Nazir Ali no-go backlash
Predictably, though without any visible authority, some Muslim leaders are calling for Bishop Nazir Ali to resign after his remarks about "no go areas" colonized by Islam in Britain. Equally predictably, the Daily Mail has found the Chairman of the Muslim Forum to write in support. Meanwhile Archbishop Cranmer's blog reports that a British blogger called "Lionheart" (modelling himself on the Crusader king, no doubt)
is theatened with arrest for objecting to British Islam, and doughtily says
"Even if Lionheart is a deluded idiot, political extremist or a raving lunatic, it is concerning that he should be threatened with arrest for his writings. In an important judgement on a case dealing with religious freedom of speech in the High Court on 23rd July 1999, Lord Justice Sedley quoted Socrates and two famous Quakers when he declared: "The irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and provocative have a right to be heard."
The cross Blogistan sticks in its tuppenceworth too - but does make the generally lacking point that the Bish has not actually named any no-go areas, and that nobody so far has found one. Startling, though, is the claim that Nazir-Ali is "biting the hand that feeds him...if it were not for multiculturalism, the idea of an Asian bishop of a southern English bishopric, let alone a Black archbishop of York - the second highest-ranking clergyman in the whole church - would be unthinkable" What? Race, surely, is not equivalent to culture?


Recent Comments