Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT BLOGS Comment Central

Comment Central - Times Online - WBLG

« Monday's comment from the papers in... | All Posts | Remember this? »

December 01, 2008

Labour's own cash-for-questions scandal

Police_removing_items_from_damien_g 

Shortly after the 1997 election was called, the question of the House of Commons cash-for-questions report became one of the biggest issues in the news.

Journalists asked for the Commons report to be made public since it would allow voters to be in full possession of the facts, allowing them to make a judgement on the MPs under investigation.

Tory staff were desperate to allow publication. Why? Because nothing in the report could possibly be as damaging as refusing to publish it.

But we weren't allowed to have our way. Senior ministers informed us that this simply would not be possible, since there was a process to go through. This was a report to the Commons, that would have to be considered by MPs and published by them. And that couldn't happen, because the Commons wasn't sitting.

I recall our frustration. Respect for one traditional view of procedure was being allowed to override political common sense and, as it so happened, the best democratic outcome. We staff reflected that new Labour wouldn't have allowed that to go on. They would have found a way to get the thing out there and end the row.

Peter Mandelson would have done, Alastair Campbell would have done.

We didn't. And the result was a political disaster (for the Conservatives) - the row carried on until election day.

Watching Labour ministers respond to the Green affair, I realise that what had happened to us has now happened to them. Respect for one interpretation of the rules is leading ministers to take a stance that is both politically very damaging to them and doesn't serve the public interest either.

Harriet Harman understands this. She said that while police operational independence must be respected, she is concerned about what happened and wants to protect MPs. The response of other ministers - particularly the Prime Minister, the Home Secretary and Geoff Hoon - has been tone deaf.

It's what happens when you've been in power a long time.

I thought Peter Mandelson and Alastair Campbell were back. Not on this one they weren't.

Posted by Daniel Finkelstein on December 01, 2008 at 11:52 AM in Labour Party | Permalink Bookmark and Share

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451586c69e20105362e5f41970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Labour's own cash-for-questions scandal:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Why would Geoff Hoon, the Transport Secretary have anything to say on the matter? Did you not know there was a reshuffle a few months back?

Posted by: NudeEel | 1 Dec 2008 11:58:48

"Respect for one traditional view of procedure was being allowed to override political common sense and, as it so happened, the best democratic outcome."

Unfortunatly I don't think this has that much to do with the length of time in office. The Tory party regularly will use "process" to avoid getting hands dirty with politics and NuLab have spent years getting away with murder by refusing to accept something until our media wander off to talk about something else. Depressing isn't it?

Posted by: David Sergeant | 1 Dec 2008 14:22:54

I agree that the government's response has been cack-handed. The police's actions have been inappropriate, misguided, wrong and probably unconstitutional.

But, we need to get real. This is a massive Westminster Bubble Story. The hyperbole of from those calling this country a police state, Zimbabwe - other than being deeply offensive to those in Zimbabwe or suffered under communism - just shows how out of touch the political class of this country have become.

30,000 people are potentially losing their jobs at Woollies. Another 500 announced today at HSBC. The public's focus is elsewhere and the political elite would do well to remember this.

Posted by: Alex R | 1 Dec 2008 16:25:42

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

  • Your writers

    Daniel Finkelstein,
    is Chief Leader Writer of The Times and writes a weekly column. Comment Central is his rolling guide to the best opinion on the web.
    Hattie Garlick, the Online Comment Editor, will also be posting.

    Send us an email

    Click here for more information on the blog.

    Latest posts

    Latest comments

    Categories

    Select from the dropdown

You might also like...

  • 2008 Presidential election
  • Cassilis
  • Justin Webb's America
  • Boulton and Co.
  • Benedict Brogan
  • Dizzy Thinks
  • Chris Dillow
  • The Fink Tank
  • Daniel's Weekly Column
  • Oliver Kamm
  • Stephen Pollard
  • Iain Dale
  • Nick Robinson
  • Guido Fawkes
  • Conservative Home
  • Clive Davis
  • Arts & Letters Daily
  • Real Clear Politics
  • Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish
  • Marbury
  • Mickey Klaus
  • Political Betting
  • Times Online Weblogs
  • Times Comment

News from
Times Online

  • UK
  • Crime
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Political
  • Science
  • World
  • Iraq
  • US
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Asia
  • Africa
  • Technology
  • Business
  • US Elections
Other Times Online blogs
  • Crime Central
  • Faith Central
  • Urban Dirt
  • Alpha Mummy
  • BabyBarista
  • Ariel Leve
  • Charles Bremner
  • Inside Iraq
  • Irwin Stelzer
  • Mary Beard (TLS)
  • Money Central
  • News
  • Sports Commentary
  • Peter Stothard (TLS)
  • Richard Lloyd Parry
  • Ruth Gledhill
  • Tech Central
  • The Game

Feeds

Get the latest news and comments via RSS

Use the buttons below to add the feeds to your RSS reader, or right the links above, click and choose "save target as", then paste the url into your RSS reader.

For more information on using RSS, and for more feeds from Times Online, visit

the main RSS page

Bloglines
Google
Yahoo!
Netvibes

For older posts, visit the archive

  • 2006
  • 2007
  • Jan 2008
  • Feb 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009