Democracy.
Posted by: James | 8 Feb 2008 09:18:18
Sending the convicts to Australia. Big mistake. The convicts should've been left in rainy England and there should have been a mass migration - royal family and all - to Australia.
Posted by: Deborah | 8 Feb 2008 09:30:40
Thatcher.
Posted by: bobnessuk | 8 Feb 2008 09:41:35
The Munich Agreement should rank high. The French PM Édouard Daladier and the French general staff wanted to face down Hitler, even if it meant war. Neville Chamberlain was so wound up in his 'personal diplomacy' of giving concessions to Hitler that he refused to coordinate policy with the French or even consider a hard line. Bereft of its heavily fortified borderland, Czechoslovakia was unable to put up a fight and provide a second front in Europe. Also, the heavily industrialised Czech lands strengthened the Germans; nearly 1/3 of German tanks during the blitz in May 1940 was made in Czechoslovakia...
Posted by: Peter H. | 8 Feb 2008 09:48:39
This line of thought is in some ways intellectully pointless. For example if the mistakes of the 1930s had not led to WW2 then we would not have had nuclear power or jet engines by the late 1940s. OK we might have developed these things later, say by 1990 or 2000 but what if in the year 2300 it becomes necessary to use human technology to divert a race killing asteroid from hitting the planet earth? Without our mistakes, wars and tragedies the technology of energy, rocketry and weaponary would not be adequate for the task.
So all the great mistakes would then become great achievements.
For what its worth my top 10 UK mistakes are;
1) Axing the BBC soap Eldorado.
2) Spurs boast in 1990 that they were going to win the FA Cup (in a top ten Chas and Dave song) and then getting knocked out in the semi finals by Arsenal.
3) My second marriage.
4) The actress Lynne Perrie of Coronation Street having plastic surgery whilst on holiday without telling anyone. She was suprised when she was told that people would notice she had a new head having been on holiday to Skegness.
5) Pretty much everything Paul McCartney has done since 1970. (Sorry Paul).
6) Anyone who has ever hired Michael Mansfield QC to represent them. Has that guy ever won a case? All of his clients seem to be doing twenty plus years for things they never did.
7) Mark Chapman missing Yoko Ono six times while he accidentally shot John Lennon.
10) Me missing out mistakes eight and nine.
Posted by: Jon Hart | 8 Feb 2008 10:10:47
Hello, well just say tha I'm spanish and love history. I found very interesting the post. I don't know much about British history, but I can offer some perspective on the little I know from the adversary (historically) point of view.
In my opinion the decision of Henry VII to break with the Catholic Rome was far from a mistake, a great succes. Spain can be taken as a reference of a contry which took the oposite direction and made itself the defender of the catholic church which lead to endless wars all over europe, and let the church, a conservative and fundamentalist institution (we would say nowdays) to get entangled in internal politics, leading to historical embarasment as the Inquisicion.
Posted by: Daniel | 8 Feb 2008 10:15:29
- Snubbing the meetings before the Treaty of Rome, which removed any real chance of britain having real influence in the development of what is now a "not quite" Union.
- Allowing xenophobic outsiders to get their hands on the British Press.
-Constantly looking backwards at a "Golden Age" and failing to look forward, to make the present and immediate future as good as they could be (or at least trying).
- Believing that we have to toe the US line in everything, and if we can't afford (or haven't bothered to develop) needed military equipment, we can get it "cheap" from across the Atlantic.
Posted by: John Price | 8 Feb 2008 10:22:47
The 'Beeching ' of the railways
Posted by: Mother | 8 Feb 2008 10:28:26
Posted by: jon livesey | 7 Feb 2008 22:04:13
(Jon livesey's comment was the most perceptive so far.) Britain's greatest mistake wasn't made in the past. It is being made now by allowing indigenous British people to be overwhelmed by unfettered immigration.
Posted by: Tam Earl-Aine | 8 Feb 2008 11:01:42
Declaring war on Germany in 1939. We were in no condition to fight a war against Nazi Germany and events have shown that Hitler and Stalin would have fought themselves to mutual exhaustion as their war progressed. Ironically, we allied ourselves with two nations that had vested interests in weakening Britain and her Empire to the point of ruin - Soviet Russia and the USA. Hitler actually believed the survival of the British Empire was essential to world stability. Our subsequent inevitable decline, starting with voting in a socialist government in 45, dated from that decision. We have now reached that stage where the Britain that we grew up in and was the supreme achievement of generations of an homogenous, identifiable ‘race’ of people, will have disappeared in about 50years or so and the glory that Britain was, will become, like the Ancient Greeks - a memory that will be marvelled at by future historians.
Posted by: Sean Dunne | 8 Feb 2008 11:09:49
Entering WW1 instead of, with Germany, taking over the parts of the world that were not already in the Empire.
Given that the Crusades were lost in the middle ages, not continuing them in the heyday of Empire.
Forcing the abdication of Edward VIII rather than assassinating Stanley Baldwin and the Archbishops who objected to Mrs Simpson
Not joining the Euro.
Not contiuning all the way to Moscow from Berlin in 1945 with nuclear weapons to help it along a bit.
Allowing the British labour party to exist at all let alone take power
Posted by: Tim | 8 Feb 2008 11:12:27
I can't believe some are saying entering WWII was our greatest mistake. It is the thing I am most proud about Britain for. When other nations protected their own interests we risked all to stop a facisim. Yes it brought about the end of the empire and the USA used it to cream money out of us for the next decades, like the selfish nation it was shown up to be, but we did what was right.
Posted by: David Grimm | 8 Feb 2008 11:21:53
To everyone who thinks appeasement was a mistake - in 1936, we could not have won in a war against Germany, as they had three years of amrs preparation on us. In 1939, we had developed the Spitfire, the weapon which basically saved us when Germany tried to invade. Neville Chamberlain had good reason for what he did, and without appeasement, Hitler could have won WW2 and then where would we all be?!
Posted by: Juliette | 8 Feb 2008 11:36:56
The greatest mistake in British history?
Not to be French !
(un peu d'humour, ça ne fait pas de mal...)
Posted by: Dieu et Mon Droit | 8 Feb 2008 11:39:54
1st July 1916. 57,000 casualties within a few hours when the army advanced on intact defensive positions.
Posted by: Charles | 8 Feb 2008 11:52:17
Well said David Grimm, I couldn't belive some of the comments saying that we should have sided with the Nazis. No matter what the consequences of WWII were, we did the right thing, and are a better people for it.
Posted by: Stewart | 8 Feb 2008 12:23:17
Breaking with Rome, which unleashed a rapacious class of ennobled looters on the wealth of the monasteries whilst ensuring their subservience to the looter in chief: the Crown.
Gone was charity, education, protection of craft guilds. In came Poor Laws, school and college closures and a 'stuff-you' materialism.
Posted by: Recusant | 8 Feb 2008 12:26:27
What a miserable lot we British are! I think that these various lists between them have covered just about every significant act Britain has taken! How about a list of the best things we have done instead??? Then again, it would probably look much the same.
On another note - neutrality in WWII... are you insane? I agree with David Grimm (and Churchill) that WWII, all told, was our finest hour!
Posted by: Tom Simon | 8 Feb 2008 12:50:29
Aberdeen FC not signing Denis Law in the 1950s and selling Charlie Cooke to Dundee for £40,000 in the 60s
Posted by: Alec Rennie | 8 Feb 2008 12:56:57
I agree with Magnus Linklater that any historical mistake is judged from today's political perspective.
Starting from this point of view the great historical wrong decisions of British history are:
1) Henry VIII's break with Rome
2) the Ninenteen Propositions send by Parliament to Charles I at York in 1642 asking him to align himself with protestant nations and to break with Continental Europe.
3)George III and the loss of American colonies
4) the WW1
5) the WW2
Because of these mistakes now Great Britain isn't nor flesh nor fish.
Posted by: Nicola Medici | 8 Feb 2008 13:15:54
Suez:
Not resigning from NATO (or at least threatening it)in order to prevent being considered a US satellite state for the next 50 years.
EU:
Not obtaining free trade status instead of membership.
WW II:
Not annexing all the middle east oil states after victory.
Posted by: Kenneth Paterson | 8 Feb 2008 13:24:21
1) Prince Charles' decision not tomarch on from Derby in 1745 when he could have taken London, restored our legitimate kings, and spared us 270 years of German-speaking Hanoverian halfwits.
2) The failure to use adequate force to suppress the rebel American colonists in 1776 (Lord North famously remarked 'half a dozen frigates will do the job.') Had a more robust line been taken America would now be a peaceful and prosperous part of the British Empire and vastly better off than it now is.
3)Colonising Australia. This has resulted in a constant stream of humiliating cricketing disasters that has sapped national morale to the point where we are prepared to become part of Europe.
4) inCLUDING THE CAPS LOCK KEY ON THE STANDARD KEYBOARD.
Posted by: Peter Croft | 8 Feb 2008 13:42:59
1. Loss of empire (including loss of the American colonies and appeasement of Hitler).
2. Dismemberment of the public school system and thus deterioration of high quality education, with emphasis on the classics
3. Multiculturalism and attempts to appease fundamentalists of other faiths
4. Destruction of competent public transport
5. All movements away from government by an educated elite to government by the population at large
6. Adoption of the EU Human Rights Act
Posted by: Jeanne | 8 Feb 2008 14:27:25
The civil war that is yet to come, partly due to the lies we were told about joining the E.U and partly due to bad goverment past and present alloeing unfettered immigration, I believe it is not far off now
Posted by: sydney hobson | 8 Feb 2008 14:56:09
Tempted to add that 'leaving comment threads open' given the parade of lunacy and fascism above...
More seriously, I think any catalogue would have to include
1. Going to war in 1914;
2. Not going to war in 1938.
While not on the same scale, 3. introducing internment in Northern Ireland in 1971 was a stupid decision, and it was more volitional than the others - it was a real decision, and less the undesirable product of circumstances. I would also add 4. ignoring the Messina conference and 5. Suez.
Posted by: Lewis Baston | 8 Feb 2008 15:05:45
The three greatest mistakes and lost opportunities:
1. Not being a founder signatory of the Treaty of Rome in 1957
2. Not joining the the Schengen area in 1990
3. Not joining the euro in 2000
Never joining in, always opting out, always missing out.
Posted by: Peter GODDARD | 8 Feb 2008 15:41:14
1. Taking off Bobby Charlton in the 1970 World Cup quarter-final against West Germany, allowing Beckenbauer to run riot.
2. Not making Screaming Lord Such Prime Minister.
3. Matthew Parris' "Decapitate cyclists" Christmas message.
4. Inventing television.
5. Trad Jazz.
Posted by: Pete, Hull | 8 Feb 2008 16:17:40
The Left/Liberal consensus that has prevailed in this country since the Second World War. This has resulted in high taxation, a failed state secondary education system, uncontrolled immigration into an already crowded country and the handover of sovereignty to the EU.
Posted by: Mike Smith | 8 Feb 2008 16:31:13
Has everyone forgotton the last few years? Was it not an incredible blunder to blindly follow the Americans into Iraq? I am sure that in 100 years this will be looked upon as one of the biggest mistakes of the 21st century.
Posted by: Alex | 8 Feb 2008 16:31:54
Harold Wilson is outstanding in causing a total disaster in Great Britain. With an extension lasting to Blair and Brown.
Posted by: S af Ugglas | 8 Feb 2008 16:52:24
Great, at least someone in England start to revise critically the british foreign policy before the second world war. What about the Stresa Front? And the anglo-german naval agreement of june 1935? Who crashed the anti-Hitler dam in that period? Who pushed Mussolini in Hitler's hands? Each catastrophe is the result of a chain of mistakes and England made a lot to open the way to war. Was only a genuine wrong strategy or a more cinycal miscalculation?
Posted by: Peter Pan | 8 Feb 2008 17:13:43
God Bless the English. You still believe you had a chance against the "rebel" American colonists. Which stings worse? Losing to a group of raggedy barbarians, or losing to barbarians supported by the French?
Since Yanks and Brits have a recent habit of making mistakes together, I submit Operation Market Garden combined with a failure to get out of the Normany hedgerows sooner. So many of our problems can be traced to letting Stalin win the race to Berlin.
Posted by: Happy American | 8 Feb 2008 17:27:18
Giving away the British:
lead in computer technology;
supersonic experimental aircraft that became the US rocket powered Bell X-1;
invented Magnotron and lead in radar and microwave technology;
lead in jet engine design;
lead in antibiotic technology.
Present unfettered, uncontrolled immigration;
Acceptance of religious fundimentalism and its zealots into the UK;
NuLabours 3rd term.
Enough to be going on with.
Posted by: AGC | 8 Feb 2008 18:02:23
Biggest Mistakes - in no particular order, they were all blunders!
1. The sperm that won the race to the egg to make Margaret Thatcher.
2. Giving the monarchy its power back after the execution of Chuck the first.
3. Henry VIII (reasons are expansive)
4. Letting America go. If we hadn't we'd end up owning half of South America, still have the east and have enjoyed cordial trade relations with Germany since the 1800s.
5. The Slave Trade - reasons? Well just use your common sense!
Stop poncing around with treaties!
Posted by: Barney | 8 Feb 2008 18:21:36
The evolution of the Stiff Upper Lip mentality- which has led to the general public being exploited and lied to by successive governments, local government and corporations. Myriad taxes and stealth tax increases, licensed mugging (wheel clampers and C-charge fines) set against declining services (ie the NHS), exorbitant waste, increased costs for things like public transport, and companies that spend millions on marketing and nothing on people to answer the phone. The British people are treated with a level of effrontery and dishonesty that would shock people from some African dictatorships.
Posted by: Burt | 8 Feb 2008 19:25:49
Surely WW1 was the greatest mistake. Lives lost. And how it led to Treaty of Versailles and German grievance later on.
Posted by: Eamon | 8 Feb 2008 21:18:46
To Mr Hermann Burchard :
Yes you have changed the subject slightly! but so interestingly! I think you must have been writing your article with your heart rather than with your brain,like somebody who probably flares up rapidly... Think of what you have written! So, according to you, Bismarck should have dismantled France in 1871, poor France! What is more, this would have been in total contradiction whith a constant in British foreign policy throughout history regarding continental Europe. No country too powerful on the continent that could rival Britain. A constant that gave the way to Britain to explore the rest of the world. Had France been dismantled and disapeared as a medium-sized power capable of counter-weighting Germany, yes WWI and WWII would have not occured, and nazism and communism would be unknown but I guess another war would have taken place between Britain and Germany to rule the world, without France to play its role as a 'shock absorber'. I would be so sad that Britain be a mere German dominion.
Posted by: sergio | 8 Feb 2008 21:24:53
Balls. Of course we could have defeated the rebel colonists in 1776 with an ounce of grit and muscle and looking ar Clinton Obara and McCain who could possibly argue that they would not be better off as a parish council within the British Empire? They might even have learned how to play cricket and soccer.
Posted by: Peter Croft | 8 Feb 2008 21:32:41
Voting for Attlee and embracing Marxism.
Posted by: Marco | 8 Feb 2008 23:48:51
Well Where to begin, How about the disregard for Human life in search of profit. Famines created in India that killed millions.
Your discussion seems too moderated please post this so that we can have a real dialog about British Attrocities.
Posted by: Malcolm Govender | 9 Feb 2008 01:23:12
Well Where to begin, How about the disregard for Human life in search of profit. Famines created in India that killed millions.
Your discussion seems too moderated please post this so that we can have a real dialog about British Attrocities.
Posted by: Malcolm Govender | 9 Feb 2008 01:24:36
10 fatal errors of political leadership of the 20th century
These are all mistakes in that I think they all backfired politically from the viewpoint of the interests and goals of the principal actors, (from a neutral perspective; whatever the merits of those goals).
1. Chamberlain at Munich.
2. Eden and Suez – how to lie about war to Parliament.
3. The fall of the aristocracy: the Lords rejection of the People’s Budget of 1909.
4. The Foreign Office’s belief that the Treaty of Rome would not amount of anything – turning down the leadership of Europe and losing an empire without finding a role.
5. Asquith’s 1915 coalition and 1916 split with Lloyd George – killing off the Liberals as a party of government.
6. The end of Old Labour: Jim Callaghan blocking In Place of Strife in 1968 and reaping the whirlwind in 1978-9.
7. The end of Old Labour II: Arthur Scargill calling the miner’s strike without a ballot.
8. Ramsay MacDonald and Phillip Snowden’s rejection of Keynes in the depression.
9. Attlee calling an unnecessary election in 1951 – so losing Labour’s chance to govern the age of affluence.
10. John Major winning the 1992 general election – so setting the Tories on the path to a near death experience.
Posted by: Sunder Katwala | 9 Feb 2008 01:30:35
From it's earliest colonies, America was settled by as great a number of people who wanted to get away from Britain as simply wanted to find fortune. As many as a third of Ulster Scots moved from NI to the colonies prior to the American revolution, going a large way to create a country which would always be looking westward, and which could hardly be contained or remain contented under British law. It's a fool's paradise to think that Britain could have held on to America, when it was settled by so many people who found they wanted to be there, and not be British.
Posted by: Jack Webster | 9 Feb 2008 02:47:09
failing to cover free dental care
abandoning the bowler hat
ripping the old news papers from under me fish & chips
digging a channel tunnel
letting slip the BBC into abyss
Posted by: robert berkhout | 9 Feb 2008 05:28:26
1. Breaking with Rome in the 16th century which destroyed our Catholic Faith and our artistic and musical heritage.
2. George III and our American colonies.
3. Islamic immigration.
Posted by: Benedict Carter | 9 Feb 2008 06:40:42
Churchill's bombing of Dresden. If Churchill had been an obvious baddie, like Hitler, then the rest of the world would not have felt itself justified in all the modern evils that resulted: the threat of nuclear holocaust (still possible), the nuking of Japan, terrorism, abortion, etc. Unsurprising then that the UK has come to parity with the Nazi's in it's treatment of the unborn.
Posted by: Greg Lorriman | 9 Feb 2008 07:23:19
Do you really believe Britain let America go, Barney, and all those who phrase such a statement in that way? Not trying to be snarky, but my dear, we handed your ancestors their hats, and some of them decided to stay on and join us.
I can't imagine the United States would have stayed long under British rule, no way, no how.
Posted by: Jenny | 9 Feb 2008 07:41:36
I cannot agree that losing the American Colonies was a mistake. Maybe it seemed so at the time, but if we had not lost them, we would now be looking back at the winning of the War of Independence and realising what a mistake that was. If we had won, we would probably now be governed from Washington, because the centre of gravity of the Empire must surely have moved westwards eventually. But the idea of Queen Elizabeth living in the White House is an interesting one...
Posted by: Martin | 9 Feb 2008 07:53:08
1. European countries not siding with Constantinople against the Ottoman siege and conquest of it in 1453
2. The Restoration of Charles II, rather than the continuation of the Republic
3. The creation of the Treaty of Versailles
4. The decision by Thatcher not to preserve Britain's manufacturing base in the 1980s
5. The decision by the international community not to demand a full inquiry into 9/11
Posted by: Voland | 9 Feb 2008 08:23:41
What a fascinating overview of the ideological and historical immaturity of modern Britain.
Here's mine - Postmodern history and politics education in the UK!
Posted by: Tom Crisp | 9 Feb 2008 09:19:49
The biggest mistake, I don't know, but the most stupid and the most cruel, has to be the 'Balfour Declaration' of 1917.
A typed message of less than 100 words that has led to hundreds of thousands of deaths in a war of the last sixty years, and the creation of millions of stateless refugees.
The initial step to the creation of Israel was taken as a reward to Dr Chaim Weizmann the leading spokesman for British
Zionists, who developed a process for making acetone, which is essential to the manufacture of cordite, which was in short supply leading up to the 1st World War.
Unfortunately, one vital sentence in the original declaration has been ignored completely:
His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".
So much for the honour of politicians!
Posted by: Roger Leale | 9 Feb 2008 10:00:41
First. Taking the irrevocable step of allowing a very large number of Muslims to settle into this country which will probably lead within 30 years to ethnic cleansing of non-Muslims in large areas of Yorkshire leading to no-go areas and eventual partition of the country in reality if not in law - with a very real possibility of violent conflict to prevent the enlargement of those areas. This has nothing to do with race but culture and the impossibility of reconciling our present culture with militant political Islam.
Second. The stupidity of the current politico-media elite to deny this and to denounce it with fury and accusations of racism.
.
Posted by: Martin | 9 Feb 2008 10:04:21
1 Not supporting Czechoslovakia during the Sudetenland crisis
2 Not helping the German Wehrmacht officers in 1939 in their desire to get rid of Hitler.
3 Not studying in depth the history and methods of the Scientology cult, which is to it's core a totalitarian, anti-democratic organisation.
4 Not taking no.3 seriously and thinking Hubbards mob are just another bunch of religious loonies.
5 Calling Scientology a church and giving it chance to grow.
6 Not looking at the website xenu.tv for all the nasty details
Posted by: Operation Clambake | 9 Feb 2008 10:11:56
1 Not giving Brian Clough the job of managing England.
2 Taking off Bobby Charlton in the match against West Germany in Mexico 1970 instead of the knackered fullback.
Posted by: | 9 Feb 2008 10:19:06
Finkelstein is unquestionably right. In terms of one single policy which alowed the deaths of the most people, Chamberlain's appeasement of Nazi Germany has to be the greatest mistake in British history. Contrary to some of the posts here, we *could* have won a war in 1936 - German rearmament started from the very low level that we had imposed at Versailles, and there is no reason why, properly led, the British and French could not have defeated Hitler together. Hitler's reoccupation of the Rhineland was pure bluff - the German contingency plan in the event of an Allied response was simple retreat. The military conditions to prevent war in 1936 were present - there just wasn't the political will.
The Second World War caused sixty million deaths.
Posted by: Sam | 9 Feb 2008 10:22:22
Allowing Muslims to build mosques in the UK
Posted by: Dominic Stockford | 9 Feb 2008 11:33:05
The Romano-British support of the claimant Emperor Maximus, which failed and badly weakened the Province.
The Norman and subsequent treatment of the English as inferiors in the land, which I feel underpins all manner of social unpleasantness today, including the blame culture and yobbism.
The Hundred Years' War - how could England possibly have kept France? All that horror for a mirage.
Britain's intervention in Greece in 1944. This involved the damning of Communist resistance groups and the installation and support of repressive governments culminating with the military junta of 1967-74 -a harbinger of what Britain and the USA were to do in other countries in the following decades.
Posted by: Nicholas Till | 9 Feb 2008 12:53:27
Allowing the Empire Windrush to dock.
Posted by: tomas | 9 Feb 2008 14:13:28
Exiling Napoleon to Saint Helena for his crime of abiding by the treaty that Britain and her allies,broke.
King Harold, for allowing isolating his regular army by allowing his irregular army to down tools and go back to their farms.
Allowing slavery to be exported(the biggest crime in British history) and then being slow in extinguishing it.
General Clinton, not being ordered by George III to support the Duke of York in the Colonies (a checkmate move).
Exporting the 'tollpuddle martyrs'.
Force feeding Suffragettes.
Not hanging Sir Oswald Moseley.
Closing British Coal Mining (Stupid act 1985)
Posted by: Gary Elsby stoke-on-trent | 9 Feb 2008 14:48:11
Benny Hill.
Posted by: Mike E, Indiana | 9 Feb 2008 16:09:59
Steve McClaren
Posted by: Bear | 9 Feb 2008 18:07:07
Getting rid of the Stuarts.
Posted by: Stephen Butterworth | 9 Feb 2008 18:20:42
Not inventing vaccines before the spread of the Black Death.
Posted by: Bob Doney | 9 Feb 2008 18:23:15
1. Post War Immigration policy - why couldn't this country have followed Japan's example?
2. American access to Britain's overseas markets + debt + technology (nails in the coffin as a world leader) - doing whatever FDR asked that would weaken and inevitably destroy the UK
3. Yalta conference
4. Culture of political correctness gone mad
5. Not doing anything to stop Mao when there were legal pretexts to intervene in China - ie. clandestine terrorist attacks on Hong Kong
6. 1938 appeasement with Hitler
7. Finding oil in the North Sea - and therefore start the start of devolution
8. Mountbatten's partition of the Raj - millions died and the problems remain contemporary
9. Leaving the middle-east mandates for American oil companies
10. Thatcher
Posted by: steven | 9 Feb 2008 19:03:41
Insisting that it was wrong to ever split an infinitive; it shows the English have no idea how their own language is structured, and no clue as to how to effectively use it.
Posted by: Alan Belk | 9 Feb 2008 19:37:55
The shameful sinking of the Belgrano even though it remained outside the exclusion zone ; the non-prosecution of BAE ; the failure to disestablish that minaret of the airwaves - the BBC.
Posted by: anthony faulkner | 9 Feb 2008 21:07:33
Who was it who said history was just one damn thing after another? At any point in time there are forks in the road ahead and Yogi Berra wisely said "take the fork". If a mistake is avoided it is usually at the expense of another.
Posted by: Gallimaufry | 9 Feb 2008 23:27:15
Failure to adopt Benjamin Franklin's program of making British North America the center of a growing British Empire.
Posted by: David Martin | 9 Feb 2008 23:45:36
If WWI had not happened, would not that have put off the inevitable? Remember that in the immediate pre-war years, the ruling houses of the UK (Saxe-Coburg), Germany (Hohenzollern) and Russia (Romanov) were all related: the King, the Kaiser and the Tsar were cousins. Also, none was prepared to take lectures from the others on imperialism, although admittedly Germany under Bismark did pursue it more aggressively.
Britain might still have entered WWI, Entente Cordiale or non, as its justification for entering the war was its pledge to uphold Belgian independence, which Germany had just violated.
However, to me it seems quite likely that the conflagrations in Europe between 1914 and 1945 were a necessary precursor to the liberal and democratic nature of the Europe of today. They purged from the European mindset the imperialistic, militaristic aggression that, among other things, had kept Poland under Prussian hegemony.
That Hitler had no shortage of ordinary Germans who were complicit in the mendacity of the Nazi regime (mass genocide did not become widely known until 1945; even so, the squalid underbelly of the Nazi regime was still visible to those who cared to look for it) suggests to me that the end of the 1914-18 war was unfinished business so far as European attitudes were concerned.
You must remember that in rattling sabres (and occasionally making good on threats of drawing the sword) the ruling classes in Paris, Berlin, London, Vienna, St Petersburg and sundry other territories were following centuries-old traditions. Without the calamity of the European wars of last century, the world - or at least Europe - today might well have ended up a very different and far less liberal place. Yes, war is ghastly; all war is. But the two wars of 1914-1945 purged absolutely, once and for all time, the illiberal attitudes personified by the ruling classes of the time and helped ensure against the threat of atavism. From the ruins of Europe in 1945, a new Germany arose, helped by American aid, and in due course the Soviets withdrew also.
As for mistakes in history, I think Aldous Huxley's short sentence takes some beating: That men seldom learn much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history.
Posted by: Jel Mist | 10 Feb 2008 00:03:07
1. Declaring terra nullius in Australia and now solely blaming white Australians for the terrible treatment of Aborigines.Britain must share the blame - you cannot have it both ways.Australians are doing the best they can to overturn bad British decisions.
2. Not teaching young British travellers that the empire no longer exists.A visitor recently said 'why don't we still own Australia'? Answer: 'Because you ask questions like that'.
3. Similar to the above point. Not teaching British who emmigrate that it is no longer acceptable to change the landscape around you to reflect the English treeless countryside. In Australia we call this the 'pommification' of the land.
4.Not helping Australian troops against the Japanese when the war in Europe was over. After countless Australians gave their lives for the empire in both wars, in return all they got was 'sorry old chap, but we're ok now. You'll have to go it alone old bean'.
Posted by: Greg | 10 Feb 2008 00:09:31
Nationalisation by 1945 Labour Government.
Halting the Suez operation in 1956.
The first dealt a catastrophic blow to the British economy and to international competitiveness, and so impoverishing the nation.
The second dealt a catastrophic blow to Britain's international standing while at the same time handing a spurious victory to Nasser and thereby advancing the cause of anti Western politics in the Middle East.
Posted by: Eve Ventura | 10 Feb 2008 00:11:14
Britain signing the Sykes-Picot Agreement, secretly partioning the Arab world into "spheres of influence" for when WW1 was over. I don't think the Arabs ever forgave us that one...
Posted by: Anthony A | 10 Feb 2008 00:31:50
The past occurred in the way it did because the actions fit the country at the time, and continue to do so.
England richly deserves its heritage of Class-system, racism, greed and stupidity.
Now you have precisely what you wanted, so be happy, Englanders!
Posted by: harry wolf | 10 Feb 2008 00:55:31
1. Not giving Irish Home Rule and murdering the Easter Rising 16.
2. Being Americas' lapdog and defying UN Resolution.
3. Defying the Americans and going ahead with Suez.
4. Giving in to the Russians over the Litvenchenko affair.
5. Not having Tony Benn or Ken Clarke as PM.
6. Killing Thomas a Becket.
7. EEC not EU.
8. Lions led by Donkeys, WW1 (Haig should have been tried by War Tribunal).
9. Losing the American Colonies. (Idiot George III)
10. Allowing Burmese Junta to keep Suu Kyi under House Arrest. Shameful!!!!!
Posted by: Gary Jackson | 10 Feb 2008 01:39:28
Allowing the Burmese junta to survive and keep Suu Kyi under house arrest. SHAME!
Posted by: Gary Jackson | 10 Feb 2008 01:42:12
Fighting World War I; thereby begetting World War II.
Faltering over Suez; thereby presenting us with the current cesspit that is the Middle East.
Ted Heath as PM; thereby begetting the EU.
John Major as PM; thereby begetting Blair & Co.
Posted by: Archie | 10 Feb 2008 01:58:09
1066 - when an homogeneous Anglo-Saxon Scandinavia-facing England was changed irrevocably, and for the worse, and the past became a foreign country
2066 - when England, on present trends, will have become a Balkanised cess-pit of different races, cultures, histories and morals, and the past will truly have become a foreign country.
Posted by: Tom Benford | 10 Feb 2008 02:43:30
This is the most fascinating blog I have ever encountered, and I agree with at least one other person that Jon Livesey's comments were perceptive. Bravo.
If the magnitude of the mistake is judged by damage to Britain, I would say the greatest mistake was to continue the long drawn-out, tragic and terrible trench fighting of World War I, which destroyed the best and brightest talent of a generation and stunted its survivors.
If the mistake is to be judged by the effect on the entire world, it's too complex a question for me. There have been several mistakes I can think of, and they're discussed in this blog by others. I'd love to hear historians discuss the topic.
I don't think Henry VIII's break with Rome was a mistake per se. But, the dissolution of the monasteries and disintegration of the social contract was a sad and cruel mistake.
Interesting to see so many references to Hastings. Had Harold repelled William, who can know where we'd all be, or what our language would be like. One personal observation is that the Norman Conquest led to the construction of Durham Cathedral, and even just aesthetically, that's surely something for which to be thankful!
Posted by: Charles Roemer, Indiana | 10 Feb 2008 05:49:48
The loss of our Merchant Navy and the rise of flags of convenience.
Posted by: Ian Smith | 10 Feb 2008 08:35:18
1.I would have to say that the ultimate mistake would have to have been that gas not killing hitler in ww1, I know that there may have been some other replacement, and there may have still been war, but at least the germans wouldnt have followed a self rightous,egotistical madman!
2. Letting the PC Brigade have so much say in this country.
3. Not moving the country further away from Europe :)
As for other mistakes, well nation as great as ours was, had to happen now and then ;-)
Posted by: Ben | 10 Feb 2008 09:03:57
The Balfour declaration, in breaking up the Ottoman Empire into artificial nations (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon etc) cutting across tribal and nationality frontiers which are the source of much of the present Middle East problems today.
Posted by: KW | 10 Feb 2008 12:29:24
I can echo many of the already-posted sentiments so I shall confine my views to more recent history:-
1. Electing New Labour to power.
2. Appeasement of radical islam within our borders
3. Complete abdication of control over who comes in, who goes out and who stays.
4. Complete abandonment of youth, preferring to steal cut-price skilled labour from less advantaged countries instead of training our own people to plumb, build, etc like we used to, thus giving them a sense of purpose, direction and hope for a meaningful and worthwhile future. Instead, they hang around on corners intimidating people, smashing their property, stealing, assaulting and all too often shooting and stabbing.
5. Constantly being told to feel guilty over and apologise for the actions of our great-great-great-great-grandfathers , who lived in a very different time and by a very different set of standards. Guys; the slave trade was not my fault, I was not involved, and I refuse to apologise for it. Why don't we be thankful instead that our society and culture evolved and developed? Remember, it was Britain that was the first to abolish slave-trading by law - a law we enforced on other nations with our Navy, leading to the eventual complete end of subjugation of others in the developed world.
Posted by: Sam Hopkins | 10 Feb 2008 13:25:23
Crushing the independence and rights of other peoples over 1000 years of history seems like a good one.
Posted by: alex farley | 10 Feb 2008 13:38:46
1. Muslim immigration.
2. Un-Christian division; siding with Frank-dominated Roman schismatics against orthodox Churches in 1054.
3. The establishment of the Church of England.
4. Cromwell in Ireland.
5. Taxation without representation in the American colonies.
6. Tony Blair
7. Adrian IV.
8. 1930s pacifism.
Posted by: Brian Akira | 10 Feb 2008 15:24:16
Harry Wolf writes that "Being Americas' lapdog and defying UN Resolution" was a mistake.
Could you please tell me which Resolution you are referring to?
A Resolution number and date would be appreciated.
Posted by: Brian Akira | 10 Feb 2008 15:28:40
This is about BRITISH mistakes, not English ones. So we must forget about any before our Civil War.
In my lifetime the greatest British mistakes (by far) in foreign policy were Munich and not joining the European Communities when they first started. In domestic policy, the leading errors were Attlee's nationalisations, and our continuing failure to educate a large part of our population to the level they need and deserve.
Before I was born, I think the key mistakes were not reforming the House of Commons in the 1750's -which would have permitted American members and an eventual federal British Empire of most of the world; and missing the chance in the 1890s when there was a second opportunity to form such an Empire, though without the Americans. Either would probably have prevented the World Wars, and delivered surer, more free and more peacable development to much of the world.
Posted by: Diversity | 10 Feb 2008 16:16:33
Scotland's biggest mistakes:
1) The Auld Alliance - The alliance with France committed Scotland to European conflicts which were nothing to do with us, resulting in catastrophic defeats at Flodden Field (1513) and Vernieul (Hundred Years War).
2) The Reformation - We should have stayed Catholic. We would have been more unified as a country during the 16th and 17th Centuries had the Reformation been nipped in the bud.
3) Darien - The failure of this badly conceived project led to the destitution of the country and the Act of Union.
4) The Act of Union - We gave up our precious independence in order to get access to the English Empire and its foreign markets. A heavy price to pay.
5) 1970's - We missed a great opportunity to take Scotland forward as an independent nation. The Empire was defunct, the EU was rising to take its place, and the oil had just started flowing. Big mistake. By 2008 Scotland could have been a dynamic, modern state, an equal amongst the community of nations, while England could have dispensed with the baggage of post-imperial delusions and the 'Scottish question' (which is hanging over their heads constantly these days) and forged their own path.
England's biggest mistakes:
1) Being invaded by the Romans.
2) Being invaded by the Normans.
3) Being invaded by us Scots. But the Act of Union was kind of forced on us, to be fair, so you were asking for it for allowing us in by the back door.
4) Idolising warmongering twits like Edward I, Edward III, Henry V, and Henry VIII. I would venture that Henry VII was a better role-model.
5) Getting involved in World War One. Bankrupted the whole of the UK and achieved nothing.
Posted by: Davie | 10 Feb 2008 16:44:31
Suppressing Hook Nosed Aristotle, creator of the only true scientific philosopher; and turning to Neo-Platonism; Aristotle's basic idea was the Species Genera Distinction, which existed in Babylonia, amongst the Levite Bureaucrats brought there by Nebuchananezzar. and replacing these with Neo-Platonisms. Now Universities and Government are filled with disciples of the Neo-Platonist Gramski (Italian Communist Leader) Hell-Bent on Destroying Britain and Western Civilization from with it.
Posted by: Xeno77777 | 10 Feb 2008 17:44:44
A number of posts list entering WW1 as a mistake. A mistake is only a mistake if there was a clear better course of action. Otherwise it is a regrettable necessity. Had we renaged on our treaty obligations and not entered WW1 France would without a doubt have lost. We would have ended up facing a empowered aggressive Germany only this time it would have been on our own.
Given the enormous difficulties in fighting WW1 the victory ranks as one of our greatest national achievement.
Posted by: charlie | 10 Feb 2008 18:01:42
When the Kantists took over South Viet Nam, they put the Buddahists and the Thomists into POW Concentration Camps for 20, 30, years and life. The English Speaking Nations need to Restore Aristotle and the Natural Law, and do to the Kantists what they did to the South Vietnamese Thomists and Buddahists, and put the Nazi Soldier Pope, and all Gramskites with them. Clergy must be licenced, and have a degree in Aristotle and the Natural Law. Gramskites in government and clergy, Neo-Platoist Kantians all, aim to destroy the West, nation by nation. The Britain, US, and other English Speaking Nations and Nordic Nations need New Oliver Cromwells, to destroy this evil.
Posted by: Xeno77777 | 10 Feb 2008 18:02:02
WOMEN'S LIB
Posted by: Shirley Bowen | 10 Feb 2008 18:38:49
1. Declaring World War 2 with Germany. We should have made peace with Hitler and persuaded the Nazis not to have the Holocaust.
2. Not assassinating Stalin at the end of World War 2. Assassinating Stalin would have set back the Soviets in their offensive aims.
3. The Single European Act. This one's down to Lady Thatcher.
Posted by: Michael Cawood | 10 Feb 2008 19:11:39
Thinking it is still a global force. An American lackey would be more appropriate.
Posted by: John Taylor | 10 Feb 2008 19:27:59
ISRAEL...must be the no.1 mistake. It has global reverberations and is a safe haven for Jewish criminals the world over.
EU...allowing unrestricted access for all new EU indabitants. Poles now have 1 in 3 babies born in the UK, and as for tax, they take advantage of a loophole which allows them to claim back all tax paid if they return home for a short while after15-18 months working in the UK.
Blair...giving him 2 terms in which to show his undying love for Bush and take us headfirst into a bloody quagmire.
Posted by: riz | 10 Feb 2008 21:21:27
Joining the Eu
Allowing the EU to abolish our parliament
Furthering the aims of the EU
Becoming a region of the EU
Not leaving the EU
Posted by: Mark Smith | 10 Feb 2008 22:05:51
Islamic immigration and multi-culturalism in general. Neither is, or was ever wanted by the great majority. Our children will be driven out of England because we allowed traitors to control our borders, and before this we must all suffer increasing feelings of alienation in our own country.
Posted by: Martin Robertson | 10 Feb 2008 23:36:36
New Labour. Britain has not suffered so much damage since 1066.
Posted by: PaulD | 10 Feb 2008 23:58:11
Monika Danneman not reacting quickly enough to Jimi Hendrix mixing barbiturates with alcohol...
Posted by: M Davidson | 11 Feb 2008 00:41:37
The Act of Union 1707.For Scotland this was an unmitigated disaster that
virtually destroyed their nation hood.
Posted by: Jim MacDonald | 11 Feb 2008 03:48:40
The continual over accommodating for the beliefs and traditions of settlers into the United Kingdom, thereby allowing ghettos to form and control / change certain aspec