Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT Blogs
Comment Central - Daniel Finkelstein's rolling guide to opinion on the web

Comment Central - Times Online - WBLG

« Power schmower... | All Posts | Today's Web Grab »

May 09, 2008

Top ten Obama Vice Presidential picks

So it's Obama. But who's going to fill the second slot on the Democratic ticket?

UPDATE: Vote in our poll here

1) Hillary Clinton

Many believe Obama will have to offer the VP slot to Clinton. Andrew Sullivan called it the hate-filled dream ticket. But will she accept it? If Obama loses, she may see a 2012 race opening up before her.

Al_for_vp 2) Al Gore

He's certainly got the experience. But the eco-warrior probably has no desire to return to Pennsylvania Avenue. Winning his endorsement would have set Obama up for the nomination. Does he need Gore any more?

3) John Edwards

A serious contender. The North Carolina Senator ran with John Kerry in 2004 and would bring the Southern link currently missing in Obama's campaign. But would he want to do it again? And would Obama feel Edwards should have been with him earlier?

Kathleen_sebelius4) Kathleen Sebelius

Sebelius's name has been cropping up more and more frequently. The two-term Governor of Kansas fills in many of the gaps in Obama's support base. She may not have much foreign policy experience but she'll bring a red state with her. And a female Vice-President might help soothe Clinton's supporters. One to watch.

5) Bill Richardson

Also extremely likely. Pundits state that he's been running for VP since the beginning. He brings foreign policy experience and the Hispanic vote with him.

Wesley_clark_2 6) Wesley Clark

A former four-star general, Wes Clark served in Kosovo and studied PPE at Oxford. He would lend Obama military clout and cross party-lines in his appeal.

7) Jim Webb

The junior Virginia senator since 2006. He could provide the machismo that Obama needs. A military man with a son in Iraq, he's regarded as one of the most authoritative Democratic voices on the conflict. Known to carry a loaded pistol on occasion.  As a former Reagan man he would add to Obama's cross party appeal and make it slightly harder to paint the candidate as an unrepentant liberal.

8) Robert Casey

The Pennsylvania senator has already endorsed Obama. As VP, he would help out in the white working-class states. And his Catholic faith would reach out to an important voting bloc. 

Oprah_and_obama9) Oprah Winfrey

She's already one of America's most powerful women. Could DC be next on her world-domination agenda? Just a thought.

10) Joe Biden

Might he be the first Biden in a thousand generations to run for President? A senator since 1972, his presidential runs have never taken off. But his international experience might make him a good choice and he'd appeal to the white male vote. His description of Obama as 'clean' didn't do him any favours though. And some think he is more likely to be Secretary of State.   

Posted by Daniel Finkelstein on May 9, 2008 in 2008 Presidential election | Permalink | Comments (159) | TrackBack (1) | Email this post

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/297284/28920080

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Top ten Obama Vice Presidential picks:

» Archbishop to Obama veep candidate Sebelius: Stop from Marathon Pundit
But a Papal bullet may may prove fatal to her chances. The last thing the junior senator from Illinois needs is a religion controversy involving his running mate. Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City, Kansas says Sebelius should not accept the... [Read More]

Tracked on May 11, 2008 at 05:05 AM

Comments

I think you overestimate Wes Clark's cross-party appeal - and possibly even his military clout. He's not well liked either within the military bureaucracy or by the GOP. Probably Jim Webb would be a better pick on those grounds.

Also think Bob Casey might be a bad choice. I'm glad he beat Rick Santorum, but I hear on the grapevine that he's pretty dull on a number of levels. True, the Catholicism thing might be a boon, but I think that if appealing to the white working class is the thing, yet again Jim Webb looks better.

Posted by: Anthony | 9 May 2008 16:31:22

"Brings the Hispanic vote"? "Reach out to an all-important voting bloc"? Really, do you intend to suggest that Americans vote 'en bloc' according to personal characteristic, and that they will only vote for candidates with whom they share that characteristic?

Posted by: Philip Walker | 9 May 2008 17:01:48

Dead Wrong. Obama will most likely choose Evan Bayh, former Governor and now Senator from Indiana. He needs to pick a moderate Democrat from a red state and turn it into a blue state.

Posted by: Jon Kaarbø | 9 May 2008 17:46:49

STRONG COMMENTS:

1) HILLARY CLINTON: Yeaaack! Not a chance! However, he has been highly kidsy-glovesy and kissy kissy with her...to an almost fatal extent! Will he make this BIG mistake?

2) AL GORE: ha- ha- ha- ha- haaaa!
Dani, at least you have a good sense of humour! He's a very nice boy, but he has Global Warming on the brain!

3)JOHN EDWARDS: Quizas, perhaps...but no!

4)KATHLEEN SIBELIUS: They could make sweet music together!

5)BILL RICHARDSON: Who? Ok, YES!...but....NO!

6)WESLEY CLARK: Best bet! Attennn- shunn!!!! Heavy, heavy!!!

7)Jim Webb: Loaded pistol? uh - uh!
No - No! Obama needs to stay away from those.

8) ROBERT CASEY: Casey closed!

9) OPRAH WINFREY: Dynamite! Intruiging. Trouble is that her cajones are bigger that his. Who do you think would end up being the real President? Who was President when Bill Clinton was president ..and getting blown in the Oval Office? On the other hand they would probably be the most honest team since Eisenhower was in office!!!! Just what the USA urgently needs.

10) JOE BIDEN: No go, Joe!

Posted by: GARTH STRONG | 9 May 2008 18:22:49

Really, do you intend to suggest that Americans vote 'en bloc' according to personal characteristic, and that they will only vote for candidates with whom they share that characteristic?

Why in some cases Yes just look at the support for Clinton. despite showing every sign of being CRAZY.
Catholics and white women voted for her in enough numbers to make it drag on this far

Posted by: andrew frost | 9 May 2008 18:26:01

I think Oprah is madly in love with Obama. If they make a team then he will, unfortunately, win.
It should be obvious by now that Obama
hates Hillary's guts! Kathleen bears a striking resemblance to her, so she may get picked.

Posted by: Sue Melin | 9 May 2008 18:51:40

Why do you continue to think Al Gore would ever, ever run for Vice President, when he could have had the Presidency easily.

Some more thoughts on the Veepstakes: http://http://airingofthegrievances.blogspot.com/2008/05/whos-eleventh-most-influential-jew-in.html

Posted by: Jonathan | 9 May 2008 19:46:04

He should call Ron Paul.

Posted by: Olddog | 9 May 2008 20:30:47

Scratch Webb, Bayh, or Mark Warner. These three are needed to hold (or in Warner's case win) would-be Republican senate seats. It doesn't make sense to damage your majority in the Senate like that.

Ed Rendell seems the most fitting choice, as he would help with the divide within the party as well as the appeal to working class whites.

Posted by: Chris Swanson | 9 May 2008 20:47:38

Here's what Kathleen Sebelius brings to the ticket: She is a Catholic, so all the Catholic-haters will be alienated. She is rabidly pro-abortion, having vetoed a partial birth abortion ban and a bill to provide state inspections of abortion clinics, so the church going Catholics and the fundamentalists will be alienated. Her surrogate filed a lawsuit with the Kansas Supreme Court to get them to raise taxes in Kansas over the objection of the legislature, in violation of the separation of powers doctrine in the Kansas Constitution. Besides that, she has all the magnetism and charisma of a month old banana. Please Barack, do youself a favor. Put her on the ticket. Get her out of Kansas.

Posted by: Tony Francis | 9 May 2008 20:49:27

Not sure if this has been mentioned yet, but why not Obama/Bloomberg? That would allow the Dems to become an incredibly appealing Economic ticket (I know that the Dems should automatically be getting a lot of votes because the republicans are the party that screwed up the economy, but many voters seem to think mccain will be able to improve the economy).
Imagine a debate between Bloomberg and Romney (if say Mccain were to choose Romney as his running mate). Romney's supposed economic wisdom would be completely eliminated and he would then be bringing nothing to the republican ticket. On the other hand Bloomberg can point to New York's public economic success rather than how Romney can only talk about how he made his own personal fortune. (Bloomberg also made a personal fortune but he clearly has more political experience dealing with the macro-economy. Bloomberg was also considering a presidential bid last year (although obviously once he saw the Obama and Hilary support there was no reason for him to waste his time and money), but I truly think Bloomberg would be a great fit for the ticket. Anyone agree?

Posted by: Mike S | 9 May 2008 21:09:30

What about Sen. Claire McCaskill? I think she would be a great running mate!

Posted by: Tony | 9 May 2008 21:18:31

Joseph Leiberman.

- first, because it will keep some deranged klansman from blowing Obama's head off

- second, because if he doesn't choose Leiberman, McCain will.

Posted by: ringo | 9 May 2008 21:22:46

Not sure why you included the silly ones. Casey? Winfrey? GORE? C'mon.

Evan Bayh would be a fine choice, as somebody else mentioned. It's a shame that Mark Warner is running for the Senate, otherwise he'd be the obvious pick. Sibelius would be a wonderful choice...actually, so would her dad, but he's 86 now. However, I'm sure he'd work hard to bring Ohio to her and Obama.

I would put Sibelius #1, Richardson #2, Bayh #3

Posted by: Matthew H | 9 May 2008 21:33:16

ABC... Anybody But Clinton.. He chooses her at the expense of my vote (and I suspect many others). She's earned nothing but disdain! Seriously... How could he put her on the ticket when the only thing she's said the past 2 months is he can't be elected! She burnt her bridges. Its time for her (and bill) to retire.

No Senators especially the "old politics ones" but many because they're needed where they are. I still remember almost breaking my TV watching Joe Biden on Charlie Rose pimping the Iraqi Invasion. Everyone knew that was folly. Joe should join Hillary in retirement.

Gore? forget it... is busy selling carbon credit scams.

Clark? No way... we've had it with the war mongers, especially Clinton supporters.

Edwards? No.. He's going to be busy being attorney general then Supreme court.

Webb maybe.. but what's this book he wrote? baggage.

Richardson.. yes brings the hispanic affinity vote.

Sebelius.. Yes ...brings a red state and women affinity vote. I like either one of those two.

Don't forget Sam Nunn.. I like his stock too (check intrade.com)

Posted by: Ned in Placitas | 9 May 2008 21:38:18

Kathleen Sebelius gave the Democratic response to the last State of the Union Address and put everyone to sleep. And notably those supporting Hillary will not accept just any woman.... and what woman could even come close to Hillary?

Robert Casey is also BORING... and he could not even deliver his district (Scranton) to Obama... in fact Obama did very poorly there.

John Edwards... Been there, did that.... and he actually was not bulldog enough running as VP. Need someone with sharp teeth.

Same for Wesley Clark as he showed when he ran last time...not hungry enough for high office... and since he is a Hillary supporter, he may also not have his heart in it.

At least Oprah Winfrey had "judgement" enough to leave the church of Rev. Wright.

Jim Webb and Obama would be like oil and water... more so than Hillary and Obama. Such would be a contentious match.

Bill Richardson could not even get the Hispanics to vote for him when he was running for President. And he is too wimpy to stand up to the GOP and defend his presidential candidate.

Al Gore is way past playing second fiddle to anyone.

Joe Biden is the only sane choice... except he is from Delaware and probably thus will not be considered.

My opinion on Hillary is that she will make the smart choice is asked to be VP running mate.

Posted by: Nickberry | 9 May 2008 21:41:25

Bill Richardson is the one I find most preferable. Now that the rancor of the primary season will soon be over, it will be good to have someone like him who speaks softly in a reasoned manner. He would help the voters forget about Hillary and her negative campaigning.

The one drawback is that he switched allegiance from Hillary to Obama after having served in two appointed positions under Bill Clinton. He might be seen as a turncoat. But he has the least baggage of any of the ten listed.

Posted by: Randall, from out West in the USA | 9 May 2008 21:42:19

These are interesting, but only 3 are viable. I listed them in order of likeliness:

Obama/Webb
Obama/Richardson
Obama/Clinton

Good day.

Posted by: Smart one | 9 May 2008 22:27:42

The biggest question....

Will HRC supporters not vote or go with McCain if he doesn't pick her? McCain has a 9 point lead in Florida right now (Real Clear Politics), not to mention a 3.4 point lead in ohio... you can't be a dem and take the presidency without these two states! Hillary on the ticket is actually more viable than everyone's thinking. Gore won't take another vice presidency... been there, done that... Edwards is doubtful, he didn't push Kerry over the top.

HRC is my guess, many will be upset if he doesn't pick her. She deserves it. Remember Johnson and Kennedy!

Posted by: Brian C. | 9 May 2008 22:41:54

The biggest question....

Will HRC supporters not vote or go with McCain if he doesn't pick her? McCain has a 9 point lead in Florida right now (Real Clear Politics), not to mention a 3.4 point lead in ohio... you can't be a dem and take the presidency without these two states! Hillary on the ticket is actually more viable than everyone's thinking. Gore won't take another vice presidency... been there, done that... Edwards is doubtful, he didn't push Kerry over the top.

HRC is my guess, many will be upset if he doesn't pick her. She deserves it. Remember Johnson and Kennedy!

Posted by: Brian C. | 9 May 2008 22:42:07

Andrew Frost, what about all of the black people who consistently vote for Obama at a rate of over 90%??? Funny how people conveniently ignore the obvious!

Posted by: Carolina | 9 May 2008 22:50:27

Obama/ Hillary...if not they lose all Hillary's supporters and lose to McCain.

Posted by: John Pen | 9 May 2008 23:05:17

I would pick John Edwards for VP Just a thought!!!! The rest is History!!
Lil

Posted by: Lillian R. Dean | 9 May 2008 23:17:50

Casey did a great job helping Obama win Pennsy... oh, I forgot...

Posted by: dan Buchwald | 9 May 2008 23:55:06

IF he chooses Hillary...or Al, then I will vote Republican.

Posted by: Kate Harvey | 10 May 2008 00:30:21

there are some picks from native america*
winona laduke who ran with ralph nader.
she calls the 500,000 strong native american church* a grouping who ordinarly don*t vote at all.the circle around them is large and strong*america would finally make peace with native america* we don*t even have a native american national holliday*never mind the poverty on some reservations is massave* lowest mortality rate,lowest birth rate,and highest unimployment in the country* with the poorest run health service thats government opperated*

Posted by: jerry strong heart | 10 May 2008 00:41:15

You mentioned neither of the two best choices as a running mate for Obama, Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana and Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania. I'm not sure how any serious list could overlook those two. Pretty puzzling.

Posted by: Doug | 10 May 2008 00:51:28

My own personal Dream Ticket would be Obama and Colin Powell, but thats just me.

Posted by: Barbara-USA | 10 May 2008 00:54:29

I think Kathleen Sebelius, would be a better idea than Hillary. Past History would taint his leadership with sleaze. Hillary & Bill it would be full of confrontations and no unity. Bill Richardson who is honest and a strong supporter. Who had positive things to say. Hillary on the other hand had played Race, Played with FOX NEWS, on the Rev Wright sound bites when Hillary & Bill both know Rev Wright and also knew none of what was being said was true, I call it decietful. Hillary would be working behind the seen to bring down a government, it would be a desaster.For that I agree with the Kennedy's I personally sees Hillary as some one that I could not trust. The way she knew about the Florida Michigan situation from the start, and now later want to change the rules to suit her self when every one knew the rules, and Hillary thinks she is a special case. Then there is the case pending against her & her husband for Electorial FRAUD, she would be a very bad choice indeed. Joe Biden was a person I have a lot of respect for, and he was against the war all along, which I also saw as a very bad & stupid decision. It has caused lives, it has caused a run on the economy due to lack of investments. Oil prices aiming towards 200 US dollars per barrel. McCain's economic policies will have no merit while aiming to be in Iraq, and a pending war with Iran, and the evangelical' s such as Hagee who want end times, also want a war with with RUSSIA as well and because the Russians knows this they are now flexing their muscle, the only country the envangelical seem to be interested in, America attacking are the ones with oil. America is a desperate country, a country desperate to survive in an old system that has burnt it self out. A Country that lacks vision in the direction it needs to go in these troubled times. Most people whom are moderate will have already recogonised that America is verging on the old system of all EMPIRES DIE, and America without the insite that death is inevitable, for us all, as well as disfuntional Empires, History has shown that time and time again, So lets look at a few who committed crimes against its own citizens, and against the world, Most of Europe & America, and ancient times Rome & Egypt. Their Empires died and cursed by their evil deeds. I do not think America will be spared, because Biblically it stated that their evil had reached clear up to Heaven due to the enormity of their crimes. The American government thinks that they can find life on Mars, and it matters not what they do to Planet Earth. But Man has no other planet on which he can survive, and if it were possible, it would remain elusive, because to destroy one planet to move to another to destroy, regardless of which order man would destroy the whole world, because they are trying to compete with nature, what is real to what man has tried to invent which lack truth and accuracy. Politicans by nature are VIPERS & liars who lack one thing they promise things they have not got in their powers to acheive, because theirs days and years are numbered, they are classified as the Beast of Revelations, wild beasts because they plunder and rape the innocence of the vonerable who put trust in Political criminals, as a result we have the toughest time in recorded HISTORY global warming with economic desaster, Oil shortages, food shortages, wars, desease, extintions of animal & plant life because the wild beast cannot be contained, their desperation for power and the reality of what man is faced with, is different for the wild beast and what is nature.His number is 666.

Posted by: Daphne Kenward | 10 May 2008 00:55:24

Having Hillary along for the ride would be like bringing the "Bride Of Chucky"

Posted by: Olddog | 10 May 2008 01:10:11

Andrew,

Just a little rejoinder about Hillary Clinton. In you post you stated that:
"Yes just look at the support for Clinton. despite showing every sign of being CRAZY.
Catholics and white women voted for her in enough numbers to make it drag on this far" ...

Remember, Senator Obama draw 90 plus percent of the African-American vote, a far higher proportion than Senator Clinton does in Catholics and white women.

As for being crazy ... if Senator Obama wins let's see where we are in 2012 ...

Posted by: Andre Carrington | 10 May 2008 01:10:42

Wes Clark is a thousand times more qualified to be president than Obama. A THOUSAND TIMES.

Bob Casey wouldn't even guarantee PA goes into the blue column in 08, his father was a popular figure here, he is not.

Posted by: velvetdays | 10 May 2008 01:20:23

Richardson will not bring Latinos. Latinos value loyalty.
Sebelius has little traction for women. She threw women under the bus to go for Obama.

Posted by: Maria Gratia from Florida | 10 May 2008 01:33:03

Obama should distance himself from Hillary just like he did from his minister. Hillary is a bigger liability. We remember what a national disgrace Bill was and many voters will not want either of them anywhere near the White House ever again. Bill will not behave any better just because he is First Husband. Do we really want to give him another chance to embarrass the nation? Hillary looked the other way back then so she could get where she is today. They both suffer from Truth Deficit Disorder.

Posted by: L Watson | 10 May 2008 02:12:11

When will Obama play the white card? After all he's half'n half Kenyan. So if you believe in voter blocs -- he's gotta appeal to Clinton's gun & bible toten guys and the gals over 50 who are her stalwarts. Otherwise, they fit the profile of the Reagan Dems. It's no donkey in the White House without'em. I live next door to these people.

Posted by: Bruce Lynch | 10 May 2008 02:17:13

Kathleen Sebelius: The first time I ever saw her on TV and listened to her speak at some Democratic function I was impressed. She exudes intelligence and class (Doubles up on Hillary Clinton)The next that I saw her was on CNN in an interview and I remember thinking that this woman could be President some day. She could help solve a lot of future problems for the Democratic Party. A real "can't-miss" lady.

Posted by: Dave Reeves | 10 May 2008 02:21:10

Americans do not vote primarily for candidates with whom they share personal characteristics. If they did, Obama wouldn't be the likely nominee. Nevertheless, there's some tendency to vote along these lines, and I think Obama knows it. He'll pick a white male from the culturally conservative wing of the party.

Posted by: Stan | 10 May 2008 03:15:04

I hope Senator Obama will not not pick wicked Hilary, he won't be able to sleep because she is crazy.

I hope Obama will pick either Webb, Richardson, or Edwards.

Posted by: Dollard | 10 May 2008 03:16:35

Of your top 10, only 4 look reasonable.

-Clinton - Not gonna happen
-Gore - Been There, Done That
-Edwards - I just don't see it.
+Sebulius - I could see this one - get the women's vote without HRC baggage.
+Richardson - Maybe (upside is he's a foreign policy king, downside is he's a walking gaffe machine.)
+Clark - Maybe
-Webb - Like it, but never happen. Can't give up that Virginia Senate seat.
+Casey - Helps in PA and with the Catholic vote overall. Wouldn't rule it out.
-Oprah - I don't think so.
-Biden. Secy of State - yes, VP, No.

Posted by: Ted Link-Oberstar | 10 May 2008 03:29:15

He is probably going to pick Gov. Sebelius. She balances out several places on the ticket all at one time.

And Hillary will never "lower" herself to serve anywhere but at the top of ticket, whether she is qualified or not ("not" is the correct answer there by the way).

Posted by: David | 10 May 2008 03:47:01

HILLARY CLINTON: Yeaaack! Not a chance! However, he has been highly kidsy-glovesy and kissy kissy with her...to an almost fatal extent! Will he make this BIG mistake?

Posted by: andrew frost | 9 May 2008 18:26:01

↑

Andrew,don't panic.

He only put her name to draw your attention. Right,Daniel?

Posted by: f2c | 10 May 2008 03:53:08

Oprah? no he will not do that. he is smart enought and love the mixage. he will prefered a white guy to share the office with. maybe
kathleen sebelius. obama respect this woman very well.

Posted by: Adama | 10 May 2008 06:08:22

KATHLEEN SIBELIUS: They could make sweet music together!

I am hoping to hear more about her and if it is a great thing, she would get my vote as OBAMAs VP!!!

I would love to see a winner with a woman of great character and potential to be his VP! Awesome and a nice thought for 2012 IF Obama plays out an excellent two terms!

Posted by: WJP | 10 May 2008 07:26:34

Barack shows no signs of the mental deficiency which would cause him to shackle himself to Hilary. I can imagine that it might give him a chance of winning the Presidential race, but can you imagine Hilary as Vice-Pres? I heard a speech of hers the other day in which she claimed to be running for the post of 'Chief of all the Americas, North, South and in-betweens'! I know a lady from Columbia who was left incandescent by the speech, and I expect that everyone from Mexico southwards felt much the same way! She would in my view become a complete liability! But what the hell, it is a [North] American problem, I wish the USA luck with it!

Posted by: S. Barraclough | 10 May 2008 08:02:18

What no Bloomberg?

Posted by: John | 10 May 2008 08:07:42

If we can't have Hillary on the ticket - we have no representation. Therefore, we have nothing to lose by staying home.

Posted by: Maria | 10 May 2008 08:20:11

DAFFY DUCK!

Posted by: prudence eely bond mcguire | 10 May 2008 08:53:01

10:1 it's gonna be Richardson. He has immense foreign policy experience, not to mention experience serving in the cabinet under Clinton. He's from New Mexico, so he's got clout in the south, and he could tip the Hispanic vote, a factor that frankly doesn't matter much because the Democrats are never too worried about losing the Hispanic vote in presidential elections. Sebelius is an interesting idea, but rather left-field and she doesn't bring a lot of name recognition.

Posted by: Jamie | 10 May 2008 09:08:57

If he nominates HC as his running mate she will be President within a year; obstacles to her ambition have a habit of being removed.

Posted by: Morvan | 10 May 2008 09:24:03

He has to win first. It's not a given.

Posted by: David Allen | 10 May 2008 10:35:38

Oprah?

I kinda expect the VP to be a politician of some sort. Call me crazy...

Posted by: TDM | 10 May 2008 11:00:12

Ed Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania, former Mayor and District Attorney of Philadelphia, a Clinton backer but not a demagogue about it, and very poipular with the white working class. Would deliver Pennsyvania the way Sen. Casey couldn't, and would appeal across state lines to Ohio. Also a former head of the Democratic National Committee with lots of IOUs out, and very popular with the Democrat rank-and-file.

Posted by: Nick | 10 May 2008 11:59:02

Kathleen Sebelius is my personal choice for Obama's VP. She is a female with executive experience plus the proven ability to win statewide in a red state.

John Edwards could not even deliver his home state when he was on the ticket last time. He showed no real strength in 2008 except for a second-place finish in Iowa. He would not bring enough supprt to the table to merit VP, although a great choice for Attorney General.

46% of the country will not vote for Hillary Clinton no matter what. Her name on the ballot would galvanize Republicans around their guy and send Obama to a certain and crushing defeat. Not a good choice.

Al Gore was already Vice President and would not be interested in being the #2 man again.

Richardson would make a solid choice, but he might make a better National Security Advisor or foreign policy leader or chairman of the civil rights commission.

Clark would make a solid choice. But this election will be a domestic election, an economic election, and the stongest candidate will be a money man who is a proven vote getter and with executive experience. Clark would make a very good VP, but a better Joint Chief of Staff or a fantastic Homeland Security chief.

Webb would actually be the best choice in the group if he didn't have that book scandal. You also don't want to give up the Senate seat because there is no guarantee that another Democrat could win his seat in the next election. But a very good pick, one of the top two or three picks out there.

Casey could not delever his own district for Obama, let alone his whole state. A good choice, but there are far better choices than Casey. A decent choice for Attorney General, however.

Oprah, with no political experience, no constituency, never having held elected office? Probably a worse pick than Hillary - and that's saying something.

Biden would make an OK VP. He would make a better Secretary of State.

Janet Napolitano, Claire McCaskill, Mike Bloomberg, Sam Nunn, Michigan Governor Stabenow(?) would all make good VP fits for Obama.


Posted by: Dave from NY | 10 May 2008 12:55:39

I am an outsider,AFRICAN from SOUTH AFRICA.
I think the following is vital for Obama's VP:-
1)WOMEN
2)WHITE
3)CATHOLIC
4)STATE INFLUENCE
This can only be...K.SEBELIUS not HRC(untrustworthy and bitter)

Posted by: vincent | 10 May 2008 13:53:02

Oprah would do all the right things, but Oprah would not be interested, she like's to do her charitable work in the nation privately to help the poor and vonerable, which she has delivered over the years. Hillary would be the worst choice, Hillary & Bill who thinks they should be the elected choice, would cause problems for the administration and not act in the interest of the country, or the Democratic party, dogs do not give up barking because someone them gave a bone. They may stop for a short time. Hillary reminds me of a story my Grandmother told me as a child, The Crow and the Fox, the crow was in a tree the crow had a bit of cheese in its mouth the fox said to the crow I heard you can sing very nicely, and the fox said to the crow can you sing a song for me, the crow was so flattered, as the crow began to sing, the cheese fell out of the crows mouth, and the fox ran off with the cheese because the fox got what he wanted. A wise man is carefull of who he surounds himself. There are people out there who are interested in American change, and the role that they can play to improve the society and the long term success of a country. Hillary & Bill is interested in themselves first and America second and the Democratic party last.The Democratic Party is the platform from which they use to promote the Clintons Dynasty.

Posted by: Daphne Kenward | 10 May 2008 14:19:33

In response to Philip Walker, yes it is evident from exit polls and the like, that people do tend to vote for a candidate who shares similar characteristics to their own. Articles published every day talk about Clinton having a 25 point lead over Obama amongst white voters and Obama having a massive lead over her from black voters. It may seem like a poor generalisation to make in a world where race/gender should not be considered an issue, but unforunately it is true and candidates will employ tactics to utilise this.

Posted by: Drew | 10 May 2008 14:50:56

please, Lord, anyone but Oprah (and Hillary, of course)

Posted by: sharon from Chicago | 10 May 2008 18:17:57

Al Gore is the man who brought us NAFTA, giving contracts to Halliburton to do things the military always did for itself under his "reinvention of government" program, and, especially,....especially, selection of Joe Lieberman as his VP, the republican in the clothes of a democrat, who no one gave a twit about before. With such bad judgment, dead brain thinking already clearly displayed, why would anyone want him near the control panels again???????

Posted by: dss111 | 10 May 2008 18:30:24

Kathleen, Webb (depending how he voted for the war) or Casey look like the strongest options.

Kathleen I'm particularly fond of because after the VP slot SHE can run for President and we can forget about Hillbillary!

Posted by: Avant Strangel | 10 May 2008 18:56:36

Sam Nunn is the best choice.

Posted by: Craig | 10 May 2008 19:09:38

If he chooses Hillary Clinton as a running mate, he might as well give the Presidency to McCain.

Posted by: | 10 May 2008 19:39:49

Your first three suggestions are very unlikely indeed. Your other suggestions (Oprah aside) are all strong ones. I would also add Evan Bayh, Sam Nunn, Ed Rendell, Ted Strickland, and Chris Dodd to the list--some (though not all) of whom are Clinton allies.

Right now, Bill Richardson and Kathleen Sebelius might be the most likely V.P. candidates, but I would give Richardson the Secretary of State position, and ask either Joe Biden or Kathleen Sebelius to be V.P.

Posted by: Hasslington | 10 May 2008 20:54:24

This article is completely wrong. The only choice: Admiral Jay Fallon.

Posted by: Pete | 10 May 2008 22:18:40

Dear Tony Francis,

Nobody is 'pro-Abortion.' Although people who are against a woman's right to choose often frame support of abortion rights as 'pro-Abortion,' it simply means you do not think abortion should be legal. I do not like tobacco or cigarettes. I do not think they should be illegal. I do not like abortion. It is not my role to tell a woman she can't have one. Get it?

Thanks.

Posted by: Tom | 10 May 2008 22:55:34

Why in the world would Hillary want to be on a ticket for dog catcher with Obama, let alone as vice president. Obama cannot win against McCain. Obams destroys his own credibility by losing. Hillary will run again in 2012 and become the first woman president of the USA. Tough luck, Obama.

Posted by: Jenny Jackson | 10 May 2008 23:55:44

Hillary would be the best choice -- she just spent several months galvanizing Democrats to go out and vote in amazing numbers. (Sibelius would be no substitute, because it's not being female that makes Hillary valuable to so many of us -- it's being herself.)

Once Obama is at the top of the ticket, the media -- which for the most part is pretty liberal (Except for Fox and Limbaugh) -- will stop bashing Hillary for daring to make Obama work for the nomination and go back to bashing Republicans, instead.

Over 15 MILLION people have already voted for Hillary these past few months. And those of us who've followed her career for decades trust that she'll surprise Obama with what a loyal advisor and colleague she'll prove to be.

Posted by: V. J. Homer | 11 May 2008 00:22:21

Hillary is out, Obama would realize with her being just a heartbeat away from the big job, his life wouldn’t be worth a plug nickel come 21 January 2011 (see amendment XXII) – this would enable Hillary – in her mind -- to become only second to Franklin Deficit Roosevelt – in time served in Office. Recall there are many deaths associated with confidants and sycophants of the Clintons.

Oprah is out. Both are from Illinois (see Article II section 1 clause 3 and Amendment XII).

Algore is out – he makes too much money promoting the myth of Global Warming. To take that kind of pay-cut the dental plan would have to be outstanding.

Casey is out – he too is a rookie and doesn’t yet know where all the heads are in the Capitol. Besides Casey is anti-abortion – a violation of Democrat Party core principles.

I doubt any experienced pol would want to hitch their wagon to an unproven rookie star regardless of how messianic he might appear at first blush.

I fear for the future of our Republic; I fear I’m beginning to lose heart. I recently culled quotes from one of America’s foremost curmudgeonly writers of the 1920s & 30s – H. L. Mencken, Things haven’t changed much since he made these observations:

“No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”

“Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers.”

“The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots”

“Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.”

“A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar”

“The aim of public education is not to spread enlightenment at all; it is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed a standard citizenry, to put down dissent and originality”

Posted by: Rok K. | 11 May 2008 00:27:50

A good choice would be U.S. Representative Lloyd Doggett of Texas. Doggett is a white moderate from a crucial state critical in presidential elections. Plus, as a bonus, Doggett looks a bit like a young Abraham Lincoln.

Posted by: Frank J. Garza | 11 May 2008 00:58:28

The only name on this list that makes any sense whatsoever is Casey. He's a conservative white Democrat and would truly balance the ticket. Hillary no, no, and double-no! For starters, look what happened to JFK after he picked Johnson. HRC is Johnson in a pantsuit, only she has a bigger pair and she can't wait to push the Big Red Button to prove it. Plus, Michelle, as I predicted, has emphatically vetoed HRC. The Most Reverend Algore has founded his own religion with 10 times the fervor of the most zealous Scientologist. Any day now, he's gonna start tossing virgins into volcanos. Yuck! Edwards is an empty suit with a hundred-dollar haircut who will not defer to Obama in a thousand years. Biden is smarmy. Richardson is an honorable man, as far as an ex-Clintonite can be called honorable, but you don't need two ethnic minorities on the same ticket. And that goes for a woman VP as well. Webb a loose cannon. Too volatile and vulgar. The oppo will reprint passages from some of his novels and that will be that. Oprah is a billionaire with many business interests. Try asking her to put all that in a blind trust! Yeah, right. Obama will likely pick a conservative white guy with an A rating from the National Rifleman's Association. Take it to the bank.

Posted by: Leon A Davis | 11 May 2008 02:40:29

Bloomberg. Brains and money.
He can help with the huge economic crisis that is just starting. He may even find out how little gold is really left in Fort Knox.

Posted by: KB | 11 May 2008 04:12:22

I am for an Obama/Sebelius ticket. Sebelius has the real experience, and has done great things for her state. When she entered she inherited a debt that she overcame all the while without raising taxes. She is highly regarded. Please check out her wikipedia biography.

Posted by: Jennifer | 11 May 2008 04:59:12

None of the top three are even on your list ! Everyone in DC will be amazed if the VP isn't Tim Kaine. Chris Dodd and Brian Schweitzer are also on top of the list. Murphy would be the favorite of Obama but Murphy may be too young. Yes, it's going to be a Catholic.

Posted by: tom | 11 May 2008 05:00:54

I believe that Barack Obama will not countenance having Hillary as Vice pres. because he wouldn't have the freedom to move. It will be a great day for America, and the World if Obama is the chosen one.
The Clintons have shown throughout this Primaries Campaign that they are divisive, and very ruthless, and neither of them has shied away from alluding to "race" as the underlying consideration for voters.
Set this man free, and turn your backs to all those nasty, yesteryear ideas.

Posted by: johnNO | 11 May 2008 05:06:05

Here is a little something about Kathleen Sebelius.

Recognition

In 2001 Sebelius was named as one of Governing Magazine's Public Officials of the Year while she was serving as Kansas Insurance Commissioner.[24]

In November 2005 Time named Sebelius as one of the five best governors in America, praising her for eliminating a $1.1 billion debt she inherited, ferreting out waste in state government, and strongly supporting public education — all without raising taxes. Also praised was her bipartisan approach to governing, a useful trait in a state where Republicans have usually controlled the Legislature.[25]

In February 2006, the White House Project named Sebelius one of its "8 in '08", a group of eight female politicians who could possibly run and/or be elected president in 2008.[26]

Posted by: Lani | 11 May 2008 05:08:46

Hillary: That ship sailed, finally, with her resorting to racial divisiness. Even voters who wanted a dream ticket (like me) would no longer support it. It would signal for me the selling out of Obama's entire platform of change.

Gov. Richardson: Not a bad choice.. I'd vote for that.

Gov. Janet Napolitano (Arizona)... Just a suggestion.

Did I mention a big HELL-NO to Hillary Clinton??

:)

Posted by: Carolyn P | 11 May 2008 05:57:04

I think Wes Clark , would make a great Vice President to Barack Obama,he has a huge strategic experiance in vast field-areas & is extemely intelligent. He is my tip. Ross Saliba / Melbourne,Australia.

Posted by: Ross Saliba | 11 May 2008 06:03:39

How about William Cohen? He's got the defense and foreign policy experience.

Posted by: ben | 11 May 2008 07:03:28

I think you have used humor in mentioning some of the names, however I think, if I were Obama, I would choose Sam Nunn most probably.

Posted by: John | 11 May 2008 07:10:17

Dont people realize that by making Clinton no 2. you appeal to her supporters at the expense of offending Obama's supporters??

Posted by: sarah | 11 May 2008 07:45:22

First let's eliminate the Oprah joke....he already has Michelle!

Obama needs either the governor of a swing state or someone with a military background.

Gore, Edwards or Clinton are not going to happen - the first two don't really want it, Clinton has ruled herself out with the red phone advert and at the end of the day she's another blue state senator.

Biden is a secretary of state, Wes Clark is a defence secretary, and Bob Casey is a plodder.

The problem with Webb, Bayh and Mark Warner is that the democrats desperately want to hold onto those senate seats.
Kathleen Sebelius - Obama already has a strong Kansas connection, and it's not a swing state anyway.

So you're left with, in my view
- Ted Strickland (Gov Ohio)
- Ed Rendell (Gov Pensylvania)
- Richardson (Gov New Mexico)

Posted by: Simon David | 11 May 2008 07:46:15

Anyone will do !! Take my words!
www.worldleaders2008.homestead.com/

Posted by: Ture Sjolander | 11 May 2008 09:12:59

None of the above, except MAYBE Sibelius.

My pick is the current (D) Governor of Ohio, which is going to be a very critical swing state.

Frankly, even though picking a veep based on electoral demographics is considered important; I think that for this election, it won't be as critical since the dems are going to win by a landslide.

It is the perfect storm. We have the worst president and most unpopular in our history (he's more unpopular than Nixon!!). Formerly safe districts for GOP candidates are now going to Dems. A democrat just won a house seat from what was considered a "safe" district in Louisiana, which has been redder than red for the past two decades.

From a purely strategic reason, there is no point in having Billary on the ticket because my great state of NY is solid blue. She adds nothing to the ticket, and is a lightening rod for the hate machine of the right wing.
Obama dosen't need the Clinton baggage. NOr does he need Bill roaming around the west wing looking for new cute interns.

Posted by: DrBill | 11 May 2008 11:35:34

Sen. Russ Feingold and Sherrod Brown are high on my list.

Posted by: Clem Guttata | 11 May 2008 11:54:33

Oprah? You must be on drugs. Hillary? Forget about it. Sebelius? Quite possible in my view. Claire McCaskill? Uh, why did you leave her off the list? Female senator with executive experience in government from a swing state where Obama has problems. A far better bet than Sebelius, actually.

As for the others . . . check out Simon David's post above. i think he's on to something with those remarks.

Posted by: DBX | 11 May 2008 12:50:03

My pick has always been Condaleeza : she has the experience, she doesn't want to be 'top dog', & what an example if the US could have a trans-party leadership!!

Posted by: Rob | 11 May 2008 13:21:04

I think where Americans needs to go now is to do some soul searching. The next thing is to remember that America is made up of all the people of America. The next thing to think long and hard about what Democracy really means, those who are not cirtain, check the Dictionary, if you do not own a Dictionary ask others who know the meaning. Democracy is not for white people or black people or Hispanics, it is for all the people who live inside that country, regardless of where you came from originally, you live in a Democracy so RACE is a none issue in a Democracy, if it is a true Democracy. Segregation is not a Democracy, that is a Racist State. The Unity of a country is what makes it a strong country, we can look at the factions in the Middle East, and the Divisions. It does nothing to build, but all to break down. people must feel they are a part of the American dream a part of the system a part of the country.America has wasted Billions in Iraq while claiming they are doing it for Democracy, well I do not agree with mass murder under any kind of umbrella. While having a one sided policy leaving out60% of the population in substandard housing and education in their own country, while proclaiming to be the GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD & A SUPER POWER. And does not have any interest in peace and does everything to stir up wars. Oil was the reason for that war. What people nead to do is be careful of who is running your MEDIA. Who Runs FOX NEWS. RUPERT MURDOCK a Jewish guy who has managed to have the whole world fooled, with the Iraq war, the Fox news lies about OBAMA an many more one sided issues with not an ounce of truth to it. And sell the story of the Israeli - Palestinian Propaganda campaign, while those people are living in poverty, and fear and Israelies massacre thousands of innocent women and children every year, it is disgraceful, it is time America gets their News sources from more reliable sources, and stop reading Rupert Murdocks rags, and watching it some one said C-Span is a good source for information.

Posted by: Daphne Kenward | 11 May 2008 14:58:58

Oprah? For starters, if you're going to write a column about American politics, please take a gander at the U.S. Constitution. It prohibits the President and Vice-President from being residents of the same state (in this case, Illinois). Besides, there's a reason you haven't seen her around much, politically speaking. She pissed off a lot of her viewers by endorsing Obama.

Obama's fundamental problem is that if he picks someone with too much experience -- Gore, Biden, and possibly Richardson -- he looks as if he needs adult supervision; if he picks someone with too little experience -- Casey -- the Democrats will look as if they're sending in kids.

Clinton, Casey, Webb and Biden are also bad choices because then the Democratcs offer an all-Senator, a.k.a inside the beltway, ticket.

Clinton? Why would she want it? She'll have much more influence as a Senator than as VP.

Webb's seat may go Republican if he's appointed.

Biden is too gaffe prone.

Clark - forget it. This isn't the time to roll out someone who needs campaign training wheels.

Sebelius will bring a red state with her? News flash! The last time the Democratic nominee for President won Kansas was 1964. Besides, you may have heard that Obama already has a tie to Kansas (his mother's side of the family). He doesn't need two.

Gore? Why would he want the job again?

Edwards has already said he doesn't want to run as VP again; moreover, he was a wet blanket as the nominee in 2004. See Debate, Vice-Presidental, 2004.

Posted by: Chris G | 11 May 2008 15:12:08

So it's Obama ?

Someone had better tell the Clintons.

Posted by: DYLAN RIVIS | 11 May 2008 16:25:28

shweitzer. montana gov, heartland/ agriculture guy. pro NRA

Posted by: lester | 11 May 2008 17:25:01

John Edwards? He couldn't even carry his own home state, he would be useless as a running mate!

Posted by: D Young | 11 May 2008 18:33:42

Dear Tom: Yes, someone is pro-abortion and that is Kathleen Sebelius. The Archbishop in Kansas City has told her to quit coming to communion. Yes she is a good little Catholic girl. Where do you people get off saying Sebelius didn't raise taxes? Of course she did. She even got her buddies on the Supreme Court of Kansas to order a tax increase through judicial fiat - in direct violation of the constitution of Kansas. Then she illegally promised the utilities (behind closed doors) they could raise rates. She guaranteed it. I think all you people who nothing about her are correct: she would be a great running mate for Obama.

Posted by: Tony Francis | 11 May 2008 18:49:28

Barack Obama/ George Clooney '08

you are guaranteed to get uneducated/female white voters.

Posted by: Sam | 11 May 2008 22:19:58

Casey? You've got to be kidding about that helping this guy. You people are really out of touch! Mid-state Pennsylvanians WERE offended by BHO's hateful remarks. Hillary would win the state, but him? Like many in those 'small towns'. Let's just say that I don't want a president who views me, my family, and the millions living around me as "bitter", 'Bible thumping', presumably uneducated, unemployed, etc... Perhaps the candidate needs to review history in terms of his racism - Pennsylvania was the FIRST state to OUTLAW slavery, and that was before the state became the second state to go with the U.S. Constitution.

Posted by: Jennifer | 11 May 2008 23:12:15

Powell or Richardson are amazing choices.

Posted by: Brian Phillips | 12 May 2008 00:00:23

Wesley Clark? The infamously dangerously incompetent General and political wacko appealing to the nation? I don't think so.

Posted by: Crow | 12 May 2008 00:25:42

What about my high school classmate,California congresswoman,Ellen Tauscher.She was on John Kerry's long list in 2004.

Ellen gives Obama street cred-Wall Street cred.She was an investment banker in the 1980's before moving to California and marrying the president of Computerland.

She would help Obama with the older white women-being one herself-and the younger white women-she's written children's books.

Foreign policy?She's one of Bush's most strident critics and has been to Iraq several times.

It's a slam dunk.

Posted by: Tom Dockery | 12 May 2008 00:37:37

Bloomberg? never. We have enough from him here in NYC. The only thing he does is raising the price of everything. Property taxes, Water. And writing parking tickets in the millions. Please, if he will be VP rest assure that he will have a no standing zone sign on every block in the US and giving out tickets. So please don't even mention his name.

Posted by: Micheal | 12 May 2008 03:05:07

If anyone here is stupid enough to believe Sebilius can deliver Kansas in a National general election then I'm accepting all bets. As much as I'd like for her to be gone, Obama needs alot more than her to have a shot.

Posted by: wes | 12 May 2008 03:39:35

With respect to the suppoerts of Obama and after review of Obama's economic plan who in the world he plans to pay for it? I read his plan in detail as well as Clinton's and McCain's and no one has it correct?

"W" has outspent more then any president and both the left and the right are supportive of the sham of an economic stimulas plan.

None of them with expection for those obtain less media coveragage are talking about real issues. Obama yells "Change" yet I have attended four of his rallies and he says the same thing at all of them.

Let's support our founders ideals and return to the law of the land and support an economic plan that makes since.

In closing I will never ever support a health care plan that requires me to withdraw fees from my paycheck nor will I withdraw a single penny from my staff. We must form self study groups and inform the population with the threats of both the left and the right and bring about ideals which are supported by our founders, nothing less and nothing more.

I will not vote for Obam, Clinton nor McCain...


Only Ron Paul.

Posted by: Darel | 12 May 2008 04:39:54

I think Senator Obama should select a very smooth running mate .Hillary has lots of baggage starting from White Water land deal,the death of Vince Foster,White house travel office,the failed medicade issues she championed in her husband's first term.Compoundibg that further is the deep ideological differences between Obama and herself.

Mohamed Kutubu Koroma,
Washington DC.

Posted by: mohamed kutubu koroma | 12 May 2008 04:48:39

Oh please Jim Web? Jim, is actually my senator and aside from outstanding speaches he lacks real action. I contacted his office less then a week to seek his stand on issues of immigration and the planing of the SPP. I was told over and over that he had not yet provided his staff with his positions. A month later I asked the same question...... Eight weeks later no formal plans. Well here it is 5-08 and he has offered no reply to the issue of the spp in regards to his support or opposition. Further, he has been on several national interviews and when asked quesitons of the people his reply is in step with party issues and not the issue of the people.

Jim, was also elected and ran on a main plateform to end the war in Iraq. I know because I heard him say over and over we need to change course and at rallies he was firm to end the war.... Yet, once elected his only real claim to faim is a spat with "W", a staff member of his brought a gun to work and of recent he authored a bill to "Limit" the stay in Iraq.... He did vote to keep funding the war and so it goes on and on and on. 7 of the V.P choices are lock step with the GOP in regards to the war........ And so it goes NO CHANCE FOR CHANGE. Jim was a waste of a vote and so are 9 of the other choices....... I want to see real issues raised and not just the appearance of issues raised.... Dennis was the only won who raised real issues on the left and Paul was the only one to challange the old guard. When will you wake up people?

Posted by: Darel | 12 May 2008 04:51:50

How about Tony.B?

Posted by: Mack, London, England, UK | 12 May 2008 05:43:57

Am I wrong or didn't Wes Clark come close to causing WW 111 In Kosovo!!

Posted by: Edward Synge | 12 May 2008 09:00:52

Ron Paul would bring in the Libertarians, Republicans and everybody who read his bestseller book The Manifesto. I must also mention both Obama and Ron Paul are strict constitutionalists. Senator Obama, Ron Paul is your man.

Posted by: Jason | 12 May 2008 09:24:15

Arnie???

Posted by: Richard Sabin | 12 May 2008 11:12:23

Edwards he sounds nice, but he is not forcefull enough, he lacks the clought, to get things done, I think he was trying to do something with Hillary, could not decide who he would support, he is two faced he will not make a decision. He goes for others decision instead of his own. He is a follower not a leader. which shows weakness, lacks convictions, and will go with anybody, lacks decisiveness not capable of making decisions alone lacks courage.A person who knows what they want goes for it, by gut instinct. I support Obama by gut instint because he is the right man for the job, this time. Hillary may be the best person next time I don't know.It depends on who the candidates are. Obama needs all the support he can get but I am only looking in the gold fish bowl, to see what I can see. The people who came out in his support regardless following their gut instint is the people he should look amongst, he would get more loyal support and better advice and collective good dicision making, and gain better results. In other words who mean well, oppose to people who is in it for what they can get for them selves, is = to disloyalty.

Posted by: Daphne Kenward | 12 May 2008 12:14:12

All those who claim now they are not going out to vote better had. If Hillary was the stronger candidate reality has it she would be winning. Hillary comes with a lot of question marks from past dealing, such as the WAL MART board while women was being discriminated against getting less money for the same Jobs.It made the News Headlines here in the United Kingdom I cant understand how Americans don't know whats going on in their own country, and yet think they live in a DEMOCRACY. It shocks me, under Obama, America will experience true Democracy for the first time. A new begining and a better future, and kill old Politics and bring in the kind of Democracy that includes not excludes the people of America, settind an example to the rest of the world so the people will know the kind of people who deserve to be elected the ones who will set & lead by example. It is a turning point in Americas History be a part of it, and be proud of it.

Posted by: Daphne Kenward | 12 May 2008 12:41:17

All those who claim now they are not going out to vote better had. If Hillary was the stronger candidate reality has it she would be winning. Hillary comes with a lot of question marks from past dealing, such as the WAL MART board while women was being discriminated against getting less money for the same Jobs.It made the News Headlines here in the United Kingdom I cant understand how Americans don't know whats going on in their own country, and yet think they live in a DEMOCRACY. It shocks me, under Obama, America will experience true Democracy for the first time. A new begining and a better future, and kill old Politics and bring in the kind of Democracy that includes not excludes the people of America, setting an example to the rest of the world so the people will know the kind of people who deserve to be elected the ones who will set & lead by example. It is a turning point in Americas History be a part of it, and be proud of it.

Posted by: Daphne Kenward | 12 May 2008 13:00:12

Janet Napolitano, 2 term governor of Arizona, for sure. She'll appeal to pro-Hillary voters; strong on "anti-crime" (she's a former US Attorney); she's "clean" - no scandals ( and no philandering husband, or even ex-husband); and she'll help focus on the fact that John McBush isn't a shoe-in in his home state.

Posted by: Charles Sobieski | 12 May 2008 13:23:48

Posted by: Daphne Kenward | 11 May 2008 14:58:58

Sorry Ms Kenward but your religious bigotry is misplaced as is all religious bigotry.

Rupert Murdoch (please note spelling) is not a 'jewish guy' he is Catholic and was invested as a Grand Officer of Order of St Gregory the Great by Pope John Paul II

Posted by: Jeff Hyman | 12 May 2008 13:41:16

Why would he pick Oprah when Barbra Streisand is available? It makes about as much sense.

Posted by: Howard | 12 May 2008 13:49:45

The WORST choice is Hillary. Clark is not much better...panders too much. Richardson, Sebelius, or Biden...any of the three.

Posted by: C.Myles | 12 May 2008 13:56:23

I think Obama Bloomberg will be the best ticket.

Posted by: Sandy | 12 May 2008 14:09:48

This list is awful, did you put any effort into it at all? Hillary would NEVER accept VP, especially after this long and drawn out primary where she's been trashing Obama since Super Tuesday. And why would he even want to work with her, given that? Come on. Al Gore's already been VP, he's doing what he wants to do now and has a lot more influence and a lot more money. John Edwards didn't endorse Obama because Obama was 'rude' and 'flippant' to him over the phone one time - hardly the way to behave towards your future VP pick.

4 - 7 are actually good, but the rest of the list is complete crap.

Posted by: Dabuek | 12 May 2008 15:04:08

This is the WORST VP list I have seen for Obama. Do you even follow politics? You have the political sense of a rotten banana.

Posted by: Samuelson | 12 May 2008 16:04:27

Few people like Ed Rendall. He is absolutely the worst choice for anything. Stop attempting to put a plug in for him.

Posted by: Yphillips | 12 May 2008 17:46:36

What about Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York. Brings bipartisan image and was a succesful business man so would add on the economy issue.

Posted by: Guy | 12 May 2008 17:58:04

bill richardson is a suckup king...

he obviously would jump ship to Mccain if Mccain was shown to be winning...

and then come up with his very hard to make decision to back maccain instead of obama...just like he did to hillary...

Boo to richardson.

I think if obama doesnt pick the best choice ie. Hillary then he shd consider a split in party votes...hillary may be behind him but that margin is so small if you look at the overall votes...

Again, boo to richardson

Posted by: sue | 12 May 2008 18:26:26

also oprah wants to be the first female president which is why she dissed the rest of the female population and voted for obama.

Posted by: sue | 12 May 2008 18:29:08

US presidential candidates generally try to balance their tickets geographically. Two Midwesterners on the ticket doesn't make sense, which is why the Kansas governor is out, as is Evan Bayh.

A Virginia senator, on the other hand, brings both a Southern and Eastern flavor to the ticket. You couldn't do better unless you had VP from California.

Richardson is out, not only because a "Black-Hispanic" ticket would freak out the white working class, but because he's entirely non-Telegenic. As is Lieberman.

Posted by: CandyKay | 12 May 2008 18:39:38

Yes, to Bill Richardson. We despartely need someone as VP who will bring the trust of the world back in line with the US. This man could do it and has a favorable background.

No, No, No, to Kathleen Sebilius. Her speech put me to sleep. Never heard the name before. She may be good for Kansas, but there is a lot more than balancing the buget, where is she on foreign affairs, SS, Medicare, Medical, Economy and all the other concerns Obama needs help with. She is not the right woman. This is a concern from other women who just may cross the line to McCain. Obama must be very carefull and use some smarts on his choices and really consider the right person for the job. As it is I am ready to cross the line.

Posted by: linaka | 12 May 2008 18:50:28

Just read the Bio on Webb - what a turnoff. Calls himself a redneck, writes pornographic books, and had a silly spat with George Bush in a White House receiving line. That candidacy is DOA - and I should know, I'm one of the voters on the fence between Obama and McCain.

By the way, McCain is supposedly considering Bobby Jindahl, a 36-year-old American whose parents were born in India. He's a Roman Catholic convert and currently governor of Louisiana.

Posted by: CandyKay | 12 May 2008 18:51:38

I think ELIZABETH EDWARDS would be a Great VP and a huge vote-getter as well.

Posted by: iclaudius | 12 May 2008 19:42:51

HRC supporters would be hypocritical at best if they voted for someone from the GOP just because Obama won the nomination. John McCain's views: War with Iran, nixing healthcare reform, keeping Bush's tax cuts are VERY different from what HRC has put out there. To say that you would up and vote for him, if YOUR nominee isn't chosen is just bitter and pointless. If such is the case, maybe these supporters deserve another 8 years of Bush Policy if they will abandon their party at the drop of a dime. On the other hand, HRC as the veep would draw HUGE criticism regarding Obama's message for change and create a gap in credibility that wasn't there before.

Posted by: Tmack | 12 May 2008 21:17:05

For the person who mentioned Gov. Stabenow of Michigan ... she can't run because she was born in Canada.

How about former Maine Senator and Secretary of Defense Bill Cohen?

Brings many of the same qualities Lieberman would bring ... bipartisanship to ticket (a lifelong moderate Republican who served in a Democratic president's cabinet), Jewish, defense credentials.

Posted by: Matt | 12 May 2008 22:02:14

Former Senator Graham of Florida. Never lost a state wide race in Florida. Add senior blue collar appeal to ticket

Posted by: Angelo | 12 May 2008 22:07:40

Geez, what a bunch of gas bags on this blog. He should pick McCain.

Posted by: Swammy | 12 May 2008 22:26:03

SEBELIUS would be the perfect match!! Strong, well-liked Southerner. The Golden Ticket!

Posted by: sank | 12 May 2008 22:57:26

Could anyone feel safe if they knew Wesley Clark was one heartbeat away from The Button?

Posted by: T. J. Cassidy | 12 May 2008 23:33:21

Hey all you people that thinks Gov. Kathleen Sebelius would make a good VP must not be from Kansas! You can have her! I am also a strong Dem. but I will not vote for Obama!!!!I made the mistake voting for her twice but would never again. If Ms. Sebelius is VP & Obama wins maybe her son can take orders OR sell his game "DON'T DROP THE SOAP"as the story goes it is about THE PRISIONERS IN lANSING STATE PRISON.As rummors he was from the Gov. Mansion in Topeka,Kansas.

Posted by: D.Wilson | 13 May 2008 00:28:08

Worst list ever, the only ones with any real shot are HRC, Jim Webb, and Bob Casey. And I personally doubt it will be HRC. What about the Ohio governor? He should be on the list simply because of the importance of Ohio.

Posted by: Logan H | 13 May 2008 01:20:06

The best choice would be Boxer of California. Obama-Boxer 2008!

Posted by: Chuck | 13 May 2008 03:44:08

Why not make it Michelle Obama. She wears the pants in the family anyway. Better yet - make it George Soros; then it would be easier for him, the puppeteer to manipulate the strings, since he could be in the same building.

Posted by: David | 13 May 2008 03:47:33

Doesn't matter who he picks. He isn't going to win.

The white women of this country are much more powerful than anyone is giving them credit for - they will go to McCain. No doubt. No question.

We're not going to "reward" the Democratic party for screwing the faithful women voters.

Can't wait. Election night is going to be even better than the Cheating New England Patriots losing to another Manning.

Go McCain. Osama Obama? Choke.

Posted by: Penni | 13 May 2008 04:29:25

Joe Lieberman. Obama already has young people, but lacks support from the older Americans. Joe fits that bill and appeals to Republicans and Democrats.

Posted by: Roibert Hoenshell | 13 May 2008 07:06:17

It's a good shorthand to automatically ignore anything anyone says who insists on using Obama's middle name or initial. They are always yammering on about something stupid like "bitter" or Wright. They are like children at a schoolyard calling other kids names.

Those of you who do this take a good at yourself in the mirror. Are you truly an adult when you resort to such childish insults?

RE: VP choice. I'm not really sure who I want as VP. I have mixed feelings about Hillary Clinton as VP - I do think she would help bring over her supporters in the short run, but in the long run it may cause more problems. Imagine all of the ads the GOP will run of our VP attacking our President. If Clinton had run a respectable adult campaign she could be VP, but she hasn't so I think Obama must look elsewhere. Tim Kaine could be a good choice - I think Obama has a real shot at Virginia and Kaine would probably put him over the top.

Posted by: Musical Notes | 13 May 2008 07:40:46

I do not know which I enjoy more, the comments or the main article. Am black, Nigerian, lawyer, evangelical and stridently anti-abortion, yet I admire the Democratic party as it mirrors the hope and challenges of America. My gut feeling is Mrs. Clinton's use of the race issue no matter how disstateful are issues that depending on how articulated or perceived especially by white over 40 voters and blue-collar workers will make or mar an Obama candidacy, because it forces all of America to confront whether they really want a black man as their President?

On a selfish note, an Obama Presidency at least gives me the confidence that he may demand more responsible behaviour from leaders in Africa.

Regarding the Bill/Hillary conundrum, the Family has shown an amazing resilience in the face of all previous onslaughts and they have always bounced back. I am sure they are quite capable of reinventing themselves and they appear driven by the need to preserve their legacy so they will retract and make up with the Obama group.

Whichever way it goes, America really is the land of the possible.

Posted by: akintoye akintokun | 13 May 2008 09:33:18

Not sure at all about this list. Does not show great understanding of US politics.

1) No way. There is no sign she wants it, and no sign he would give it to her

2) No way. If he wanted it, Obama would have to seriously consider it, but why would Gore go from saviour of the world to his old job?

3) Again, no indication he wants it, he hasn't endorsed Obama yet, and if he couldn't deliver a single southern state in 04, what makes you think he could do so in 08?

4)Definitely a possibility, though even with her on the ticket, Kansas will almost certainly stay Republican. There is no way she automatically 'brings a red state with her'

5) An African American-Latino ticket would be brave but not sure it will happen. Richardson has had a charisma bypass - did you see any of the debates?

6)Now we're talking. Wes Clark as VP would be a symbolic olive branch to the clinton camp and brings undisputed foreign policy and military gravitas. Plus McCain would have to salute him.

7)Potentially, although he'd leave an open senate seat in virginia which could well go republican. Plus as an attack dog he can be a little out of control...

8)A ticket of two single term senators with no foreign policy experience would be a ludicrous proposition.

9)Oh please.

10)Potentially a good choice, and Mr Foreign Policy. His vote for the iraq war is a blot though. And he won't get Sec State - apparently John Kerry got a promise of that in exchange for his endorsement.

Posted by: Mark | 13 May 2008 10:42:13

Al Gore would not be returning "to Pennsylvania Avenue". He woould be returning to Number One Observatory Circle.

Posted by: Ian | 13 May 2008 14:18:06

So the first three have a zero - yes zero chance of being Obama's Veep; Sibelius has been my pick since before you even heard of her Danny; but she's actually fading in likelihood simply because Obama needs to sort out the hispanic bloc; and that, to me, points to number...oh dear, not even on your list...Janet Napolitano, Governor of Arizona; someone way more popular in that state than McCain (who's only leading by 8 there before the Veep pick).

So, winning back Hispanics; putting Arizona in play; a strong, popular Governor of a border state (major issue in November - immigration), and someone who can significantly help with Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, California and Colorado: sound more plausible than Oprah Winfrey?!

Her or Sibelius, therefore.

Posted by: Peter Coe | 13 May 2008 14:28:04

Regarding Abortion, Women are the ones having abourtions,Does America have a Department of Health & Sexual Education. If people in America have an issue regarding Abourtion, it needs to be looked into. Being pro-life is good but women need prevention not cure. Family Planning. America claims to be a super power so act inside your country by providing Health Education for your citizens, and Free Family Planning, reducing the need for Abortions. Thats how you deal with it. Stop using it as a political tool.

Posted by: Daphne Kenward | 13 May 2008 14:28:35

Three words. Ohio. Ohio. Ohio.
No republican has ever won without that state and Al Gore or Kerry would be president had they won it.
The governor is Ted Strickland. He is popular, a ordained methodist minister, a olive tree to Clinton supporters.

Obama wins Ohio. He is the next president.

Posted by: Kelly Pierce | 13 May 2008 15:11:28

not Bill Richardson, Obama would defitnitely lose a great many Hillary voters for the backstabbing Richardson did on Hillary

Posted by: larry r | 13 May 2008 16:53:13

Dear Mr Obama,
I support Clinton. However, in the near imminence of your nomination and the low probability Clinton would accept vice-Presidency, I would probably vote for McCain-Rice.

But, compared to McCain-Rice, I would vote for an Obama-Sibelius. In fact, I would even vote for an Obama-Obama over McCain-Rice.

Posted by: miamidot | 13 May 2008 17:04:04

I think Kathleen Sebelius would be a good choice except for her recent reprimand and denial of Communion from her bishop.

Posted by: Showme | 13 May 2008 17:12:45

Clinton would have him killed so she could be Pres.

Bad idea ! !

Posted by: Bob | 13 May 2008 17:36:37

Adding General Wesley Clark to the ticket would be very strong, particularly with seniors, veterans, and Americans still uneasy about Obama's lack of executive experience. Clark, like Obama, can also speak in clear, compelling manner about the need for sacrifice, quote the Bible selectively, and win debates.
Evan Bayh would also be a strong choice, but he doesn't really carry even Indiana. Likewise, I appreciate both Richardson and Biden, but wonder if they would really win states for Obama.
Given the unfair winner take all rules for the electoral college, it behooves Democrats to choose a strong candidate with military experience who speaks to folks in rural and suburan America. An Obama/Clark ticket could actually win a majority in the electoral college and go to the White House - not just win the popular vote!

Posted by: Eric | 13 May 2008 18:09:24

Many keep riding B. Clinton about his chasing skirts. So do a lot of senators and rep. who do the same thing. We have too much wind in gov. now without either of the two democrats and I am a democrat.

Posted by: Nate Spear | 13 May 2008 18:32:03

Jennifer of PENNSYLVAINA, YOU ARE angry you are bitter, you have nothing else to do but worry about what one guy said, if it were not true you would not be angry, you would say some people may be angry & bitter but I am not. Or are you one of these mindless retarded people who can't think for them selves, Hillary said Obama ment you small town people like guns and are bitter, they were Hillarys words, not Obama's Hillary said he said that, he never did, she made it up to win your votes, like FOX NEWS TWISTED a STORY to SELL VONERABLE MINDLES CHIMPS who can not think for them selves. This is POLITICS, that is why I call it POLITRICKS, you have to read between the lines, grow up baby he never meant to offend any body.

Posted by: Daphne Kenward | 13 May 2008 21:22:10

What about McCain as vice president? That might shake things up quite nicely.

Posted by: Zoe Robinson | 13 May 2008 22:49:57

Easy to remember: 1) Bill Richardson or 2) John Edwards. EVERYONE knows why!

Posted by: Jennifer | 14 May 2008 02:34:40

Obama/Edwards 2008

Posted by: zzd | 14 May 2008 02:45:18

Obama must have someone with foreign policy experience. You must have other options besides this list. Unfortunataely with Bill Richardson on the ticket, and the problems with illegal immigration, that voters will only look at him as being hispanic and border states are the worst. If he does not make the right decision, then McCain will be the next President.

Posted by: Mim | 14 May 2008 12:34:4