But apart from the girlfriends, Mr Clegg...
With all the coverage about Nick Clegg's girlfriends, you might have thought that was all there was in the GQ interview.
But actually it was a car crash on every bend in the road.
Nick Clegg, for all his obvious charm and intelligence, seems incapable of seeing an interview question coming and incapable of gently deflecting it.
Read this extraordinary exchange on Iraq:
Piers Morgan: Was the invasion of Iraq illegal?
Nick Clegg: There's a strong case to suggest it was in breach of UN resolutions, yes.PM: So, assuming it was illegal, would it be justified for Iraqis to exact revenge on Britain?
NC: I don't think you remedy an act of violence like that.PM: If Iraq had invaded Britain illegally, you would have said it was morally justified for us to attack them back, wouldn't you?
NC: Yes, I probably would.PM: So why is it not morally justified for them to attack us back?
NC: I wish it was that simple.PM: If it is morally certain one way, surely it has to be the other way, too?
NC: No, you are repeating the error of Blair and Bush, this Old Testament view of moral rigidity that says you compound one thing with another.PM: If Iran illegally bombs London next month, should we retaliate?
NC: Of course we should.PM: But you say it is not morally justified for Iraqis to attack us?
NC: Because foreign affairs cannot be driven with absolute moral precision.PM: I don't understand why Iraqis don't have a moral right to attack us if you say we illegally invaded them.
NC: I can see how people could construct a moral justification. But I don't think the morality of invading Iraq is expunged by them attacking us.PM: I'm baffled. If Iraq invaded us, you would say it was morally justified to strike back, but it's not morally justified for them to do it to us even if our invasion was illegal?
NC: If you are invaded illegally, then clearly you feel you have a moral justification. But that isn't a sensible way to conduct foreign affairs. Bush and Blair waged war on Iraq through misplaced moral certainty.
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.


The poor man would seem - although self-praise is no praise - better at bed-hopping than the political interview. I wonder what his numerous and sundry partners thought of his pillow talk during the post coitum cigarette: Simply gorgeous, darling - until he opened his mouth...
Posted by: Julian Cox | 8 Apr 2008 15:05:31
At Morgan's first, smug question, Clegg should have shot back: "Is it morally justifiable for a newspaper editor to fake photographs, an act which could lead to the deaths of British soldiers?"
Posted by: Wilfred | 8 Apr 2008 15:53:43
Think it just shows the danger of convoluting what is legal and what is moral and also the knots you twist yourself into when you are too timid to say: I'm right, you're wrong; we, as a democratic nation, are better arbiters of what is moral and what is not than a dictatorship.
Posted by: Alex R | 8 Apr 2008 16:04:34
Piers has a point though.
Posted by: Guido Fawkes | 8 Apr 2008 20:30:19
Daniel,
Why don't you answer as Clegg should have.
Posted by: Alex R | 9 Apr 2008 12:45:31