Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT Blogs

Green Central - Times Online - WBLG

Subscribe to a feed of the blog at: http://timesonline.typepad.com/environment/rss.xml

« How to build a green economy | All Posts | BP goes back to its roots as a big, dirty oil major »

April 17, 2008

Is it really right to ship rubbish to China?

Container_ship On Newsnight last night, the government minister Joan Ruddock defended the practice of sending plastic rubbish to China because, she said, it saved the boats from sailing empty when they return from delivering us all the stuff China has manufactured on our behalf.

It was a telling remark.

Jeremy Paxman had asked her why more plastic was not recycled here in the UK. Her response showed clearly that even the Labour government believes that globalisation is some kind of inevitable, natural process, much like the passing of the seasons, or the succession of night and day, rather than a political choice, just one out of many.

A less polluting alternative would be to make ourselves more self-sufficient in this country by building recycling facilities here and actually manufacturing things with the (re)new(ed material. This would create jobs and put an end to those vast and polluting shipping trips.

But what about the poor Chinese? Whatever will they do without that trade, which brings them so much benefit?

We too benefit from international trade, in much the same way (which is to say, not a great deal). We import and export, with a variety of trading partners - at a great cost in carbon emissions - and count this a benefit because it increases GDP. There seems to me to be no good reason why we couldn't simply consume what we produce, instead, and accept lower GDP.

In case you missed it last time, permit me to retell my favourite new joke, about two economists who challenge each other to eat a pile of dog poo for £20,000 a go. (At a time of global food shortage, the joke has particular resonance, I like to think.)

Having done both - eaten sh*t and rendered themselves precisely no better off than before - they pat each other on the back and congratulate themselves. Why? Because they've increased GDP. I commend the joke to Joan Ruddock, and hope it helps to modify her views on international trade.

Posted by John-Paul Flintoff on April 17, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0) | Email this post

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/297284/28198948

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is it really right to ship rubbish to China?:

Comments

The chinese are more intelligent than us they are turning the plastic into lots of products then selling it back to us as cheap chinese rubbish that you see in poundland and poundstretcher shops,so in fact we are paying them to take our rubbish then buying it back at inflated prices.

Posted by: carl clark | 19 Apr 2008 09:41:42

Post a comment

    • Hannah Strange

      Hannah Strange is environment editor for Times Online.

      John-Paul Flintoff

      John-Paul Flintoff writes for The Sunday Times, having previously worked for the Financial Times. Since first writing about climate change and peak oil in 2005 he has devoted much energy to reporting on the environment. He has a young daughter, and hopes the climate, and civilisation, won't fall apart before she's grown up.

      Robin Pagnamenta

      Robin Pagnamenta is The Times' energy and environment editor and has also written for the New Statesman, Time Out and the Miami Herald. He welcomes comments from readers.

      Lewis Smith

      Lewis Smith is environment reporter for The Times. His main areas of interest are climate change, conservation and animal behaviour.

      RSS Feeds

    • Green Central
    • Environment News
    • Latest Posts

      Environment News

      More from Times Online...

    • The environment page - news and comment
    • Green living
    • The carbon diet
    • Q&As on environmental issues
    • Green travel
    • Eco homes
    • You might also like...

    • Climate Debate Daily
    • Digg/environment
    • Eco Facism
    • Greenpeace
    • Gristmill
    • New Scientist
    • Self-sufficientish
    • Treehugger
    • Veosearch
    • WWF