The Apprentice: week 1
I have never met Sir Alan or any of his apprentices. Indeed, I've never had much of a desire to watch The Apprentice; I love an ambitious hero as much as the next Macbeth fan but reality show shoutiness is as irritating as nylon knickers. Surely if these people were truly enterprising they'd go and start their own businesses rather than strutting around in front of the cameras boasting about their business ability.
Anyway, I now have a professional interest in the show (ie my boss asked me to watch it), so I am sitting here on Wednesday night with my laptop and only the occasional wistful glance at the football scores so that you can enjoy my real-time review. Or you could just add your own reasons for wanting to slap every single person associated with the show to the comments section. It's up to you.
1. What's with Sir Alan's weird intonations? How can he emphasise that many words in any one sentence?
2. My first smile of the day: the girls (why aren't they women? sheesh) upsetting a couple of people, one of whom is in a wheelchair. Nice PR for your team, ladies. Or Alpha or whatever you called yourselves. Also impressed that you were trying to sell fish by asking people what they usually paid for it. Naturally there are enough canny customers that they're selling below wholesale price.
3. For a second I thought the boys (men) were going to do much better on the prices than the chicks - what with doing a bit of research rather than inviting offers - but then they managed to price their lobsters at £4.90 and entirely renewed my faith in cynicism. This was also helped by the man with the sticky-up hair starting sentences with the phrase "as the team leader I want to say..."
4. 22 minutes in and we have individuals beginning to make excuses about why everything's going a bit wobbly with the margins. Ooh, and the chaps are actually starting to refer to each other as individuals. As in "some individuals are being really sh*t but I have to deal with this because I am the team leader" (not an exact quote, although I can of course confirm that he is the team leader).
5. Fabulous negotiation by the solicitors buying the leftover fish. Didn't give an inch. if I ever get divorced I'm hiring them. Even if they're tax lawyers.
6. I suppose that the rift in the men's team about hair-boy's leadership and/or who has had a proper education is meant to add excitement and tension but it's all so obviously set up to make good telly that it's just irritating. It's the BBC equivalent of sticking someone with Tourette's into the Big Brother house.
7. Now Sir Alan will do some more talking.
8. At first I thought the over-hyping music was the most annoying thing about the going into the boardroom bit.Then all the men started talking their way through the utterly meaningless post-failure blamestorm. Where a business decision matters, finding out why it worked (or didn't) also matters. But this is just telly - no one is losing anything real. It's not their money, their livelihood; they've risked nothing more than embarrassment.
9. Score one in the positive column: Big Al just told one of the boys off for talking in business cliches instead of giving actual answers. More people should follow that advice.
My final impression? I really enjoy talking to businesspeople and entrepreneurs. I am genuinely interested in finding out about what goes on behind the scenes in real companies. But this doesn't feel real.
(Picture of Nicholas De Lacy Brown from BBC The Apprentice website)


Good analysis. On the whole, I was unimpressed. Both teams look very weak and there is a lack of candidates coming to the fore to manage. It _looks_ like there are a couple but they're absent when it comes down to putting themselves forward. Prime example? Raef.
My thoughts - http://www.matthew-jones.net/?p=28
Posted by: Matt Jones | 27 Mar 2008 00:57:33
It'll take a couple of weeks to get going - and it is a TV programme - so some of them will be edited to make them villains!
Still it's the best thing on the TV - the footy was dreadful - roll on the shopping channel selling experience - the best episode on just about every series so far!
Posted by: Yorkielass | 27 Mar 2008 12:16:06
I was funny to see the barrister get fired.
It's a common misconception that the more MBAs, PHDs etc you have, the more 'successful' you will be. It's guts resilence and picking yourself up after being knocked down that defines a persons character.
I hope that chap learnt it!
Posted by: Andrew | 27 Mar 2008 13:13:15
I am so glad that the barrister got fired. He was so arrogant, considering a B gcse a failure. The apprentice is a good show, and of course they are going to edit things to make it more entertaining: that's television.
Posted by: John | 27 Mar 2008 14:03:29
Being an educated person (I'm well into Art (capitalised!) and Culture (ditto) me), I didn't watch the programme. In fact, so aloof am I, that I see my distain of football as a sign of my intellectual superiority.
And I still wear 80's 'Aviator' style shades as a sign of how annoying I am.
Posted by: Stephen Tucker | 27 Mar 2008 14:31:55
Comment by S Tucker
"I see my distain of football as a sign of my intellectual superiority."
The word is DISDAIN - or was this a joke?!
PERHAPS he NEEDS english grammar TUITION from SIR ALAN (who I have met and for whom I did work for (sic) (emphases deleted))
Posted by: Paul Reichel | 27 Mar 2008 15:24:49
The first series was as informative as it was interesting, shinning a light on how to get ahead. Then the BBC saw it as their ‘Big Brother’ a popular reality show, and ego stroking trip for the totally dumb. What we have now is a waste of space.
The program now is not about finding the next Alan Sugar it’s about highlighting to the greater community the type of people that should never be offered a job carrying any responsibility.
The original US version still retains some of the original ethos.
Posted by: Ian Bryan | 27 Mar 2008 16:06:18
Actually Alan Sugar is a real pratt.
Anyone going through this charade must
need their bumps feeling.
If anyone sees the American version they will see how Sugar apes Donald Trump. If this is good TV then I will go back and try and plait sawdust.
Posted by: Ray Bowers | 27 Mar 2008 16:51:18
Oh boy! The candidate selectors have excelled this time in choosing unabashed, driven stereotypes. On previous series I've needed a couple of episodes to decide who to detest. This time, they're all instantly, totally detestable. Unmissable.
Posted by: Jonathan Sims | 27 Mar 2008 17:02:22
This show confirms my belief that we are inundated with intellectual idiots, who despise the non-undergraduate. If this selection of apprentices are to make decisions for our future, replace with the fishmonger type who know about the real world. The current undergraduate is, in my opinion, less educated than the sixth former in my day.
Posted by: T.J.H | 27 Mar 2008 18:00:48
I would pay £100,000 for months of prime time exposure. No doubt Sir Al will be choosing tasks which give exposure to any company who is in bed with Sir Al, or indeed, perhaps we will see more of Sir Al's own businesses on the show. (like the home where the chaps and chapesses are staying - no doubt part of Sir Al's property empire). I drew inspiration from the 1st series. This series however, just draws me nearer to alternative evening viewing activities.
Posted by: John Tansley | 27 Mar 2008 18:38:59
They havent a clue about retail. The most basic things in selling are know your product and know your price. They are all blah and no substance...read more on my blog at www.myspace.com/fionaellis
Posted by: Fiona Ellis | 27 Mar 2008 19:01:59
Here we go again ..a number of want to bes in a downward spiral in terms of dignity. Big jobs, big qualifications but little common sense.
Sir Alan with his eyes and ears looks like he knows that the quietest candidate will win whilst the others follow like lemmings over the cliff to either obscurity or fame..
The question to ask from these new aspiring sugar cubes is to hype or not to hype that is the question?
Posted by: Ash Punj | 27 Mar 2008 20:24:00
I just love it! Of course it is beautifully edited in order to show a particular contestant as "brilliant" one week and "a nincompoop" the next....as soon as they make those swoopingly stupid egotistical statements to camera, we all just KNOW they will trip themselves up superbly with it, very shortly. The camera man must have to take hours of film, just to get 10 seconds of amazing scowl/lecturous grin/dismissive shrug etc. So just sit back and enjoy - and remember, it IS t.v. and not 'real life'.
Posted by: Lesley Warner | 27 Mar 2008 23:36:46
I would employ none of them.
Could it be that the type of person who attracts high ratings is not a good fit with one who succeeds in business; Sir Alan excepted, of course!
Posted by: John Terris | 28 Mar 2008 08:16:52
The shambolic performance of this unpleasant bunch of incompetents is further proof of the failure of the New Labour education project. Self-belief is fine, but these people are bordering on the self-delusional - "best salesperson in Europe"?? - having continually been told they are wonderful and been showered with academic qualifications obtained by taking exams which have got easier every year. Never mind, make a note of their names, some of them will probably make it into the Cabinet one day!
Posted by: Tony Miles | 28 Mar 2008 10:06:02
Approach this show thinking you will be watching a careful selection process for a highly paid business position at a major company, and you`ll be disappointed.
Approach it as a marginally more upmarket version of Big Brother and you`ll be closer to the mark.
Sitting at home complaining that it doesnt come close to assessing the business accumen or leadership skills required for a decent job in management, is akin to wondering why the Teletubbies arent tackling the crisis in the Middle East... totally deluded and irrelevent.
Dress it up with as many flowery "serious" epithets as you like... simple fact is, The Apprentice is a gameshow.
Once you have grasped this , and cast aside your hope of gaining a little insight in "how to become a successful millionaire" , you can relax and enjoy the humour (intentional or unintentional) of watching a motley crew of the terminally deluded panto heroes and villains.
Cheer lustily at the success of the hardworking stoical candidates, and boo and hiss at the panto villains.
I loved the first episode..it was pure stereotype pythonesque theatre.
featuring old favourites such as a number of "upper class twit of the year" runners.. "oop north..reet gooduns"... and even a couple of Fred Gumby`s in there.
Stop trying to analyse it like it`s something it patently isnt and never would be....
It is the cheapest 12 hour long TV advert in history, considering the cost of a 30 second slot in Friday`s Coronation street, I reckon 100k for 12 hours solid airtime on the beeb is one of Alan Sugar`s wiser business moves.
i cant wait for next week!
Posted by: Phil J Noonan | 28 Mar 2008 11:35:14
As far as I am aware Sugar has not had a creative idea in his life other than copying other company's products more cheaply, but I stand to be corrected? His personal manner is that of a dinosaur from another age and unsuited to encourage young potential business leaders. No doubt it was chosen by tongue in cheek TV program producers to raise controversy by showing business people as money grabbing hicks without a semblance of taste or style or humour.
Posted by: john bentley | 28 Mar 2008 12:00:08
I thought House's (Ch 5 Thursday) auditioning of "apprentices" for his new sidekicks was far more interesting, especially his mickey take attitude as he said "you're fired", and the guy who was No6 came back in with his number upside down as No 9 and House let him stay for showing initiative!
Posted by: John Webster | 28 Mar 2008 12:12:47
Many of the so called Apprentices look as though they are just out of
school and they all claim to have done this and that. However if they were so successful in their own jobs why are did they apply to the
join the series? Could it just be a case of I want to be a famous media star? Frankly they deserve all the ridicule they will undoubtably get.
Posted by: Marc Piacentini | 28 Mar 2008 12:38:15
So, the Barrister that got fired on The Apprentice? Would you ever let him fight your corner in court? Telling Sir Alan the rift in the group was between the 'gritty' sales boys and the intellects (I failed my gcse and got a B)? Did he do NO research at all into Sir Alan's business career history? Amazing!
Posted by: gill | 28 Mar 2008 12:40:33
What a brilliant start to the series, seemed to descend into a class war immediately.
Posted by: Joanna Swatland | 28 Mar 2008 19:23:37
Can't wait to see the episode when both teams are given the task to open Heathrow T5 !
when is it being televised ?
Posted by: Andy Bush | 28 Mar 2008 19:54:22
It was that horrid little bit of unshaven chin that got him fired never mind anything else!
Posted by: F Smith | 28 Mar 2008 20:16:54
I have a first class honours degree in physics and a PH D gained in the days when not everyone went to University and agree that qualifications very rarely translate into business acumen. My advice to the Apprentices is concentrate on what you have been trained for; thats what I did and I have enjoyed every moment of my career. Leave the barrow boy selling to others.
Posted by: john | 28 Mar 2008 20:27:11
Is it me but where on earth do they find such vacuous contestants. I see young graduates types all the time and they are much sharper socially aware and streetwise than the folk on the programme. There is no one there you would employ to do anything intellectually demanding or requiring social sensitivity.
Posted by: Merlin | 29 Mar 2008 09:45:20
Great show. The telling point was when (I think) Nick Hewitt noted that the girls pitch normally outsold where the boys pitched 5:1. So really it came down, as always, to taking immediate action!
Posted by: jim | 29 Mar 2008 22:07:44
Yes, I agree the candidates are prats but the biggest prat is Sir Alan. Why does he make himself look such a tosspot week after week ? Why do we watch ? Answers 1. Don't know 2. There's nothing else on the box on a Wednesday at 9.00pm
Posted by: Nicholas Murphy | 30 Mar 2008 06:12:32
Wonderful. Congratulations to the producers of this fine cringe-making reality programme. They have found a great bunch of pompous, arrogant youngsters for the rest of us to laugh at. I take it that the BBC are paying their first year's salary, because I cannot believe Sir Alan Sugar would employ any of them.
Posted by: John McCammont | 30 Mar 2008 15:29:06
Watched Saturday Night's repeat on BBC 2. It was grrrr8. 20,000 applications to have 15 minutes of fame, even if it is as "a major league ass-hole" to quote George W.
I can actually remember the "barister's" first names - Nicolas de la something.
The Apprentice is brilliant television - but that is what it is: television. It is to entertain - like Top Gear. Yes, I agree that Donald Trump's show makes BBC's efforts look amateurish, but it is the best thing on TV at the moment.
Posted by: Stephen Holmes | 30 Mar 2008 16:40:28
I was glad they raised the point that it's not just education that counts - you can have all the education in the world and still be a half wit.
i think it's going to follow the trend of previous years that the boys fail at the start and then fight back from the bink of disaster. it is telivison afterall.
Posted by: Chris | 30 Mar 2008 21:04:18
looks like it's going to follow the same formula as normal - the blokes go from defeat to defeat and it's only in the mixed teams do the blokes start a come back.
it is television after all!
Posted by: Chris | 30 Mar 2008 21:08:46
I think they have spoiled the format from the 1st series.The program makers seem more interested in showing all the backstabbing in the boardroom rather than showing how the candidates tried to win the task. Sir Alan seems to play up to the camera now with his comments to the team members aswell.
Posted by: Andrew Elliott | 30 Mar 2008 22:00:07
The an idea was good, but now it became money making machine for BBC. I hope kids already in bed, because it is not how you make the business.
Posted by: Elena Holmes | 31 Mar 2008 01:34:10
Good TV, but such a dire lack of common sense. How can any of them expect to lead people in the future if they can't even understand the basics of how you identify and price things to ensure you make a margin. Yes - have a sale of left-overs in the last half hour, but at least sell most of the stock at the correct price!
Posted by: Geoff Homewood | 31 Mar 2008 07:49:01
I dipped in and out of the first couple of series, but the cynicism last year's put me off for good. To say "I don't want salesmen, I don't like salesmen" in an interview printed in The Times, then to have contestants drawn predominantly from sales & marketing and to give them nothing but sales tasks - well, as far as I'm concerned, that sucks. It has as little to do with entertainment as it does with business.
Posted by: Ian Kemmish | 31 Mar 2008 08:46:29
A buzz of excitment, the Apprentice is back on. Excitment lasted for the first 15 mins.
Oh dear, is it really that difficult to follow a book showing names and prices of fish to sell.
Does a degree in common sense exist?
Another bunch of arrogant individuals who clearly have issues.
Not the sort of people I would want to head up any company I work in.
Posted by: Jeanette Evans | 31 Mar 2008 09:02:55
Re: Candidate Selection
Once again there appears to be too many candidates that seemed to have made it already in terms of their chosen career. For example, what is someone doing on the show who has already passed his Bar exams!!! Really . . . let's give those who have not been able to follow their chosen career due to personal circumstances a second chance. Introduce this element in to the selection criteria and you will double your following of viewers.
Posted by: Sandra Power | 31 Mar 2008 09:25:40
I find the BBC production values very irritating, so much repetition. Try recording Apprentice, Masterchef, Dragons etc and see how much stuff you fast forward through.
Posted by: John Ledbury | 31 Mar 2008 09:50:33
I think The Apprentice is a wonderful programme - all pride and prejudice.
It is a terrific global marketing strategy for Sir Alan Sugar; albeit funded by TV licence payers.
Nick and Margaret are the individuals the candidates should be emulating - but they don't seem to have noticed that (mainly because they are so full of their own self-importance).
I think Nick and Margaret are wonderful characters and would like to see more of them, but less is perhaps more in this case.
They are fascinating and come across as very valuable assets in Sir Alan's business.
Great viewing. I'm hooked.
Posted by: Annie | 31 Mar 2008 09:53:05
One of the best shows on tv alongside dragons' den. It really illustrates how unimportant top qualifications are for those who are determined to succeed. Sir Allan should fire the lot of them and hire the solicitor/hustler who bought the last box of fish off the boys team for fifty quid! He was deadly sharp!
Posted by: Christopher Icha | 31 Mar 2008 10:59:31
I wouldn't have employed any of that lot in my business to make the tea.
Posted by: george.harvey | 31 Mar 2008 11:21:19
Thank you thank you thank you for giving me the pleasure of seeing 16 of the most truly awful people I've ever seen being ritually humiliated by the Sugar firing squad over the next few months. I have my leaguetable all ready and I'm eagerly waiting to see my next target get what they deserve soon (the greatest salesperson in Europe hopefully). Life is good sometimes !
Posted by: Alistair McGregor | 31 Mar 2008 12:50:51
As most of the past contestants have gone into media jobs after their stint on the program, they are Big Brother wannabees in suits. The poor idiot who actually wins it will have to work for a living.
Posted by: Alex | 31 Mar 2008 12:51:36
This years apprentice, i feel it will produce good t.v but maybe not quite the good business man or woman sir alan is looking for. Many of this years contenders seem to be spoilt brat, university students who'd rather consult each other for days about a challenge before getting anything done. It also seems these jumped up public school children are first to shoulder the blame on to someone else when they've cocked up themselves. However, there seem a few down to earth, hardworking candidates who sir alan may be able to shape into his next apprentice.
Posted by: Mitch Dennis | 31 Mar 2008 12:52:24
I know that they are supposed to be apprentice material but they do seem to be lacking any sort of worldly skill for the jobs that they apparently have now.
I would like to see a selection run off between potential apprentices and some more experienced individuals. I believe it would be a challenge for both by the way but in different ways. Ditch all the other team building exercises with the two oil drums and 3 pieces of wood !
Posted by: Ian | 31 Mar 2008 13:59:21
Awful television show with the vilest money hungry souless scumbags. Somebody at BBC should tell them, they're fired! Bring back decent well written evening entertainment please.
Posted by: Average Joe | 31 Mar 2008 14:11:25
The Apprentice has now lost all credibility by insulting the the viewers intelligence. The candidates are an unemployable shower of fast talking nincompoops
who you would not employ to wash your car. God help us if this is the state of things to come. None of them could sell a rope to a drowning man if they were stood at the side of the river. MG
Posted by: Mike Ganley | 31 Mar 2008 14:28:33
I was bored with this after Series 1 and can't understand why people are still watching.
Posted by: Gilly | 31 Mar 2008 14:40:31
Maybe their bosses set it for them as homework too.
Posted by: Carly Chynoweth | 31 Mar 2008 15:12:20
I cannot quite believe that so many people would take this programme so seriously. It is, as many others have said, a television programme. It is not meant to be "How to succeed in business, without really trying". I own up to the fact that I watch it just for the pleasure of seeing who can make the biggest fool of themselves in the shortest possible time. Anybody who willingly puts themself into such a situation deserves everything they get. Have none of them ever bothered to watch previous series and perhaps LEARN (my emphasis) from them? Think not.
Posted by: Brian Price | 31 Mar 2008 15:13:22
Some people on here really are missing the point, this is tv entertainment pure and simple. Those seeking a treatise on business management and tips on how to make their first million should look elsewhere. Those seeking an intelligent version of the big brother set up keep on watching. For me this is great entertainment and is an example of a well produced tightly edited and is actually quite fun. Hope it runs for a couple of more series
Posted by: kris | 31 Mar 2008 18:14:34
An expose of the worst traits of salespeople.
Little experience of any value, no skills, "nothing to bring to the table".
it would be more entertaining to score them on buzzwords.
Posted by: nick | 31 Mar 2008 18:24:33
As always programme makers cannot resist the temptation to "improve" upon the so called reality of these shows. The mission statements of the competitors are now clearly 'sexed' up by the producer, or their assistant, just as was done in Blind Date. Do they not realise that the dead hand of such improvements only diminishes credibility, and the artificial tidying up of the characters merely makes them cartoon like heroes and villains? Just another step in the simplification and dumbing down of what passes for television these days.
Posted by: Simon Peters | 1 Apr 2008 14:25:59
I've got to say what a useless bunch of pillocks! 1. Why bother to go down the market at all? Sit in a cafe all morning discussing what to call ourselves etc - useless.
Why didn't someone get on the blower to the nearest fish retailer and sell it to them first thing as a job lot? £1200 starting price bang, you've won. And you can go have a drink for the rest of the day.
Posted by: Stuart Booth | 2 Apr 2008 16:13:39