Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT BLOGS Comment Central

Comment Central - Times Online - WBLG

« When Government branding goes wrong... | All Posts | Magazine Rack - Issue 211 »

April 23, 2008

The faulty memory of Gordon Brown

Gordon Brown is on the television talking about the 10p tax rate. He said, as if making a drop dead brilliant argument against the Tories, that the 10p tax rate wasn't the best way of dealing with poverty.

Hang on. He introduced it. He introduced it! Gordon Brown introduced the 10p tax rate.

Posted by Daniel Finkelstein on April 23, 2008 at 12:32 PM in Gordon Brown | Permalink Bookmark and Share

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451586c69e200e551f5ab068833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The faulty memory of Gordon Brown:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Daniel, he introduced the 10p rate as a transitional phase before other poverty-reducing measures were fully effective and developed.

Posted by: Wilfred | 23 Apr 2008 12:53:49

This is a staggering instance of the Prime Minister's brazenness.

Martin Kettle in Monday's Guardian reveals another*.

Why is it that Labour MPs, unlike Conservative and Lib Dem MPs, made so little fuss about the abolition of the 10 percent tax band announced in last year's Budget? According to Mr Kettle:

"... it is too easy to lump all the blame on backbenchers. Much of the real blame lies on Treasury ministers [Gordon Brown and Ed Balls]. They did not tell the truth within the Labour ranks about the 2007 budget."

"did not tell the truth" = "lied". There's more.

According to Mr Kettle, Tony Blair asked Gordon Brown some days before the Budget how many people would be adversely affected by the change:

"I am informed that he told Blair that the number would be about 25,000."

This figure is out by several million and the question arises how to account for the disparity. Mr Kettle tries three explanations and concludes that:

"The gap between what Brown said to Blair and what is now acknowledged is so great that it appears fairly clear that Brown gave Blair false information. My information is that Blair thinks this is the case."

"gave Blair false information" = "lied to Blair"?

The allegation, then, is that the man who is now Prime Minister lied to the man who was then Prime Minister and, together with the man who is now Education Secretary, lied to the parliamentary party.

The allegation is made on the basis of what Tony Blair thinks is the case.

And the allegation has not been denied.

----------

* http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/martin_kettle/2008/04/the_10p_crisiss_biggest_loser.html

Posted by: David Moss | 23 Apr 2008 13:13:00

Ecky thump, David Moss, first it was Blair that was accused of "lies", now it's Brown, on the evidence of the "liar" Blair. For my part, I'm glad we have politicians who act like real politicians and not like Big Brother contestants, emoting and baring their souls to the world. Politicians, diplomats and intelligent lovers know how to tailor their statements in order to achieve their goals, which may be altruistic. David Moss, did you ever pause to ask yourself why people like Brown are in politics? No doubt you'll say it's for his own benefit. I'm afraid you may be projecting your own aims onto his. Now THAT'S how to do psycho-babble!

Posted by: Wilfred | 23 Apr 2008 19:14:50

As ever, we look to Peter Riddell.

As ever, he provides.

"Brazenness" is the wrong word. What Mr Brown has is "Presbyterian chutzpah".

Posted by: David Moss | 24 Apr 2008 08:53:07

To recap, Martin Kettle said in Monday's Guardian [1] that Gordon Brown and Ed Balls lied to Labour backbenchers and that Gordon Brown lied to Tony Blair and that he, Mr Kettle, has this on the authority of Mr Blair.

Michael White, Assistant Editor of the Guardian and a former Political Editor of the Guardian, asked the question yesterday how much has the 10p tax row damaged Gordon Brown? [2] "The waters are now likely to close over the 10p system", he concluded, "life moves on quickly".

Not that quickly, judging by the comments elicited by his article.

He gallantly returns to the subject today [3] and asks "did Brown deceive MPs in 2007, or himself?" He provides no answer, saying instead that "most voters are less interested in the finer points of U-turns than politicians and pundits".

He may be right but the tangy comments on his article suggest that his readers would still like an answer to the question. Here is a flavour:

"So they are either stupid and callous, or just stupid and incompetent. Or they are stupid, callous and incompetent.

And you Mike are urging us to vote Labour, no thanks, the Tories will get my vote for the first time in my life." (April 24, 2008 10:45 AM)

and

"As recently as the 19th of this month he told journalists on the flight back from the United States.
'No one will lose out.'

I'll repeat that: 'No one will lose out'. At the same time Darling told the Today programme that the Treasury knew precisely how many people will lose out. Brown was privy to those figures.

Brown also lied when saying Angela Smith called him to say she wasn't resigning. As Nick Robinson replied to Brown: 'She phoned you up at the White House to tell you she wasn't resigning? Do all your Ministers do that?'"

So the question remains, the waters have not closed over -- is Tony Blair right that Gordon Brown a liar?

----------

1. http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/martin_kettle/2008/04/the_10p_crisiss_biggest_loser.html

2. http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/04/turning_on_tenpence.html

3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/apr/24/economy.alistairdarling

Posted by: David Moss | 24 Apr 2008 13:14:29

I guess if Tony Bliar calls Gordo a liar he is probably right, after all he knows the criteria.

Posted by: tone | 27 Apr 2008 17:05:45

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

  • Your writers

    Daniel Finkelstein,
    is Chief Leader Writer of The Times and writes a weekly column. Comment Central is his rolling guide to the best opinion on the web.
    Hattie Garlick, the Online Comment Editor, will also be posting.

    Send us an email

    Click here for more information on the blog.

    Latest posts

    Latest comments

    Categories

    Select from the dropdown

You might also like...

  • 2008 Presidential election
  • Cassilis
  • Justin Webb's America
  • Boulton and Co.
  • Benedict Brogan
  • Dizzy Thinks
  • Chris Dillow
  • The Fink Tank
  • Daniel's Weekly Column
  • Oliver Kamm
  • Stephen Pollard
  • Iain Dale
  • Nick Robinson
  • Guido Fawkes
  • Conservative Home
  • Clive Davis
  • Arts & Letters Daily
  • Real Clear Politics
  • Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish
  • Marbury
  • Mickey Klaus
  • Political Betting
  • Times Online Weblogs
  • Times Comment

News from
Times Online

  • UK
  • Crime
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Political
  • Science
  • World
  • Iraq
  • US
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Asia
  • Africa
  • Technology
  • Business
  • US Elections
Other Times Online blogs
  • Crime Central
  • Faith Central
  • Urban Dirt
  • Alpha Mummy
  • BabyBarista
  • Ariel Leve
  • Charles Bremner
  • Inside Iraq
  • Irwin Stelzer
  • Mary Beard (TLS)
  • Money Central
  • News
  • Sports Commentary
  • Peter Stothard (TLS)
  • Richard Lloyd Parry
  • Ruth Gledhill
  • Tech Central
  • The Game

Feeds

Get the latest news and comments via RSS

Use the buttons below to add the feeds to your RSS reader, or right the links above, click and choose "save target as", then paste the url into your RSS reader.

For more information on using RSS, and for more feeds from Times Online, visit

the main RSS page

Bloglines
Google
Yahoo!
Netvibes

For older posts, visit the archive

  • 2006
  • 2007
  • Jan 2008
  • Feb 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009