Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT Blogs

Green Central - Times Online - WBLG

Subscribe to a feed of the blog at: http://timesonline.typepad.com/environment/rss.xml

« Watch video of Chile's "dormant" volcano erupting | All Posts | Time to compost your wee and your poo »

May 12, 2008

Evolution of waving in flowers equivalent to women suggestively wiggling hips

Flowers blowing from side to side in the wind are the plant equivalent of women wiggling their hips suggestively at men, reasearchers have found.
Observations of sea campion have shown that flowers which wave at passing insects have a better chance of getting pollinated than those which stay still.
The flower's 'wobble' makes them more attractive to pollinators and explains why many plants risk growing long stalks which can get damaged when the wind blows.
Colour, smell and bribery through the production of nectar have all been recognised as lures for insects but scientists have only just woken up to the wobble.
The role the length of stalk grown for the flower was previously thought to be important just in the dispersal of seeds but is now realised to be crucial to pollination levels.
Dr John Warren, of Aberystwyth University, compared evolution of waving in flowers to women suggestively wiggling their hips.
Flowers that waved in the breeze were found to be more successful at producing seed than those with the short stalks, the study of sea campion, Silene martima, showed.
But there was an optimum length for the species because those that grew the longest proved "too wobbly" for insects to keep hold of.
Dr Warren said there was another trade-off between the thickness of the stalk. Thin stalks meant the flowers could wave more effectively at the insects and attracted more of them but thick stalks gave the creatures a more secure landing platform.
"Flowers that don't move much are less attractive to insects than those that wobble," he said. "It's an element of insect attraction that we've overlooked.
"There's an optimum waviness. The insects have to be able to stay on the flowers long enough to successfully pollinate the plants."
He added: "There is a downside to waving to attract so many insects in that it increases the chances of the plants getting sexually transmitted diseases."
Observations of sea campion on the beaches of Aberystwyth showed that flowers needed insects to be on them for at least a minute for successful levels of pollination.
An accumulative total of two minutes or more was found to be the ideal minimum and resulted in the greatest quantity of seeds being produced.
"Although the importance of flower stalk in dispersing seeds has long been known the results presented here strongly suggest that its adaptive significance as a mechanism for attracting pollinating insects by facilitating floral-waving has been overlooked," the researchers said in their report, published in the journal Evolutionary Biology.
"Mobile flowers are visited more frequently and by more species than are the stable flowers. Although average visit durations were less in mobile flowers this was more than compensated for by the increase number of visits."
Dr Warren started the research project after observing sea campion floweres waving in the wind while lying on a beach at Aberystwyth.
"I was lying on the beach at my daughter's birthday party watching the flowers blowing in the wind. They were blowing violently and I wondered why they bothered to have stalks," he said.

Posted by Lewis Smith on May 12, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0) | Email this post

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/297284/28993870

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Evolution of waving in flowers equivalent to women suggestively wiggling hips:

Comments

or maybe the insects just didnt recognise the abnormally immobilised flowers and Doc has a fertile imagination.

Posted by: Steve Bush | 16 May 2008 14:25:17

Post a comment

    • Hannah Strange

      Hannah Strange is environment editor for Times Online.

      John-Paul Flintoff

      John-Paul Flintoff writes for The Sunday Times, having previously worked for the Financial Times. Since first writing about climate change and peak oil in 2005 he has devoted much energy to reporting on the environment. He has a young daughter, and hopes the climate, and civilisation, won't fall apart before she's grown up.

      Robin Pagnamenta

      Robin Pagnamenta is The Times' energy and environment editor and has also written for the New Statesman, Time Out and the Miami Herald. He welcomes comments from readers.

      Lewis Smith

      Lewis Smith is environment reporter for The Times. His main areas of interest are climate change, conservation and animal behaviour.

      RSS Feeds

    • Green Central
    • Environment News
    • Latest Posts

      Environment News

      More from Times Online...

    • The environment page - news and comment
    • Green living
    • The carbon diet
    • Q&As on environmental issues
    • Green travel
    • Eco homes
    • You might also like...

    • Climate Debate Daily
    • Digg/environment
    • Eco Facism
    • Greenpeace
    • Gristmill
    • New Scientist
    • Self-sufficientish
    • Treehugger
    • Veosearch
    • WWF