Did the better side prevail in Pretoria?
Frank Praverman
The injustice. The cruelty. The pain.
The Lions are licking their wounds this morning, knowing that the series is over. Five heroes lay in hospital and the rest are scratching their heads wondering what went wrong.
Saturday's match was one of the greatest internationals ever and arguments will rage long after the tour is ended.
Schalk Burger has since been given an eight-week ban for gouging Luke Fitzgerald's eye only 32 seconds into the match and Bakkies Botha has received a fortnight's suspension for a dangerous charge on Adam Jones.
Mike Phillips, the Wales scrum half, labelled Burger's behaviour "disgusting" and wants to know why he did not receive a red card. He's not the only one. And had the rightful punishment been meted out there and then, the Lions would have held a one-man advantage for almost the entire game.
David Hands, The Times Rugby Correspondent, asks "what if ...".
"What if Burger had been given a red card rather than a yellow for gouging Fitzgerald’s eye in the first minute? Or the game had not gone to uncontested scrums for nearly all of the second half, or the Lions midfield had remained intact?"
But South Africa are not world champions for nothing. Simon Shaw, who gave his best performance of his 15-year senior career, and Paul O'Connell, his captain, acknowledged that the Lions lost their way in the third quarter.
The Springboks took advantage - and this is what good sides do. They never let the Lions get out of sight, even when they were getting battered in the first half. They always looked like they had something in the locker, and so it proved when Bryan Habana sprung through.
So did they deserve their victory or were the Lions hard done by? Have your say below.